Catholic and non-Catholic wedding and the Church teachings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholicwoman11
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Catholicwoman11

Guest
A Catholic that I know disagrees with the teaching that Catholic and a non-Catholic Christian should not wed without the Church’s blessing. He believes that this teaching is wrong. This got me wondering on what we can disagree with in the Church. As an argument against believing the everything the Church teaches he brought up the Spanish Inquisition. So what is considered papal infallibility and what isn’t?
 
Your friend is referring to a discipline not a teaching. But be that as it may…if he attempts marriage outside the Church he will not be actually getting married…so it is important for him to approach such in the right way. (In a similar way if my wife and I tried to get married in our State without a license from the state…it would not be a legal marriage -(though it is a pale analogy for marriage is not simply a legal thing )

As to disagreements. One can have various theological approaches …various theological schools of thought that are all within orthodox thought. They can disagree with each other but not be contrary to the Teachings of the Church.

As to the Teachings of the Church we are to give our assent. Some things are the assent of Faith other things for example are religious submission of intellect and will. It is not just infallible things that one is to assent to. We profess and live the Teachings of the Church.

Catechism:

The teaching office

888 Bishops, with priests as co-workers, have as their first task “to preach the Gospel of God to all men,” in keeping with the Lord’s command.415 They are “heralds of faith, who draw new disciples to Christ; they are authentic teachers” of the apostolic faith "endowed with the authority of Christ."416

889 In order to preserve the Church in the purity of the faith handed on by the apostles, Christ who is the Truth willed to confer on her a share in his own infallibility. By a “supernatural sense of faith” the People of God, under the guidance of the Church’s living Magisterium, "unfailingly adheres to this faith."417

890 The mission of the Magisterium is linked to the definitive nature of the covenant established by God with his people in Christ. It is this Magisterium’s task to preserve God’s people from deviations and defections and to guarantee them the objective possibility of professing the true faith without error. Thus, the pastoral duty of the Magisterium is aimed at seeing to it that the People of God abides in the truth that liberates. To fulfill this service, Christ endowed the Church’s shepherds with the charism of infallibility in matters of faith and morals. the exercise of this charism takes several forms:

891 “The Roman Pontiff, head of the college of bishops, enjoys this infallibility in virtue of his office, when, as supreme pastor and teacher of all the faithful - who confirms his brethren in the faith he proclaims by a definitive act a doctrine pertaining to faith or morals… the infallibility promised to the Church is also present in the body of bishops when, together with Peter’s successor, they exercise the supreme Magisterium,” above all in an Ecumenical Council.418 When the Church through its supreme Magisterium proposes a doctrine "for belief as being divinely revealed,"419 and as the teaching of Christ, the definitions "must be adhered to with the obedience of faith."420 This infallibility extends as far as the deposit of divine Revelation itself.421

892 Divine assistance is also given to the successors of the apostles, teaching in communion with the successor of Peter, and, in a particular way, to the bishop of Rome, pastor of the whole Church, when, without arriving at an infallible definition and without pronouncing in a “definitive manner,” they propose in the exercise of the ordinary Magisterium a teaching that leads to better understanding of Revelation in matters of faith and morals. To this ordinary teaching the faithful "are to adhere to it with religious assent"422 which, though distinct from the assent of faith, is nonetheless an extension of it.

(vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P2A.HTM)
 
So many questions in such a short post. (note: I know this isn’t about you. I’m just using the pronoun “you” for expediency)

On marriage within the Church:
Is it so hard to advise the Church of your pending marriage? She is responsible for the spiritual well-being of her whole flock. In order to best accommodate your needs, she really needs to understand your state in life. Even if you marry a non-Catholic in his place of worship (as opposed to your own), how difficult can it be to send out one more invitation? I understand that notification to the Church involves a little more (pre-marriage counseling which any secular person would advise, anyway) but it really isn’t intrusive.

As for “wrong,” who do you think has the “right” to regulate marriage. The Church is the only entity with a lasting interest in marriage. The government only took an interest in recent centuries but the Church has been helping couples marry since her beginning. Only the Church will help you be sure your marriage is valid before God. Why would you risk accidentally being in an adulterous relationship?

On the Inquisition:
Your friend doesn’t understand history. The Church’s role in the Inquisition was only to determine whether a person was a faithful Catholic or was a heretic or non-Catholic posing as a Catholic. Heretics and non-Catholics would have been denied the Sacraments as a result.

The shame that tarnishes the Church’s image today is that the governments would then torture and kill the non-Catholics and heretics as traitors. The Church did not do enough to distance herself from governmental actions.

On Papal Infallibility:
This little-used characteristic actually has no bearing on the other issues raised. Only 2 doctrines were ever proclaimed ex cathedra: Mary’s Assumption and her Immaculate Conception. Normally, infallible doctrine comes from the Magesterium (the college of bishops in communion with the Pope) as preserved in Sacred Tradition.

To the OP:
We may not dissent on doctrinal/dogmatic issues. We may verbally disagree in areas of discipline in internal discussion but should abide by that discipline anyway. One’s conscience can never legitimately cause him to violate doctrine and it is exceedingly rare that conscience can legitimately violate a discipline.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top