Catholic Convert Doubting

  • Thread starter Thread starter SetonGirl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I must admit that I am a little distressed that inclusive language has been taken from the liturgy. I don’t mean in ridiculous places like the Creed, but in other areas. OK, it is something I can offer up, probably has something to do with my own history, but really, what is the problem with Brothers and Sisters, Human is not a bad compromise, but I hope the church as a whole makes this a legitimate choice for Pastors in their congregations.
I agree. There’s a prayer (I can’t remember which one - - maybe the Confiteor) where it appears the priest has the option of “brothers and sisters” or “brethren”. At the conservative parish, the priest says “brethren”. At my parish, we don’t even do the Confiteor (we just say or sing Lord haver mercy/Kyrie).
 
Hello fellow convert,
I also converted to the Catholic Church 2 years ago from evangelical protestantism. I experienced something similar in that the first CC i attended had a priest teaching liberal albeit implicit vs. explicit teachings in some of his homilies. I simply went to a different church. I admit that I wish many times our priests gave more time to the liturgy of the Word as far as the homily goes but quit honestly can’t understand why a liberal priest could shake your faith in the church, surely before becoming Catholic you were catechized and know who founded this church you belong to.Theologically and doctrinally how could you return to church so radically different unless you are divided on many such issues as the baptism, Eucharist, Justification, Tradition, Apostolic Succession, Mary etc. My advice for you is to find some Catholics who are (to use some good old evangelical lingo) on fire for the Lord. Fellowship and most importantly prayer…
We all go through valleys… Read Mother Teresa’s biography.

In Christ
.
I was somewhat catechized at RCIA but I had done a lot of self-study over the years so I definitely knew what I needed to know and believe to become Catholic. The reason a liberal priest is shaking my faith in the Church is complex and I don’t have the answer. I keep trying to figure this out. Part of the reason seems to be that I’m disheartened to see that the Bishop and the majority of parishoners don’t seem to care about orthodoxy. Another reason is that there’s a small part of me that wonders if the priest may be half right - - maybe there are too many rules (like the Pharisees) and maybe he is trying to make Jesus more accessible to people. If that is right, then it shakes my entire foundation because if one can disagree with the Church, then how can one be Catholic.

I’m over-simplyfying my thought process. But I’m obviously confused by all this. Adding to the confusion is the fact that I did seek out “on fire” Catholics and it disheartened me because the ultra conservative/orthodox types wear mantillas and have gigantic families and want Latin in the liturgy and seem grumpy. And then confusing me more, I joined a group that advertizes itself as faithful to the Magisterium but at one of the meetings, during the discussion, a couple of the members used curse words. When I attended Protestant Bible studies, no one would ever swear. I guess what I’m saying is that even the people that are on fire are not as on fire or acting regenerated like the Evangelicals I used to know.

And you asked how could I return to a church so different? I’m not. I never said I was returning to a Protestant church. That’s what makes things more messed up. I feel in limbo (no pun intended). And I know what I believed about all those issues you mentioned: baptism, Eucharist, Justification, Tradition, Apostolic Succession, Mary etc. What baffles me is how I could completely change my opinions on some of these issues almost literally over night. I went from being disheartened about the state of my parish over the past few months to being unsure if I believe half of Catholic doctrine just since last weekend.
 
Hi,

Here’s my problem in a nutshell: I’m a convert from Evangelical Protestantism. I was a strong Christian my entire life. I was drawn to Catholicism over a number of years and then had a sudden pull to it 3 years ago at the same time that I discovered EWTN. I immersed myself in reading and discerning things and came to the conclusion that the Catholic Church was the one true Church founded by Jesus. I went through RCIA and became Catholic 2 years ago… . .

Fast forward to today. I feel like I’ve lost my Catholic faith. I feel like I don’t believe much of the Church’s teachings now. I am not doubting God or Christianity in general, just whether or not I should’ve stayed Protestant. I tell you, I truly am shocked at this turn of events. If someone had told me this was going to happen, I would not have believed it could because I know how I felt and I know what I believed up until a couple of months ago. I would’ve staked my life on the Church and its teachings.
It’s a pretty common phenomenon. I have avoided it by never actually converting, but it’s happened to me a number of times in the course of attempting to convert or thinking about converting. In other words, I understand psychologically what you are talking about–it’s just that I’ve never actually been in full communion with the Catholic Church.
I think most of it stems from two things: I have a very liberal priest. He came the parish after I became Catholic. He preaches things contrary to the Church’s teachings. I was enraged when this happened and I planned to find a better parish but then some other conservative people begged me to stay. I stayed. After awhile, I started to try and see things from the liberal priest’s perspective, and then I started to think liberal (by liberal, I probably should say “heretical”). Some of the things he taught were: women are denied equality in the Church, God can be called “mother”, God wants us in heaven so we’re all going to end up there. Stuff like that. Anyway, after flirting with liberalism myself because I didn’t fit in with some of the extremely conservative Catholics (the more Catholic than the Pope types), I came back to my senses and was enraged again that I didn’t quit this parish when I had the chance. Now I am involved in it too much to quit (I teach catechism and I don’t think I can quit it since it’s my duty to keep my word and it’s hard to find teachers).
If you become Catholic because of a conviction of the Church’s authority and a desire for an authoritative voice on doctrinal issues, then the actual situation within the Catholic Church can be extremely confusing. Again, this happened to me too, but in RCIA. My “liberalization” happened mostly after dropping out of RCIA and returning to the Episcopal Church. I’m not that liberal (by Episcopal standards, I’m very conservative), but fairly liberal by the standards of this forum. And yet, I continue to be drawn to orthodox Catholicism.
So I guess in a nutshell, I see lots of spiritual fruit from some Protestants and a lot of Evangelical Protestants know the Lord and know their Bible and love the Lord with their whole hearts and they are bearing much fruit despite the fact that they don’t have the Eucharist. Then I see other Catholics that have the Eucharist (which at this point, is the only thing I’m clinging to) and they don’t know anything about the Bible or Church teachings.
So the question is: does this negate the Catholic claim to have the fullness of the Faith?

