Canonization of Saint Thomas Aquinas

  • Thread starter Thread starter JGMendes4049
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JGMendes4049

Guest
Hello,

For a class of mine, I am doing a major research project on Saint Thomas Aquinas, and the project requires you to make seven “artifacts.” In other words, there are seven mini–projects within it. For one of them, I am doing an order of Mass for either his canonization or declaration as a Doctor of the Church.

The former event occurred in 1323; the latter in 1568. Therefore, they were before the liturgies of the Latin Church were streamlined and simplified.

I don’t know much about how canonization was done in those days. Was it during Mass? Was it paraliturgical?

Where could I find resources to create an order of service for it?

Thank you all!
 
Four suggestions:
  1. Try the people at New Liturgical Movement
    newliturgicalmovement.org/
  2. Since Thomas Aquinas was a Dominican try an orthodox Dominican province
    e.g. Godzdogz godzdogz.op.org/
  3. The Masses for both his Canonisation and his elevation to Doctor of the Church are probably extant and possibly the major Dominican province in Rome would have them.
  4. Don’t plan to put something into a research project unless you are sure you can obtain the materials you need.
 
Thank you for the tips!
Four suggestions:
  1. Try the people at New Liturgical Movement
    newliturgicalmovement.org/
  2. Since Thomas Aquinas was a Dominican try an orthodox Dominican province
    e.g. Godzdogz godzdogz.op.org/
  3. The Masses for both his Canonisation and his elevation to Doctor of the Church are probably extant and possibly the major Dominican province in Rome would have them.
But would it be a Papal Mass, or would it have been celebrated by a representative of the Pope, say, a cardinal?
  1. Don’t plan to put something into a research project unless you are sure you can obtain the materials you need.
Hence this thread! 🙂
 
Pre-conciliar canonizations were Papal Masses. True, this one happened before Trent, but much of the Mass was was exactly the same after Trent as before. I do not know of a specific source for an Ordo, but I do know that canonizations were basically the most elaborate Catholic ceremony on the face of the earth. Caged turtle doves and candles were presented to the Pope; the doves were released dramatically. These two things were “offerings” of the cultus of the newly canonized saint.
 
True, this one happened before Trent, but much of the Mass was was exactly the same after Trent as before.
I was under the impression that Trent suppressed certain elements of the Mass that were in vogue during the mediaeval ages? One example I can think of off the top of my head are the tropes in the Kyrie. Originally the Kyrie represented a litany like that still in existence in the Byzantine rite but the litany was lost very early on. During the mediaeval ages, tropes were added into the Kyrie in the Roman rite and it’s my understanding, actually, that the names of the Gregorian settings in the Kyriale were probably once the incipits of the first trope. Anyways, these were then suppressed at Trent.

Not sure about the Dominican rite though.

P.S. If you’re interested in hearing a troped Kyrie, here’s the Kyrie - Orbis Factor from the gradual of Eleanor of Britanny.
 
I was under the impression that Trent suppressed certain elements of the Mass that were in vogue during the mediaeval ages? One example I can think of off the top of my head are the tropes in the Kyrie. Originally the Kyrie represented a litany like that still in existence in the Byzantine rite but the litany was lost very early on. During the mediaeval ages, tropes were added into the Kyrie in the Roman rite and it’s my understanding, actually, that the names of the Gregorian settings in the Kyriale were probably once the incipits of the first trope. Anyways, these were then suppressed at Trent.

Not sure about the Dominican rite though.

P.S. If you’re interested in hearing a troped Kyrie, here’s the Kyrie - Orbis Factor from the gradual of Eleanor of Britanny.
Things were suppressed and whatnot, yes, but most of the “diocesan rites” from before the Council were extremely similar to the unified rite after it.
 
