For the record, I wrote the my post above *before *I saw this post.
What I am perceiving is integrity and diligence which are perhaps even more essential than the list I have requested.
I once logged onto a Christian forum as “Reluctant Prophet”. I chose that name primarily just to stir the Christians although I found that it stirred the Secularists even more. But once chosen, those who knew me in r/t commented that the name really suited me.
Unfortunately the “Reluctant” aspect of the name came from the fact that I could only foresee very, very, seriously dark future for Mankind and thus was reluctant to go into such matters and discussions.
But on the more hopeful and positive side, I could see that this list is a first step to “unscrambling the egg”, a notably impossible miracle, but I am accustom to such challenges.
I consider the accurate list to be as the “DNA” of Jesus. Long ago, I felt that the resurrected Jesus seemed to be missing one significant “gene” from his “DNA”. That gene related to the promotion of the attempt to understand (whether entirely accomplishable or not). Jesus taught in a time when Solomon had already emphasized the need to “seek understanding” and wisdom so Jesus had no need to preach on such effort.
But it seems the result of him not preaching on that issue left his pursuant church to under-emphasis the need to at least try toward understanding rather than merely be awestruck and mystified by the glory. As I have stated, I believe that if this one “tiny hole in the dike” had been attend to, the subsequent and current “flood” would have never been necessary and the past 2000 years would have been more than sufficient for the Catholic Church to become just as its name implies.
Without this gene of understanding within the DNA of Christianity, cancer develops quite easily. The Catholic certainly should be able to testify to such cancer. The Muslim nor the Protestant would exist.
But one of the many insights that I gained “upon the mountain” was a cure and prevention for such cancer. I named it “Four dimensional stitching”.
The idea is basically that in all directions, the essential understanding of exactly what Jesus stood upon be canonized so that it could be cross checked and verified with any new “cell” being developed. This means that as A leads to B, B is verified to be fundamentally exactly what A was at its core. But further, as B leads to C, C is also verified against A so as to “double stitch” the body of Jesus into a more solidly pure being.
What is most essential is that his principles be very clearly stated with its words well defined. Without clarity, clouds, disorder, dust, uncleanliness, and germs grow out of control and my house would begin to look, well… like Christianity.
If the body cells are verified in such a manner, Cancer cannot occur. A similar thing is applied with the Nicene Creed. But I find that creed to be seriously lacking mostly due to the list being so easily misunderstood. That too can be fixed.
Of course, I am not expecting the Church to change its ways, but I do want to verify for myself that such a need is real (of God). And thus I ask not of the leaders, fore it is a bit irrelevant what they understand of such a list, but rather ask of those closer to the “bottom” to reveal what understanding of Jesus is being propagated, if any.
The very dark, even black, imminent event for Man can be diverted, but not without restoring the Logos. After only a few steps, I can see that every problem that Man has ever faced or is ever likely to face will have a ready prevention. The eternal life of harmony is God’s aim (purpose). That can be shown to even the lesser mind.
All of this is of course a rather long issue of a theoretical nature and not directly relevant to this thread, but reveals my intent in asking the question that I asked.
I find it interesting that no one has yet mentioned what Jesus declared to be the utmost important “commandment” - “Love God”. Without that one principle, the others are irrelevant, not merely because Jesus said it was the highest of all commandments, but because he was right.
Due to that one principle not being well defined, all atheists are born and all arrogance is inspired.
I thank you each for your replies thus far and I will continue checking back in hopes of a completed list. From my perspective, no other focus for any church at this time, could be more relevant (of God).
) Forgive me my methodology.