I think that claim can be understood in a pretty limited way: that no Catholic dogma compromises the truth revealed in Jesus. So, for instance, Baptists have the doctrine of eternal security; low-church Protestants in general have a symbolic understanding of the sacraments; and so on. These compromise the deposit of faith; Catholic teachings don’t. That doesn’t mean that Catholicism as believed and practiced at any given time expresses the fullness of the faith. If that’s the Catholic claim, then Catholicism is clearly wrong. But I don’t think that is the Catholic claim.

That still leaves us in a quandary, though. We are drawn to Catholicism–you actually converted to it–because in principle it seems to have the fullness of the Faith. But when we don’t see that in practice, the question naturally arises: why not just remain with the broken bit of the Body of Christ we started with, if in fact in practice that’s all we ever have?

I’ve run up against this again in my most recent attempt to become Catholic. I’m not sure I can abandon Anglicanism–it’s not so much a problem with Catholicism as a refusal to say that Anglicanism is not also part of the Body of Christ (or if we take the Vatican II language of imperfect union, a refusal to abandon the imperfect for the theoretically perfect but practically just as imperfect).
And does this happen much? Do Catholic converts ever revert back to Protestantism???
Yes. Anecdotally, based both on these forums and on my experience in the “real world,” it happens quite often.

One possible approach is simply to say, “what matters for me is to be faithful to the church relations in which I now am, and leave the big questions to God.” That would leave me Anglican and you Catholic, even though we might both have serious misgivings in the future. . . .

You belong to an ancient Church which is unquestionably a significant and central part of the whole Body of Christ, a Church in which there are many means of grace. Use them, and don’t think you have to have everything figured out.

Edwin
 
I agree. There’s a prayer (I can’t remember which one - - maybe the Confiteor) where it appears the priest has the option of “brothers and sisters” or “brethren”. At the conservative parish, the priest says “brethren”. At my parish, we don’t even do the Confiteor (we just say or sing Lord haver mercy/Kyrie).
We do either/or in my parish. And come to think of it, we say "brothers and sister. Oh yay!

I had a thought while reading through some of the posts.

We are a church in transition just now. We are moving from the “old orthodoxy” to the “new orthodoxy” and it is definitely not comfortable for some. I have spoken in the past (now realizing quite uncharitably) about the desire of some for the Tridentine Mass and other such Latin expression. I really thought this was a throwback to Mass of my youth which few understood and certainly few participated in. Now I am seeing that those who prefer that really seem to educate themselves on the meaning and process of that Mass: they do deeply participate.

Along with that kind of Mass was an OT kind of legalism. Rather than have a real relationship with Jesus, we had forms and rubrics etc. With Vatican ll, that was supposed to change. And for many, it did.

Now we are 50 years from that event and surprise, the Church - that is the body of believers which includes people in the clergy - are still in transition.

We have been studying the Vll documents. Interesting. One thing pointed out early on is that earlier councils were defensive in nature. The Church was under attack, and the councils responded with definite statements of beliefs and expectations of actions. Vatican ll did not negate the teachings of the earlier councils, but did emphasize inclusion. It recognized the role of the laity in evangelization, and encouraged bible study (earlier it did not because of the general ignorance of reading and writing -hence a lot of the great art, bible study of the earlier era). It has only been about 200 years where general education meant more people reading and writing. Indeed, where I grew up there were still many people who did not continue school beyond 8th grade. The Church recognizes this change. We are now studying the Bible more. Yet the Mass and sacraments all contain some biblical references. We are taught at Mass over the three year cycles, much of the Old and New Testament with commentary by the homilist.

Well this is an extensive “thought”. Just know that the comments are mine, and are offered with all humility. I am no scholar of history, the Bible, or the Church.
 
