B
BiologyBrain
Guest
I have no problem w/ inmates being rehabilitated. However, it is a fact that in order for rehabilitation to work - the inmates must work for it as opposed to just having someone preach at them. That’s my point in this statement “Rehabilitation is not a one-sided proposition - the inmate must work w/ counsellors, psychologists, etc in order for it to be acheived.” IMO rehabilitation is like attending Mass & getting ‘something’ out of it… You get out of it what you put into it. If you attend just b/c you have to, you’re not going to get much out of it. However, if you attend b/c you want to and you try to contemplate the Mysteries presented w/ your whole heart & soul, you’ll get a lot out of it. However, a priest cannot make someone who doesn’t put any effort into Mass ‘get something’ out of it. No matter how charismatic, charming, intelligent, holy, etc the priest is - he cannot change an unwilling person’s heart & soul without their help and acceptance.Your opinion, it seems to me, lacks charity and promotes a rash judgment regarding the interior disposition of inmates and denies the Holy Spirit’s ability to convert the most hardened criminal. Both the lack of charity toward and rash judgment about others are not Catholic dispositions (see your Catechism). I challenge you to pray for the grace to volunteer as a Catholic Chaplain Volunteer and make a difference in effecting a higher rate of rehabilitation for more good is done by becoming an instrument of the Holy Spirit in praying and dialoguing with these men than having them chipping rocks on their own.
A friend of mine was a case worker in our State Penitentiary. He worked w/ the inmates to try to help rehabilitate them. He’s where I get my opinion that some people aren’t into being rehabilitated. Its not a rash judgement on my part - its acceptance of the facts as they’ve been presented to me. I never indicated that no inmates could/would be rehabilitated. However, I do not think all inmates can/will be rehabilitated. From a psychological standpoint, only those who are willing to put in the effort will be rehabilitated. If they do not think they did anything wrong while they admit guilt for their crime, they are not going to be rehabilitated. My friend told me stories of inmates that fit all these parameters - those that accepted help and truly desired rehabilitation were rehabilitated. However, those that rejected help were not.
We all know people who reject help no matter how it is presented. We all know people who are in denial of their sinfulness and refuse to reconcile with the truth. We all know people who manipulate the system/people to get what they want without regard for good. Hopefully, its not a majority of people who are this way, but there are some. This is the reality of which I’m speaking.
There’s nothing that says inmates working on chain gangs could not benefit from the Holy Spirit and/or counselling as well… I’m offering chain gangs as an alternative to the death penalty - not as an alternative to rehabilitation. I think you misunderstood my intention behind the chain gang statement. There is nothing about chain gangs that is inherently in opposition to rehabilitation, counselling, reparation, etc. Instead the chain gangs are a type of corporal punishment that was used in the past (and still in some places now) that worked.
If you think my opinion lacks charity & promotes rash judgement, I charge you w/ the same vices… You lack charity and came to a rash judgement of my statements w/o full understanding. You gain more by asking questions than by casting aspersions. I’m grateful for the chance to clarify though.