- Status
W
WanderAimlessly
Guest
Sean O L:
However, if it is true, this so-called “Bishop”'s response is indicative of the mentality of the schism.
Instead of directly responding to the arguments presented, the response starts out:
I have bookmarked this site and may use it to cause a member of this cult to have a cerebral meltdown.
PF
First off, I do not know if this blog is actually true, so I will be a little skeptical of it for the moment
However, if it is true, this so-called “Bishop”'s response is indicative of the mentality of the schism.
Instead of directly responding to the arguments presented, the response starts out:
The rest of the letter has the same combative, arrogant, and condescending tone to it implying that they are More Catholic than the Pope.
I have bookmarked this site and may use it to cause a member of this cult to have a cerebral meltdown.
PF
K
katolik
Guest
What Christian behavoir!! I will cause those “schismatics” to have cerebral meltdowns. Hurrah You’re going to mortally wound someone. Hurrah! THere is no more 5th commandment anymore because they are dirty schismatics?
F
Fogny
Guest
Sean O L:
This debate can only be settled by time either the SPPX will grow or it will wither away.
I personally feel the SPPX will reunite with Rome, as Rome will become more orthodox. What are the choices Cardinal Mahoney style abuses or Bishop Fellay’s Orthodoxy. I am not speaking of the SPPX’s failure to accept vatican II, just their orthodoxy.
Fogny
Sean,
This debate can only be settled by time either the SPPX will grow or it will wither away.
I personally feel the SPPX will reunite with Rome, as Rome will become more orthodox. What are the choices Cardinal Mahoney style abuses or Bishop Fellay’s Orthodoxy. I am not speaking of the SPPX’s failure to accept vatican II, just their orthodoxy.
Fogny
E
EddieArent
Guest
If it’s on the Internet then it must be true. 
:whacky:
:whacky:
J
John_Higgins
Guest
If there is no union with Rome, Bishop Fellay doesn’t have orthodoxy.
John
F
Fogny
Guest
John Higgins:
Fogny
If this is true then I did not make myself clear. I meant in Bp. Fellay’s preference to the rite and rituals before Vatican II.
Fogny
J
John_Higgins
Guest
Okay.
About your signature, I trust you know that that is not the quote is not the one from the TLM. They way you have it is “speak but the word and my boy will be healed.” Do we have something to add to the prayer list?
John
About your signature, I trust you know that that is not the quote is not the one from the TLM. They way you have it is “speak but the word and my boy will be healed.” Do we have something to add to the prayer list?
John
F
Fogny
Guest
John Higgins:
Fogny
Thank you for the correction of latin, but you’re attitude is in bad taste.
Fogny
J
James0235
Guest
John Higgins:
James
It could just be Matthew 8:8. I don’t have a Latin bible handy to check it out.
James
J
John_Higgins
Guest
No sarcasm here. I meant what I said.
FYI, it is “et sanabitur anima mea”, i.e., “and my soul will be healed”.
I had actually thought you may have had some boy who needed healing.
John
FYI, it is “et sanabitur anima mea”, i.e., “and my soul will be healed”.
I had actually thought you may have had some boy who needed healing.
John
B
bear06
Guest
Here we go again! You act like SSPX’s failure to accept Vatican II is just a trivial matter. We’ll just forget about that little part and he’s just peachy? Argh! Even a blind squirrel (Mahoney) can find a nut once in awhile. Does this mean we should extoll him and forget his other transgressions?
T
TNT
Guest
John Higgins:
However his sig says:
Domine non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum sed tantum dic verbo et sanabitur puer meus
Matt:8:8 in the Vulgate says:
…Domine non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum sed tantum dic verbo et sanabitur puer meus
So in the context of a Scriptural quote, he is correct. Only when you apply it to the changes made for the TLM, does it become inaccurate.
I think that the subsequent remark by dear Fogny would have been avoided if you would have pointed out the correctness as a Scriptural quote.
I had read his sig earlier, and did some digging. When I found it as a Scripture quote, I let it rest.
God bless, I do not think you meant anything other than a comment in charity.
John, you are assuming that Fogny was quoting the TLM.
However his sig says:
Domine non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum sed tantum dic verbo et sanabitur puer meus
Matt:8:8 in the Vulgate says:
…Domine non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum sed tantum dic verbo et sanabitur puer meus
So in the context of a Scriptural quote, he is correct. Only when you apply it to the changes made for the TLM, does it become inaccurate.
I think that the subsequent remark by dear Fogny would have been avoided if you would have pointed out the correctness as a Scriptural quote.
I had read his sig earlier, and did some digging. When I found it as a Scripture quote, I let it rest.
God bless, I do not think you meant anything other than a comment in charity.
F
Fogny
Guest
You are both kind and right. I did change it as I added the priests prayer at receiving our blessed Lord.
Fogny
B
Benedictus
Guest
FYI, you misspelled “meam”.
F
Friar_David_O.Carm
Guest
Only settled by time?
SSPX will grow or it will wither away?
So if it grows then you think it is true?
Then you must think that protestantism and islam are true becuase of their growth.
Growth of a schismatic group proves nothing except for the fact that many love schism over the truth.
J
John_Higgins
Guest
All,
I should have remembered that part. Silly me. Here’s that verse in another language to show that my participation in this thread is Finnished.
8:8 Mutta sadanpäämies vastasi ja sanoi: "Herra, en minä ole sen arvoinen, että tulisit minun kattoni alle; vaan sano ainoastaan sana, niin minun palvelijani paranee.
Blessings,
John
I should have remembered that part. Silly me. Here’s that verse in another language to show that my participation in this thread is Finnished.
8:8 Mutta sadanpäämies vastasi ja sanoi: "Herra, en minä ole sen arvoinen, että tulisit minun kattoni alle; vaan sano ainoastaan sana, niin minun palvelijani paranee.
Blessings,
John
F
Fogny
Guest
There is clearly 2 truths present in the Latin Church today.
- The Christ centered Church prior to Vatican II
- The Man centered Church today.
Fogny
C
Catholic29
Guest
S
Sean_O_L
Guest
Amen!
Fogny, there is only ONE HOLY CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC Church instituted by Christ, maintained by the Holy Spirit, until the END of the WORLD. That Church (which has endured much suffering over the last two thousand odd years is visible and under the Vicar of Christ in Rome - currently being Pope John Paul II.
You are suffering from a delusion. I hope it goes away quickly.
What you are saying is heterodox.
- Status