Pre-conciliar canonizations were Papal Masses. True, this one happened before Trent, but much of the Mass was was exactly the same after Trent as before. I do not know of a specific source for an Ordo, but I do know that canonizations were basically the most elaborate Catholic ceremony on the face of the earth. Caged turtle doves and candles were presented to the Pope; the doves were released dramatically. These two things were “offerings” of the cultus of the newly canonized saint.
Would it have been in Rome or in his homeland, England? If the latter, would it be the Use of York?
 
I wrote a thesis on St. Thomaa Aquinas. I admired him enormously until I suddenly came across his attitude toward ‘heretics’. He argued that they should not be executed by the Church. Instead, the Church should turn them over to the civil government to be executed!
Ever since then, my admiration for Aquinas has been, at best, lukewarm. I wonder if he deserved sainthood when he proposed capital punishment for those who had ideas that didn't conform to those of the Magisterium.
 
Speaking to a Dominican who’s researched in the topic would be useful. I don’t know any personally who are expert liturgical historians of the period but someone like Richard Conrad OP would be a good start and could point you in the way of others.

I’d rather not post his contact details in a public forum. If you can’t find them online I could PM you.

It is not relevant to your project, but I love reading the Lives of the Brethren; if you’re interested in the early Dominicans, you may like it.
 
I wrote a thesis on St. Thomaa Aquinas. I admired him enormously until I suddenly came across his attitude toward ‘heretics’. He argued that they should not be executed by the Church. Instead, the Church should turn them over to the civil government to be executed!
Code:
Ever since then, my admiration for Aquinas has been, at best, lukewarm. I wonder if he deserved sainthood when he proposed capital punishment for those who had ideas that didn't conform to those of the Magisterium.
Even the most brilliant thinkers of mankind spout a bit of falsehood now and then - it’s part of the human tradition. That is not to say that we abandon all of the truth that they did manage to harness.

Secondly, heresy was considered treason and treason was punishable by death. I think St. Thomas Aquinas was trying to say that the prerogative of the Church with respect to heresy did not extend to the point of death - but that heretics should be turned over to the civil government and tried for their own crimes against society and undergo whatever punishment was in the prerogative of the civil government to impose. I don’t necessarily agree with dear ol’ St. Thomas here but … yeah…
 
I do not think it was the custom at the time for Popes to leave Rome.
Are you sure? I’m not an expert, but I have a degree in Medieval History and I was under the impression that they never stopped travelling. They always seemed to be in Aquitaine negotiating peace between the English and French monarchies, in Lyons preaching Crusades, up and down to Florence, Siena, all around the Papal States, meeting the Holy Roman Emperor etc.

Far from never leaving Rome, it seems to me that the late Medieval Popes, especially at the height of the papacy’s actual temporal power, spent quite a lot of their time in the same way as secular leaders, i.e. with a travelling court.

I apologise if you’re refering to the period of Thomas’ declaration as Doctor, that’s out of my period and I don’t know whether the papacy was largely static by then.

I could be wrong, I welcome correction if so. 🙂
 
To the best of my understanding, before the Council of Trent, the form of the Mass was far from uniform throughout the church, and each individual diocese did it differently. Part of the purpose of Trent was to unify the Latin Rite.

Unless you are doing this for a Catholic school, I doubt your teacher will notice if you do it in the Tridentine Mass instead of whatever pre-Tridentine rite was used.
 
Unless you are doing this for a Catholic school, I doubt your teacher will notice if you do it in the Tridentine Mass instead of whatever pre–Tridentine rite was used.
It’s public school. That’s actually a great idea.

Now, what would a canonization be like using the 1962 Missale?
 
To the best of my understanding, before the Council of Trent, the form of the Mass was far from uniform throughout the church, and each individual diocese did it differently. Part of the purpose of Trent was to unify the Latin Rite.

Unless you are doing this for a Catholic school, I doubt your teacher will notice if you do it in the Tridentine Mass instead of whatever pre-Tridentine rite was used.
This is largely true, but the Roman missal had been spread by priests from Rome like Franciscans traveling around on missions (and from areas elsewhere that were using it), so it was probably the more common missal used by European Catholics already. Trent mandated that all use it exclusively, of course.
 
