M
Mysty101
Guest
I’m not sure where to post this, but I cannot believe…
I do not agree. Law should not be allowed to serve anywhere where he would be responsible for the well being of children—He is definitely not capable in that capacity.
Personally, the monastary would be too good for him—sackcloth and ashes is too good for him.
To have him publically honored? We know the Catholic Church has made mistakes, all society did (otherwise we wouldn’t need Megan’s Law), but to flaunt it in the face of victims?? This is beyond stupid. The only negative thing I could even think of saying about our beloved Holy Father is that he protected Law. (Law’s crime was he protected abusers or even worse just shoved them under the rug–or maybe sent disability checks to nude gay resorts?)
And if he felt any remorse, wouldn’t he refuse the limelight? It the Church is stupid enough to allow this, shouldn’t he have had the decency to refuse the honor???
(Oh well, I guess there won’t be many Boston (or other US) parishes making the Cardinal’s Appeal goals again this year.)
Someone had suggested for Law to have voluntered to serve as a small Parrish Priest.Day 4: Monday, April 11, 5 p.m. For the Chapters of the Patriarchal Basilicas. The concelebration will be presided by Cardinal Bernard Francis Law, archbishop emeritus of Boston and archpriest of the Patriarchal Basilica of St Mary Major.
I do not agree. Law should not be allowed to serve anywhere where he would be responsible for the well being of children—He is definitely not capable in that capacity.
Personally, the monastary would be too good for him—sackcloth and ashes is too good for him.
To have him publically honored? We know the Catholic Church has made mistakes, all society did (otherwise we wouldn’t need Megan’s Law), but to flaunt it in the face of victims?? This is beyond stupid. The only negative thing I could even think of saying about our beloved Holy Father is that he protected Law. (Law’s crime was he protected abusers or even worse just shoved them under the rug–or maybe sent disability checks to nude gay resorts?)
And if he felt any remorse, wouldn’t he refuse the limelight? It the Church is stupid enough to allow this, shouldn’t he have had the decency to refuse the honor???
(Oh well, I guess there won’t be many Boston (or other US) parishes making the Cardinal’s Appeal goals again this year.)