So the question is: does this negate the Catholic claim to have the fullness of the Faith?
I think that claim can be understood in a pretty limited way: that no Catholic dogma compromises the truth revealed in Jesus. So, for instance, Baptists have the doctrine of eternal security; low-church Protestants in general have a symbolic understanding of the sacraments; and so on. These compromise the deposit of faith; Catholic teachings don’t. That doesn’t mean that Catholicism as believed and practiced at any given time expresses the fullness of the faith. If that’s the Catholic claim, then Catholicism is clearly wrong. But I don’t think that is the Catholic claim.
 
SetonGirl,

Please know that you are in my prayers.

God bless and I pray that He keeps you in the Church.
 
Hi,

Here’s my problem in a nutshell: I’m a convert from Evangelical Protestantism. I was a strong Christian my entire life. I was drawn to Catholicism over a number of years and then had a sudden pull to it 3 years ago at the same time that I discovered EWTN. I immersed myself in reading and discerning things and came to the conclusion that the Catholic Church was the one true Church founded by Jesus. I went through RCIA and became Catholic 2 years ago. I was excited and thankful for the grace of finding the Church. I truly believed everything the Chuch teaches. I was excited about the Eucharist. I started contemplating religious life and/or working for the Church as a teacher or lay minister sometime in the future. The desires of my heart changed for the better and I became a much more peaceful and forgiving person.

Fast forward to today. I feel like I’ve lost my Catholic faith. I feel like I don’t believe much of the Church’s teachings now. I am not doubting God or Christianity in general, just whether or not I should’ve stayed Protestant. I tell you, I truly am shocked at this turn of events. If someone had told me this was going to happen, I would not have believed it could because I know how I felt and I know what I believed up until a couple of months ago. I would’ve staked my life on the Church and its teachings.

I need to figure things out fast because I don’t want to feel like this. I don’t know what the exact cause of this is. I think most of it stems from two things: I have a very liberal priest. He came the parish after I became Catholic. He preaches things contrary to the Church’s teachings. I was enraged when this happened and I planned to find a better parish but then some other conservative people begged me to stay. I stayed. After awhile, I started to try and see things from the liberal priest’s perspective, and then I started to think liberal (by liberal, I probably should say “heretical”). Some of the things he taught were: women are denied equality in the Church, God can be called “mother”, God wants us in heaven so we’re all going to end up there. Stuff like that. Anyway, after flirting with liberalism myself because I didn’t fit in with some of the extremely conservative Catholics (the more Catholic than the Pope types), I came back to my senses and was enraged again that I didn’t quit this parish when I had the chance. Now I am involved in it too much to quit (I teach catechism and I don’t think I can quit it since it’s my duty to keep my word and it’s hard to find teachers).

A friend of mine wrote to the priest to address his heretical ideas but got no response. My friend then wrote to the Bishop and got no response. I think I started to get bitter and doubtful about the faith after seeing that the Bishop doesn’t seem care.

The second thing that may be causing my doubts is that when I see that the majority of the other parishoners are not bothered by my priest’s liberalism. I’ve started to wonder if anyone knows their faith or even cares (I’m generalizing, I know). And then adding further confusion, I joined a group of supposedly conservative Catholics who meet to discuss doctrine and I’m taken aback by some of the things they do and say and it confuses me because I know Protestants that are more clean living than them.

So I guess in a nutshell, I see lots of spiritual fruit from some Protestants and a lot of Evangelical Protestants know the Lord and know their Bible and love the Lord with their whole hearts and they are bearing much fruit despite the fact that they don’t have the Eucharist. Then I see other Catholics that have the Eucharist (which at this point, is the only thing I’m clinging to) and they don’t know anything about the Bible or Church teachings.

I’ve rambled some and I don’t intend any disrespect to anyone here. I’m baring my heart in the hopes that I can get some advice because I’m heart broken about the way my thoughts and beliefs are messed up.

I don’t know who I can talk to about this because I’m ashamed that I feel like this. I alluded to some of this during Confession with a conservative priest but he basically said it’s no wonder I’m mixed up based on the liberal priest stuff. But that Confession was a month ago and I initially felt better after it and now in the past week, I feel worse.

Thanks for listening.😦

And does this happen much? Do Catholic converts ever revert back to Protestantism???
I am sorry to hear about your difficulties.

First of all, and this is important, the difference between Protestant and Catholic service is that the REAL Eucharist is present at a Catholic mass.

You are not receiving Jesus at a Protestant service.

Secondly, I would strongly recommend that you find a new, more conservative parish.Perhaps the same one you went to confession at?

You’re not alone here either. My wife has little tolerance for liberal priests as well. She often wonders why Protestants have it in the right politically much more so than Catholics.

Now, I realize that may require more time and travel, but it’d be a terrible waste for you to throw your faith away, especially since the issue is with someone else misrepresenting the faith who should not be.

So, I think the solution here is turn away from the mis-representative preaching, not from Jesus.

God Bless, and know you are in our prayers.
 
Thanks, Pax, for your prayers.

