Cannibalism - What about Eucharistic Miracles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JennaR
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JennaR

Guest
I’m taking a Religious Studies course at college and the topic of Catholics believing in the actual presence of Christ in Eucharist was brought up. One student commented on it being cannibalism. I looked up some of the previous posts, and have an understanding of why consuming the Eucharist is not cannibalism - but most of the answers explain that we are not eating the physical body of Christ; rather, the body, soul and divinity of Christ all together. They also explain cannibalism as eating a physical part of the human body.

How then, is it not cannibalism in the event of a Eucharistic miracle when the host turns into actual flesh and the person consumes it? Thanks!
 
I’m taking a Religious Studies course at college and the topic of Catholics believing in the actual presence of Christ in Eucharist was brought up. One student commented on it being cannibalism. I looked up some of the previous posts, and have an understanding of why consuming the Eucharist is not cannibalism - but most of the answers explain that we are not eating the physical body of Christ; rather, the body, soul and divinity of Christ all together. They also explain cannibalism as eating a physical part of the human body.

How then, is it not cannibalism in the event of a Eucharistic miracle when the host turns into actual flesh and the person consumes it? Thanks!
Well, most people wouldn’t consume a Eucharistic Miracle!

Do you know of any cases where a Eucharistic Miracle occurred (a miracle that involved blood/flesh) and a person ate it?
 
[edited]

Would it be an accurate defence in to say that a transformed host has never been consumed?
 
I have in conversation, heard about the case of Julia Kim. Her story can be found at sacredheartofjesus.ca/Naju/Najuch.html

I have not looked into the legitimacy of this story.

Would it be an accurate defence in to say that a transformed host has never been consumed?
Julia sure is perplexing.

An accurate defense? Well I’d see what the Vatican says about Julia. If they have not approved it, your defense is valid. If they have approved it, you may be out of luck.

Then again, I’m just one out of many posters here, and many of them are more knowledgeable than me 😃
 
I’m taking a Religious Studies course at college and the topic of Catholics believing in the actual presence of Christ in Eucharist was brought up. One student commented on it being cannibalism. I looked up some of the previous posts, and have an understanding of why consuming the Eucharist is not cannibalism - but most of the answers explain that we are not eating the physical body of Christ; rather, the body, soul and divinity of Christ all together. They also explain cannibalism as eating a physical part of the human body.

How then, is it not cannibalism in the event of a Eucharistic miracle when the host turns into actual flesh and the person consumes it? Thanks!
Jesus is God and man. For it to be cannibalism, it would have to have been someone else’s flesh and blood or Jesus would have to have been only a man.

Maybe you should suggest to the student who commented on it being cannibalism to raise his/her sights higher . Technically we don’t have a word for it but if we did it would be something close to theopophagism ; as opposed to anthropophagism.

I’ve always found Julia Kim to be an interesting read. We could also recall that when Jesus explained we would need to eat his body and drink his blood to have life, many of his disciples left him :

[NAB] **John 6:51-69 **

I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world."

The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us (his) flesh to eat?”

Jesus said to them, "Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.

Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day.

For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him.

Just as the living Father sent me and I have life because of the Father, so also the one who feeds on me will have life because of me.

This is the bread that came down from heaven. Unlike your ancestors who ate and still died, whoever eats this bread will live forever."

These things he said while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum.

Then many of his disciples who were listening said, “This saying is hard; who can accept it?”

Since Jesus knew that his disciples were murmuring about this, he said to them, "Does this shock you?

What if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before?

It is the spirit that gives life, while the flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life.

But there are some of you who do not believe." Jesus knew from the beginning the ones who would not believe and the one who would betray him.

And he said, “For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by my Father.”

As a result of this, many (of) his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him.

Jesus then said to the Twelve, “Do you also want to leave?”

Simon Peter answered him, "Master, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.

We have come to believe and are convinced that you are the Holy One of God."
 
I’m taking a Religious Studies course at college and the topic of Catholics believing in the actual presence of Christ in Eucharist was brought up. One student commented on it being cannibalism. I looked up some of the previous posts, and have an understanding of why consuming the Eucharist is not cannibalism - but most of the answers explain that we are not eating the physical body of Christ; rather, the body, soul and divinity of Christ all together. They also explain cannibalism as eating a physical part of the human body.

How then, is it not cannibalism in the event of a Eucharistic miracle when the host turns into actual flesh and the person consumes it? Thanks!
The simpler approach to your research will likely be the more beneficial.

Eucharistic Miracles are not consumed, unless the Eucharist is already on the communicant’s tongue.

Eucharistic Miracles occur for different reasons known only to God, who allows them. God does not advocate cannibalism.
 
I’m taking a Religious Studies course at college and the topic of Catholics believing in the actual presence of Christ in Eucharist was brought up. One student commented on it being cannibalism. I looked up some of the previous posts, and have an understanding of why consuming the Eucharist is not cannibalism - but most of the answers explain that we are not eating the physical body of Christ; rather, the body, soul and divinity of Christ all together. They also explain cannibalism as eating a physical part of the human body.

How then, is it not cannibalism in the event of a Eucharistic miracle when the host turns into actual flesh and the person consumes it? Thanks!
I’m willing to bet any amount of money that the student that commented about receiving the Eucharist as being a form of cannibalism is a protestant. Does anyone else besides me find it amazing that protestants with argue with eachother about the core essential teachings of the Christian faith, but they’ll all flock together to attack us Catholics every chance they get? Sigh It never ends with these guys.
 
I’m willing to bet any amount of money that the student that commented about receiving the Eucharist as being a form of cannibalism is a protestant. Does anyone else besides me find it amazing that protestants with argue with eachother about the core essential teachings of the Christian faith, but they’ll all flock together to attack us Catholics every chance they get? Sigh It never ends with these guys.
You’re right,

two or more protestants get together and they feed off of each other…:eek:…did I just do a pun on cannibalism!!! 😃
 
You’re right,

two or more protestants get together and they feed off of each other…:eek:…did I just do a pun on cannibalism!!! 😃
My funniest example is an Evangelical and a Restorationist (similar to Mormons) banding together even though they are theologically miles apart. The Restorationist doesn’t even recognize Christ as divine, and yet when it comes to Catholic bashing, they agree with each other.

As for the Eucharist, isn’t it believed by Jews that the blood contains one’s soul? Therefore to drink the blood of Christ is to drink his soul. I’m not sure what their understanding of eating is, besides nourishment. But to eat something is to make what you eat part of you. So when we eat the flesh of Christ, Christ becomes a part of us, and us a part of Christ. Hence Communion.
 
My funniest example is an Evangelical and a Restorationist (similar to Mormons) banding together even though they are theologically miles apart. The Restorationist doesn’t even recognize Christ as divine, and yet when it comes to Catholic bashing, they agree with each other.

As for the Eucharist, isn’t it believed by Jews that the blood contains one’s soul? Therefore to drink the blood of Christ is to drink his soul. I’m not sure what their understanding of eating is, besides nourishment. But to eat something is to make what you eat part of you. So when we eat the flesh of Christ, Christ becomes a part of us, and us a part of Christ. Hence Communion.
You make perfect sense,

Like your example, there are also a few examples given by Jesus himself that clearly indicate that what He says is true and real - not just a symbol. Whether one believes that Jesus is one in being with the Father or not (i.e. JW’s and mormons), you would still have to use your reasoning skills to discover that Jesus was not talking about a symbol. Otherwise why would He let so many good disciples walk away on a misunderstanding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top