MrS:
a lot more strict: does that mean the former priest was too lax… and permitted anything? Or could it be that the people ran the parish until this priest did his job as a priest - take charge of his flock. After all, the sheperd is not supposed to be one of the sheep,
By getting rid of forms of music except for cantor, it sounds like the priest may be changing things that were not wrong in the first place. Of course, he can run things his way, but a shepherd is probably advised when meeting a flock for the first time to start by taking away the traditions and practices they have grown up being used to. Tradition is important to the Church, and it is important to her individual sheep. Sheep get confused when their new shepherd uproots their security blanket of The Way We’ve Always Done It (whether right or wrong) and gotten used to it, and speaks with a different voice all at once. It’s quite possible all that change can confuse, sadden, and even anger the sheep.
As a minimum, the priest might be well advised to be open and forthcoming about why he’s coming in here and changing everything. If half the flock ends up wandering away, he really can’t rest in the knowledge that for those “faithful” sheep who stay, we now have things under control. He cannot rest in this knowledge because if he were a Good Shepherd he would even leave the “faithful” flock to go find and bring home the lost sheep.
We can’t have it both ways. We cannot use the shepherd comparison unless we use it all the way. We can’t pick and choose which characteristics of a Good Shepherd we wish to embody, lest we lose the whole metaphor as merely an excuse to be the way we feel like being due to personality or whatever.
Hence, a shepherd who uses his ordained and assigned authority to control the sheep but speaks to them in a voice half of them don’t understand, and is not open about hearing why they’re leaving or problem-solving with them, has to be considered a Cafeteria Shepherd.
people of the church should have some say: and they do. The format is usually the parish council and various committes. But the pastor always has the last word (admittedly this is sometimes the problem, and I speak from much experience). But the people should be sitting down with him, expressing their concerns, listening to his answers etc. From what you write, it does not sound like he is doing things that are unorthodox. Perhaps the “fellowship” attitude of the parish is being re-directed to what is really important - the liturgy and the sacraments.
He is not doing things unorthodox, but is he doing things that are kind? Or is more like he sees babies with candy and thinks it is time for them to Grow Up so he takes it away?
You bring up a good point about parish committees, and about communicating with this priest. I was VP our of own pastoral committee, president of Home and School assn, member of stewardship and other committees, and my wife was involved in many committees. This can be maddening due to the politics, and often there is a dead end that stops at the priest or one of his delegates the he does not wish to override for one reason or other.
I’d like to hear from the OP whether the OP or others have tried to talk to this priest.
people started leaving the church: that should only be a last alternative. Besides, where will they go… to a church that better fits THEIR idea of how to run things, or to a church where you can worship God, and receive valid Sacraments? Being a Catholic is probably the hardest thing you will ever do… but think of the rewards. A number of people have left my parish. While they often disagree with how the pastor runs the administrative part of the parish, they leave because they sense the decline and the quality of the spiritual life in the parish. Don’t leave… stay and make every attempt to fix the problem… after you identify it (talk with the pastor)
This is excellent advice for the OP in terms of not leaving the church, and since Robster is trying to get his parents back to the Church, I’m assuming that Robster isn’t the one who needs this advice.
The problem is many seem to want to blame people leaving the Church on the sheep. Sure not all of them are going to like every priest, and some would leave on grounds that others think is petty. That said, if Robster’s characterization is correct, that this priest came in and changed a lot of stuff that may or may not have needed to be changed, without explaining it to the people, and upsetting them, then I think part of the responsibility has to be taken on bythe shepherd. A good shepherd doesn’t come in, stir things up so the sheep are in a confused frenzy, watch half his flock leave and then say, “wonder where they think they’re going? Don’t they realize they could be losing their salvation? Oh, well, for those left, Mass starts in 10 minutes.”
Alan