Contrarini, yes, you hit the nail on the head about why i’m confused . . . one reason I became Catholic was because I thought it was the one true Church and I liked the idea that there was a one authority on doctrinal issues.

I am still trying to p(name removed by moderator)oint what and how my current state of doubt happened. It was smoldering for a few months off and on and then last week - - wham! I felt like someone flicked a switch or something and my thinking of religious issues was completely changed. I’ve contemplated various doctrines and issues ove the years (before I was Catholic) and I’ve never experienced going through a sudden shift in belief or thoughts before. I just don’t get it.
 
“Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture, then are bound closely together and communicate one with the other. For both of them, flowing out from the same divine well-spring, come together in some fashion to form one thing and move towards the same goal. Each of them makes present and fruitful in the Church the mystery of Christ, who promised to remain whith his own ‘always, to the close of the age’. Sacred Scripture is the speech of God as it is put down in wiritin under the breath of the Holy Spirit. And [Holy] Tradition transmits in its entirety the Word of God which has been entrusted to the apostles by Christ the Lord and the holy Spirit. It transmits it to the successors of the apostles so that, enlightened by the Spirit of truth, they may faithfully preserve, expound, and spread it abroad by their preaching.” (CCC 80-81)

My dear one, please begin to read the Catechism - you can get it downloaded daily to your email from flocknote.com It’s one of the things the Holy Father has asked all Catholics to do during the Year of Faith. It will help so much with the doubts. Also, you can download the Epistles of St. Ignatius of Antioch for free - I forget which site, but you can just search it. The issues in the Church today are no different from some of the ones he wrote about back then. (He was a disciple of John the Beloved, aka St. John the Evangelist) Cling to the true church teaching, not what some liberal priest is teaching. The first chance you get, find a parish that teaches in line with the Bible, the Catechism and is faithful to the Magesterium. This is a crisis of faith for you. I went through one, too, about 2 years after I became Catholic. Then I realized, like St. Peter, where would I go? Here are the words of eternal life. When the doubts come, pray the Prayer to St. Michael and let him fight the enemy that is trying to lead you astray. Then beg the Blessed Mother to hold you, the Father to hide you under his wings, and all of them to protect you from the onslaught. The priest you made your confession to I would advise calling and just setting up an appointment with him to meet and talk over your situation. Even if finding a spiritual director proves difficult, you can always call for an appointment with a priest to talk about anything you want. You may have to wait a few weeks due to a full schedule, but if you say you want to make an appointment with Fr. Whoever, they’ll schedule you in.
My prayers are with you. Fly to the cross, let the Blessed Mother hold you.
Kris
 
Thanks for your prayers, klm120861.

I have to say, I have been reading my Catechism and I daily read the Bible. My doubts got worse as I starting gettting into the Catechism more.

I’m really feeling how I used to feel as a Protestant on Sola Scriptura. I having doubts about the Church’s authority in pronouncing certain sins. I should explain, I’m not looking for a reason to sin or anything - - but I’m looking at small things like Lent and eating meat on Fridays, and I’m struggling to understand how one could be guilty of disobeying God by eating meat on a Friday especially since St. Paul wrote so much about Christians not being bound by the Law any more. And then I’ve been following some of the rhetoric about Christians and voting and I shudder at the following quote from EWTN’s website at: ewtn.com/vote/brief_catechism.htm

"14. Is it a mortal sin to vote for a pro-abortion candidate?

Except in the case in which a voter is faced with all pro-abortion candidates (in which case, as explained in question 8 above, he or she strives to determine which of them would cause the let damage in this regard), a candidate that is pro-abortion disqualifies himself from receiving a Catholic’s vote. This is because being pro-abortion cannot simply be placed alongside the candidate’s other positions on Medicare and unemployment, for example; and this is because abortion is intrinsically evil and cannot be morally justified for any reason or set of circumstances. To vote for such a candidate even with the knowledge that the candidate is pro-abortion is to become an accomplice in the moral evil of abortion. If the voter also knows this, then the voter sins mortally."

I’m not saying I support any pro-abortion politicians - - I don’t want to discuss actual candidates in this thread. But I’m shuddering at the idea that a Church can pronounce something like voting a sin. I was watching EWTN last night and they said choosing not to vote could also be a sin. It made me think that things are getting so out of hand and I believe that only God can condemn someone to Hell so I don’t know if EWTN has just gone bananas on this issue or if the Pope would agree that the way a person votes could end them up in Hell.

I don’t want to get off topic but this voting stuff has happened at the same time as I’m struggling with Sacred Tradition on some issues.
 
