Cardinal Leger had it right

  • Thread starter Thread starter godisgood77
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

godisgood77

Guest
When he spoke at the Second Vatican Council on Sept 16, 1964 and said the following…

"I feel a special difficulty regarding the title ‘mediatrix.’ Its exact interpretation is very difficult. Indeed, authors apply quite varied interpretations to this term. Furthermore, the idea seems to frontally oppose the notion of unicus Mediator [Christ is the sole Mediator].

Regarding devotion to Mary, my opinion is that this text, which was meant to renew Marian devotion, will not be strong enough to contain all the abuses the document wants to repress. For, even though it curbs the abuse of fruitless affection and futile naïveté, it says nothing expressly about the need to correctly order Marial devotion. It speaks as if this devotion per se would lead the faithful to the knowledge, love, and glorification of Christ.

The affirmations of the document are true. But, aren’t they taking an excessively theoretical approach? Because it often happens - as was already noted by Cardinal Newman - that in fact the Marial devotion of the Christian people is not sufficiently oriented toward God or toward Christ."

(Paul Émile Leger, Intervention in the Conciliar Assembly, on September 16, 1964, apud Boaventura Kloppenburg, Concilio Vaticano II, Chronicle, Petropolis: Vozes, vol. 4, pp. 24-25) .
 
the Marial devotion of the Christian people is not sufficiently oriented toward God or toward Christ."
Could you please give me a link to where Newman wrote this.

Have you read what Cardinal Leger actually said or did you just read a translation on
the Tradition in Action website?
 
I don’t buy that devotion to Mary could ever fail to focus a person all the more strongly on God/Christ except in the most extreme situations of ignorance, the sort in which people really do not know (or care) who the Bible and Catholic doctrine say Jesus and Mary are. Such ignorance does exist in parts of Latin America and elsewhere from what I’ve read, but the potential confusion of the most ignorant among Catholics could just as easily be an argument against any and all Magisterial teaching.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top