"Cardinal Pell's appeal process to begin in June." (Two-day hearing when his conviction could be overturned)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well at least he has something to look forward to from his cell for the next couple months.
 
I hope the conviction is overturned, balancing everything I have read I find the verdict no convincing. George Weigel wrote a pretty good article on it a couple of weeks ago. I searched out those who supported the juries verdict and their arguments are not as convincing. An article from December in the national catholic register also calls the evidence into question.
 
You can check out Weigel on Patrick Coffins show titled “the show Trial of Cardinal Pell.” Where Weigel and coffin not so thinly veil accusations equating the verdict to racism verdicts and antisemitism verdicts. Coffin goes so far as to say the public is to a “crucify Him!” level of rabidness. (in essence comparing Pell to Jesus) The supposed railroading of Pell is presented as fact by his friend Weigel. I’m conservative. I loved what Pell stood for. Accusing the Jury of a hatred and bias so horrible it would send an old man basically to his death in prison should in itself be a crime. It is a moral one for sure.

BTW I LOVE coffin, and I don’t really care for weigel. But I’m so disappointed with PC.
 
Accusing the Jury of a hatred and bias so horrible it would send an old man basically to his death in prison should in itself be a crime. It is a moral one for sure.
Why should that be a crime? Where does your faith in modern criminal justice system come from. Seems to me, the more we learn, the more often juries get it wrong. I see no problem in criticizing a jury or prosecutor or judge if it appears they reached a wrong verdict. I am not saying this one did, but I am skeptical.

I have little faith in the US criminal justice system, perhaps Australia has a better record.
 
I, too, am quite dubious of this verdict. Granted, all I have to go on is what I read in the media, which necessarily slants things either for or against Cardinal Pell. But from what I’ve read, I’m stunned that he was convicted. As a brother priest, it’s terrifying. I’m not saying this is what the jury did, but even the judge in his sentencing acknowledged the lynch mob mentality against Cardinal Pell. It seems that in our modern age, if the accused is a Catholic priest, he is assumed guilty until proven innocent, rather than assumed innocent until proven guilty. Again, as a priest, this is terrifying.

No doubt there have been priests falsely accused of sexual abuse, long since deceased and unable to defend themselves. Yet their reputation is forever destroyed. And I get it…it’s all part of the job description. A priest is an alter cristus. Christ was falsely accused. We should expect to be as well. (Obviously, many are and were guilty. I’m not talking about them.) But that pius sentiment is not really comforting in the midst of a trial. Or in a prison cell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top