This can happen and do not be surprised. I am a convert also. I spent 3 years studying the Catholic faith and convinced as you have been of the Catholic faith. What brought me into the Church was NOT ever, ever, people in the Church, it was the Eucharist and the REAL presence of Jesus there. THAT YOU MUST HOLD ON TO!!! He IS really present, I have no doubt He is present in the Catholic Church. I too was evangelical and yes, many dear sincere believers in Christ for sure, but in the depth and fullness of the Christian faith is the Catholic Church whether we see it or not. God revealed this to us and we must stand strong in this. To be “swayed” otherwise would in my view be a pull of the evil one to draw us away from this fullness of faith and the Eucharist. We can for sure stand together in faith with our brothers and sisters in Christ in the Evangelical churches but now have a responsibility to stay where HE has shown us to do otherwise would be a sin. Please stand strong and go to more orthodox teachers if you are being pulled into the liberal theological elements of the Catholic church…please look and trust Christ’s direction here. He is counting on you to be strong in these times we live in. My prayers for you and PM me if you need to.

In Christ and His Church with love,
mlz
 
Thanks for your prayers, klm120861.

I have to say, I have been reading my Catechism and I daily read the Bible. My doubts got worse as I starting gettting into the Catechism more.

I’m really feeling how I used to feel as a Protestant on Sola Scriptura. I having doubts about the Church’s authority in pronouncing certain sins. I should explain, I’m not looking for a reason to sin or anything - - but I’m looking at small things like Lent and eating meat on Fridays, and I’m struggling to understand how one could be guilty of disobeying God by eating meat on a Friday especially since St. Paul wrote so much about Christians not being bound by the Law any more. And then I’ve been following some of the rhetoric about Christians and voting and I shudder at the following quote from EWTN’s website at: ewtn.com/vote/brief_catechism.htm

"14. Is it a mortal sin to vote for a pro-abortion candidate?

Except in the case in which a voter is faced with all pro-abortion candidates (in which case, as explained in question 8 above, he or she strives to determine which of them would cause the let damage in this regard), a candidate that is pro-abortion disqualifies himself from receiving a Catholic’s vote. This is because being pro-abortion cannot simply be placed alongside the candidate’s other positions on Medicare and unemployment, for example; and this is because abortion is intrinsically evil and cannot be morally justified for any reason or set of circumstances. To vote for such a candidate even with the knowledge that the candidate is pro-abortion is to become an accomplice in the moral evil of abortion. If the voter also knows this, then the voter sins mortally."

I’m not saying I support any pro-abortion politicians - - I don’t want to discuss actual candidates in this thread. But I’m shuddering at the idea that a Church can pronounce something like voting a sin. I was watching EWTN last night and they said choosing not to vote could also be a sin. It made me think that things are getting so out of hand and I believe that only God can condemn someone to Hell so I don’t know if EWTN has just gone bananas on this issue or if the Pope would agree that the way a person votes could end them up in Hell.

I don’t want to get off topic but this voting stuff has happened at the same time as I’m struggling with Sacred Tradition on some issues.
The Church does not “create” sins. God does, as you have correctly noted. However, the Church defines sins by providing authoritative guidance as to the circumstances under which one can commit a sin. Here is a biblical situation in which voting was a sin:

[BIBLEDRB]Mark 15:12-14[/BIBLEDRB]

Voting for the death of the innocenct is something that requires repentance–therefore it is a sin.

[BIBLEDRB]Acts 2:22-23[/BIBLEDRB]
[BIBLEDRB]Acts 2:37-38[/BIBLEDRB]

One very grave sin that the Israelites constantly committed, and which earned them God’s wrath, was the murder of infants:

[BIBLEDRB]Leviticus 18:21[/BIBLEDRB]
[BIBLEDRB]Leviticus 20:2[/BIBLEDRB]

The penalty for sacrificing children to an idol is death. Abortion, of course, is the sacrifice of a child to some idol like education, career, reputation, and so on. None of those things is idolatrous in and of themselves, but when one of them makes them more important than an innocent human life and so kills such a life, that is exactly what the Israelites did and for which God ordered them to die.

So, the Church is not making this up when She says voting for abortion is grave matter and can be a mortal sin. As with all other Catholic doctrine, there is a strong biblical foundation. So, even if you were to fall back into a sola-scriptura framework, you would not be able to refute any Catholic teaching, be it on sin or anything else. But you aren’t out to do that, nor should you.

I think your real problem is scrupulosity. You are in doubt about what your obligations to God are and you’ve become confused about where to look for authority and guidance. You sincerely do not want to offend God but you don’t know what He is asking of you. I would strongly suggest you read over this List of Ten Commandments for the Scrupulous and see if there is anything in there that would help you.
 
Thanks for your prayers, klm120861.

I have to say, I have been reading my Catechism and I daily read the Bible. My doubts got worse as I starting gettting into the Catechism more.

I’m really feeling how I used to feel as a Protestant on Sola Scriptura. I having doubts about the Church’s authority in pronouncing certain sins. I should explain, I’m not looking for a reason to sin or anything - - but I’m looking at small things like Lent and eating meat on Fridays, and I’m struggling to understand how one could be guilty of disobeying God by eating meat on a Friday especially since St. Paul wrote so much about Christians not being bound by the Law any more. And then I’ve been following some of the rhetoric about Christians and voting and I shudder at the following quote from EWTN’s website at: ewtn.com/vote/brief_catechism.htm

"14. Is it a mortal sin to vote for a pro-abortion candidate?