Now, what would a canonization be like using the 1962 Missale?
It would definitely be a Papal Mass, especially for someone as influential as St. Thomas Aquinas. I don’t know how a canonization would be different from a Papal Mass, though. If you go to this website and click on “The Holy Sacrifice”, there is a section on the ceremonies for a Solemn Pontifical High Mass at the Throne (according to the Tridentine Mass). The Papal Mass has some peculiar ceremonies of its own (if you need me to define or describe something, just let me know):

The Dean of the College of Cardinals was the asst. priest, a Cardinal-Deacons were the deacon of the Mass and the asst. deacons, and an auditor of the Roman Rota was the subdeacon. There was also an Eastern Catholic deacon and subdeacon vested in their Eastern vestments and following their own customs. Other positions were filled by other prelates; let me know if you need specifics.

The Pope entered being carried on the sedia gestoria, wearing the amice, falda, alb, pectoral cross, cincture, stole, mantum, gloves, ring of the fisherman, and papal tiara. Two flabella (ceremonial fans) were carried on either side of hime, and a canopy was carried over him. Like any other bishop, he blessed people as he was carried through the church. When he entered St. Peter’s Basilica, the noble guard (doesn’t exist anymore) played the Silveri Symphony. This is often misconceived to mean that they played silver trumpets.

He was then let off at the Altar of St. Gregory the Great, on which the Blessed Sacrament was reserved, to pray for a bit. He then went to the small throne for Terce. Like a bishop, he washed his hands and vested during the psalms of Terce.

The pope, during mass, wore the falda, alb, pectoral cross, cincture, stole, subcinctorium, tunicle, dalmatic, gloves, chasuble, fanon, pallium, ring of the fisherman, and mitre. He put on his maniple after the prayers at the foot of the altar like all bishops would. The pope’s maniple is specially decorated with intertwined red and gold threads, symbolizing the unity between Western and Eastern Catholicism.

Beyond that, there were not much differences from a regular Pontifical High Mass. The epistle and gospel were always chanted in Greek by the Eastern subdeacon and deacon after being chanted in Latin by the Western subdeacon and deacon. The Silveri Symphony sounded at the elevations as the Pope turned toward the people. There was never any Sanctus bell. The paten was covered by a twelve-rayed asterisk, similar to the four-rayed asterisk used to cover the diskos in the Eastern rites. After the postcommunion but before the Last Gospel, he published a plenary indulgence. After the Last Gospel, he donned the tiara and left on the sedia just like he entered.

Unfortunately, I don’t know of any additional ceremonies within the Papal Mass except for a Papal Coronation. Papal Coronation Masses, by the way, were probably the longest Masses ever celebrated in the history of the Church. John XXIII’s coronation lasted FIVE HOURS. I assume the liturgical color for Thomas Aquinas’s canonization would be white, since that is the color for non-martyr saints.

I hope this helps.
 
Hello,

For a class of mine, I am doing a major research project on Saint Thomas Aquinas, and the project requires you to make seven “artifacts.” In other words, there are seven mini–projects within it. For one of them, I am doing an order of Mass for either his canonization or declaration as a Doctor of the Church.

The former event occurred in 1323; the latter in 1568. Therefore, they were before the liturgies of the Latin Church were streamlined and simplified.

I don’t know much about how canonization was done in those days. Was it during Mass? Was it paraliturgical?

Where could I find resources to create an order of service for it?

Thank you all!
The canonization was done before Mass and then Mass was celebrated. We are given a few details of it by biographers. Do you read Latin? If so, I can suggest a resource or two.You can also find a short Latin description here ( corpusthomisticum.org/bencanon.html ). The italicized incipts denote specific texts - you can find them even in a modern missal, I think - let me know if you have problems locating it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top