I have a 3 year child who has not been baptized. The mother is a non-practicing Catholic who clearly indicated my wishes will not be honored. She lives across country and I have no visitation rights yet. I can not afford a lawyer yet to force the issue. Do I have any inherent paternal rights that I can use to get my child baptized? Everything from the surname (hers) to all child care issues have been at her will, to my complete exclusion. She has been going to one of those fruit-loop non-mainline evangelical churches and I am do not want my child baptized in that environment outside the Church.
Thanks,
Henry
The answer is actually 2-part:
As far as parental consent is concerned, as long as at least one parent requests baptism, the child can be baptised. In other words, one parent cannot prevent it, so long as one parent wants it. Canon 868.1.1 In fact, the canon says that “the parents…or at least one of them…gives consent” You don’t even have to request it, consent is sufficient.
The other requirement (and both must be met) is that the pastor (doing the baptism) must have a “founded hope” that the infant will be raised in the Catholic faith (868.1.2) This standard is much more difficult to meet given your circumstances. It’s difficult to convince the pastor that the child will be raised in the faith, given that the only parent who has legal custody is opposed to that happening.
At the risk of being painfully obvious, given that you don’t have any visitation privileges under civil law, meeting the standard that the child will be raised in the faith is going to be almost impossible to meet.
The only small (and it is little indeed) comfort in this is that the ecclesial community which you’ve described might be unlikely to baptise infants in the first place, so for the time-being at least, you might not have to worry about the child being baptised outside the Church.