Except in the case in which a voter is faced with all pro-abortion candidates (in which case, as explained in question 8 above, he or she strives to determine which of them would cause the let damage in this regard), a candidate that is pro-abortion disqualifies himself from receiving a Catholic’s vote. This is because being pro-abortion cannot simply be placed alongside the candidate’s other positions on Medicare and unemployment, for example; and this is because abortion is intrinsically evil and cannot be morally justified for any reason or set of circumstances. To vote for such a candidate even with the knowledge that the candidate is pro-abortion is to become an accomplice in the moral evil of abortion. If the voter also knows this, then the voter sins mortally."

I’m not saying I support any pro-abortion politicians - - I don’t want to discuss actual candidates in this thread. But I’m shuddering at the idea that a Church can pronounce something like voting a sin. I was watching EWTN last night and they said choosing not to vote could also be a sin. It made me think that things are getting so out of hand and I believe that only God can condemn someone to Hell so I don’t know if EWTN has just gone bananas on this issue or if the Pope would agree that the way a person votes could end them up in Hell.

I don’t want to get off topic but this voting stuff has happened at the same time as I’m struggling with Sacred Tradition on some issues.
Regarding the sin of eating meat in Friday during lent: This is a Church discipline that we follow out of obedience in the same way a child obeys her parents. There is nothing inherently wrong with eating meat on Friday. It is the “house rule,” as it were. My parents had a rule against running in the house. There is nothing objectively wrong with running in a house, but it would have been sin for me to disobey their rule. My parents did not create the sinful gravity of disobedience; it would have been a violation of the commandment to honor them. That commandment actually applies to all authority: parents, government, Magesterium (

On the EWTN excerpt: Remember that EWTN is not authoritative (though they certainly are reliable). The things they write might not be balanced fully. The idea is that if you know that by casting a vote in a certain way you would be providing material support for someone who promotes a grave evil like abortion, then that vote can be sinful. If a Catholic, though no fault of his own, either does not know the candidate’s position or does not have adequate understanding over its gravity, then it may be that he does not sin in that vote.

HTH
 
As a non-Catholic moving toward Catholicism, the issues that you brought up are of great concern. I have had fears about attending a Catholic church and finding out that it is more liberal than the Unitarian church. However, I would say that the problems you describe are a fallout of the human condition. There is a latent human tendency toward wanting to create a god in our own image. I have attended many Protestant churches since being “ambushed by Christ” over twenty years ago and the same type of problems exist in the sanctuaries of Protestant churches and seminaries. Indeed, within the last ten years, the explosion of PowerPoint preachers, a self-help gospel, light shows and the Sunday rock concert replete with Starbucks coffee, has made the situation exponentially worse in Protestantism. Protestants live in the era of the numbers-driven church and orthodox teaching is often seen as an impediment to “seekers.” Rarely will you hear a balanced message of grace and truth. Mostly, it is a message that directs the faithful into how they can get the most “goodies” from God. There is no structure, Magesterium, or overarching church authority in the Protestant realm. I’ve seen churches merely pull out of their denominations and become non-denominational if confronted by denominational authority. There is always a battle between orthodoxy and apostasy. It would seem that the potential for apostasy would be much greater in the Protestant realm due to the vacuum of authority. Perhaps, if no action is taken in regards to this liberal priest, you could continue up the chain of command addressing your concerns. But I would not give up on your journey and return to Egypt. The grass is not greener back here. In fact, it is brown and withering from Truth’s drought.
 
Cat Herder, you don’t have to convince me on the evils of abortion. I am very much pro-life from conception to natural death. It’s just that I think it’s dangerous for any church or church leaders or (religious leaders of any world religion) to weigh in on politics to the point that they start threatening hell fire if a person votes for a certain candidate or in the case of EWTN, even if a person chooses to not vote at all. After all, Jesus did not get involved in politics and that was one reason Judas, a Zealot, was mad. He expected the Messiah to weild a sword.

