The second article is great. I was wondering about that: if the media “progressive” hype was exceeding what was really happening. Interesting that some of it is actually coming from Vatican press. That seems very likely to me. No offense, but these Cardinals just aren’t all that exciting and hip. It’s like we’re watching Oprah out here.Edward Pentin (National Catholic Register) on this issue:
Questionable Aspects of the Synod on the Family
Read more: ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/questionable-aspects-of-the-synod-on-the-family#ixzz3FlTIMyq2
And Marco Tosatti (La Stampa/Vatican Insider):
"Synod: Most Are Against Kasper"
rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2014/10/synod-majority-is-against-kasper.html
Yeah, it would make sense. I’ve seen a number of blogs and such say that the presentation to the public is not very representative of what’s actually going onThe second article is great. I was wondering about that: if the media “progressive” hype was exceeding what was really happening. Interesting that some of it is actually coming from Vatican press. That seems very likely to me. No offense, but these Cardinals just aren’t all that exciting and hip. It’s like we’re watching Oprah out here.
They seem to love to create and post winners and losers, as usual. Well, I have news for the media. The final decision on my annulment process didn’t start with “We are pleased to tell you…” or “Congratulations.” It was almost like I wished I had never started the process. And my ex was offended when she received the same news. It was sad for both of us, actually.Yeah, it would make sense. I’ve seen a number of blogs and such say that the presentation to the public is not very representative of what’s actually going on
CNS is live tweeting as the Synod goes on and said yesterday that the Synod strongly reaffirmed that divorced/remarried without an annulment cannot receive communion, but much of the media seems to present it as a dramatic, evenly split battle, so who knows?