Cat Herder, thank you for the link to the Commandments for the scrupulous. I’ve seen that before sometime in the past. It’s a useful resource but I really don’t think I’m scrupulous – I think I’m just scared of not knowing which way God is calling me. Those who leave Protestantism for the Catholic Church and those who leave the Catholic Church for Protestantism are equally convinced and passionate about their decision. I’m just so confused about whether I was right as a Protestant or now as a Catholic.
Regarding the sin of eating meat in Friday during lent: This is a Church discipline that we follow out of obedience in the same way a child obeys her parents. There is nothing inherently wrong with eating meat on Friday. It is the “house rule,” as it were. My parents had a rule against running in the house. There is nothing objectively wrong with running in a house, but it would have been sin for me to disobey their rule. My parents did not create the sinful gravity of disobedience; it would have been a violation of the commandment to honor them. That commandment actually applies to all authority: parents, government, Magesterium (
HTH
I don’t even like most meats, so it hasn’t been a hardship for me to follow this rule, but as I was reading my Bible last week and St. Paul was talking about the Law and foods and how Christians are not bound by the Law then I am now having trouble in discerning the logic of submitting to a rule that wasn’t an issue for the apostles. Again, I can’t explain it – I would have gladly defended the fasting and abstinence rules up until a couple of weeks ago.
As a non-Catholic moving toward Catholicism, the issues that you brought up are of great concern. I have had fears about attending a Catholic church and finding out that it is more liberal than the Unitarian church. However, I would say that the problems you describe are a fallout of the human condition. There is a latent human tendency toward wanting to create a god in our own image. I have attended many Protestant churches since being “ambushed by Christ” over twenty years ago and the same type of problems exist in the sanctuaries of Protestant churches and seminaries. Indeed, within the last ten years, the explosion of PowerPoint preachers, a self-help gospel, light shows and the Sunday rock concert replete with Starbucks coffee, has made the situation exponentially worse in Protestantism. Protestants live in the era of the numbers-driven church and orthodox teaching is often seen as an impediment to “seekers.” Rarely will you hear a balanced message of grace and truth. Mostly, it is a message that directs the faithful into how they can get the most “goodies” from God. There is no structure, Magesterium, or overarching church authority in the Protestant realm. I’ve seen churches merely pull out of their denominations and become non-denominational if confronted by denominational authority. There is always a battle between orthodoxy and apostasy. It would seem that the potential for apostasy would be much greater in the Protestant realm due to the vacuum of authority. Perhaps, if no action is taken in regards to this liberal priest, you could continue up the chain of command addressing your concerns. But I would not give up on your journey and return to Egypt. The grass is not greener back here. In fact, it is brown and withering from Truth’s drought.
I hear you on the powerpoint and Starbucks - - those were reasons that I left the Evangelical movement. However, when I think of the lost souls and wonder about how they will hear the Gospel, it seems the Evangelicals are doing a better job at preaching the Gospel than the Catholic Church. I’m generalizing and there are exceptions, I realize. But that’s not my reason for having doubts in the Church, per se. I’m just hard-pressed to explain the fruits and the obvious signs of regeneration that I see in some Evangelicals if the Catholic Church is the one, true Church alone.

I’ve done a lot of reflecting on how I ended up in this crisis of faith - - one thing that I remember happened earlier this year. I attended a workshop on Consecration to Mary. I was turned off at the core of my being when I heard people talking about becoming slaves to Mary, etc. I mean no offense to anyone here - - I’m just bringing this up because I’m trying to put the puzzle pieces together to figure out what’s going on in my belief system.
 
I’ve done a lot of reflecting on how I ended up in this crisis of faith - - one thing that I remember happened earlier this year. I attended a workshop on Consecration to Mary. I was turned off at the core of my being when I heard people talking about becoming slaves to Mary, etc. I mean no offense to anyone here - - I’m just bringing this up because I’m trying to put the puzzle pieces together to figure out what’s going on in my belief system.
Many converts to Catholicism struggle with the concept of veneration of Mary and other Saints. We are not required to follow any particular devotion, outside the Sacraments and the Mass. On Marcus Grodi’s program, “The Journey Home,” I heard a caller ask one convert how he came to accept devotion to Mary. He responded that he didn’t. His reasons for conversion were completely independent of devotions.

In the passage you referenced from St. Paul, where he discusses the suitability of meat for consumption, recall that he, himself, was essentially a vegetarian when on his missions, so as not to scandalize the weak (those who associated meat with idolatry). He actually encouraged others to do likewise.

In your case, you probably should abstain from such devotions since they are a weakness for you.
 
Cat Herder, you don’t have to convince me on the evils of abortion. I am very much pro-life from conception to natural death. It’s just that I think it’s dangerous for any church or church leaders or (religious leaders of any world religion) to weigh in on politics to the point that they start threatening hell fire if a person votes for a certain candidate or in the case of EWTN, even if a person chooses to not vote at all. After all, Jesus did not get involved in politics and that was one reason Judas, a Zealot, was mad. He expected the Messiah to weild a sword.

Cat Herder, thank you for the link to the Commandments for the scrupulous. I’ve seen that before sometime in the past. It’s a useful resource but I really don’t think I’m scrupulous – I think I’m just scared of not knowing which way God is calling me. Those who leave Protestantism for the Catholic Church and those who leave the Catholic Church for Protestantism are equally convinced and passionate about their decision. I’m just so confused about whether I was right as a Protestant or now as a Catholic.

I don’t even like most meats, so it hasn’t been a hardship for me to follow this rule, but as I was reading my Bible last week and St. Paul was talking about the Law and foods and how Christians are not bound by the Law then I am now having trouble in discerning the logic of submitting to a rule that wasn’t an issue for the apostles. Again, I can’t explain it – I would have gladly defended the fasting and abstinence rules up until a couple of weeks ago.

I hear you on the powerpoint and Starbucks - - those were reasons that I left the Evangelical movement. However, when I think of the lost souls and wonder about how they will hear the Gospel, it seems the Evangelicals are doing a better job at preaching the Gospel than the Catholic Church. I’m generalizing and there are exceptions, I realize. But that’s not my reason for having doubts in the Church, per se. I’m just hard-pressed to explain the fruits and the obvious signs of regeneration that I see in some Evangelicals if the Catholic Church is the one, true Church alone.

I’ve done a lot of reflecting on how I ended up in this crisis of faith - - one thing that I remember happened earlier this year. I attended a workshop on Consecration to Mary. I was turned off at the core of my being when I heard people talking about becoming slaves to Mary, etc. I mean no offense to anyone here - - I’m just bringing this up because I’m trying to put the puzzle pieces together to figure out what’s going on in my belief system.
I agree that the Catholic laity has been failing to preach the Gospel. Very much so. But the Church has gone through quite a storm over the past century (or few). The Enlightenment and Reformation rocked it a few centuries ago, and now the New Atheism, a revival of relativism, the Sexual Revolution, Secular Humanism, and all sorts of evils are appearing as Satan rallies his forces against God’s Church. But you must remember, first, that dark times have come over the Church before, and still She survived and thrived. And second, you must know that it is a new Springtime in the Church, when the faithful rally against evil, and evangelize the world.

There are many opportunities to evangelize. I am involved in FOCUS (Fellowship of Catholic University Students), and we seek to evangelize both fallen Christians and non-believers alike on college campuses. There are also many other opportunities to evangelize.

Right now, you are seeing the darkness of our fallen world, and because Satan uses the darkness against those who seek the light, he makes it seem darker than it really is. Be at peace! Know that Christ’s light is here, it is in the Church. Many are fallen, but now is the time to reawaken them! Now is the time for mighty deeds and great love! Do not despair in the evils of the world, but instead rejoice in Christ. Let not your heart be troubled. Fear and doubt will come (as they have to me, and all), but they will pass away. Christ and His Church will be forever.

Don’t be afraid, SetonGirl. Persevere. Reach out to those fallen away. The New Evangelization is at hand. Be a part of it!
 
Hello SetonGirl. Sorry I didn’t respond to your email. I had technical difficulties:). I just emailed you again.

May God bless you on your walk with Him!
 
Those who leave Protestantism for the Catholic Church and those who leave the Catholic Church for Protestantism are equally convinced and passionate about their decision. I’m just so confused about whether I was right as a Protestant or now as a Catholic.
Well, if it’s just a question of who is right in terms of Scripture, that’s very easy to answer. To be a Protestant you must either (1) believe that Jesus allowed the “Christian Church” to apostasize and become Catholic, leaving everyone without knowledge of the truth until Luther came along a thousand years later–or (2) you must be ignorant of what the Catholic Church is. Position (2) is quite common and a person who is ignorant is not guilty of being a schismatic or a heretic or anything… but position (1) is simply ridiculous because God has promised:

[BIBLEDRB]1 Tim 2:3-4[/BIBLEDRB]

So… if God allowed such a great apostasy to occur–and remember, that must have happened for the Protestants to be right–why should we believe ANY of the Bible? After all, God can’t be trusted if He wills everyone to be saved and come to knowledge of the truth, but then makes it impossible for anyone to know what the truth is. Bottom line: If you trust Jesus to keep His promises then there’s no way you can be a Protestant unless you are ignorant.
However, when I think of the lost souls and wonder about how they will hear the Gospel, it seems the Evangelicals are doing a better job at preaching the Gospel than the Catholic Church.
Well, what do you mean by “preach the Gospel?” Actually, those Evangelicals generally don’t even baptize; instead they have the Sinner’s Prayer. But where is the Sinner’s Prayer in the Bible? It isn’t there. They say “you Catholics earn your salvation by works” but then they demand that everybody do a work (read the Bible, say the Sinner’s Prayer, accept Jesus etc.) in order to earn their salvation… So sure, they preach a gospel, but is that gospel Biblical? Didn’t Jesus do all the work? So why does He only save people who have a correct belief system and who do certain things? What about babies? Are they saved? Evangelicals say yes, but where does it say in the Bible that they need to be saved again by saying the Sinner’s Prayer once they hit a certain age? (It doesn’t!)… **There is no coherence whatsoever to the Evangelical method of salvation. ** I did a thorough writeup on this whole issue over here. Or you could just read 1 Peter 3:21… it says very plainly that Baptism saves you.
I attended a workshop on Consecration to Mary. I was turned off at the core of my being when I heard people talking about becoming slaves to Mary
If God is your Father, then Jesus is your Brother. Then Who is your Mother? So no, you weren’t “turned off at the core of your being” because at “the core of your being” you are a child of Mary. That force that made you afraid was something external to the core of your being–maybe even demonic. After all, only the devil deals in fear.
I mean no offense to anyone here - - I’m just bringing this up because I’m trying to put the puzzle pieces together to figure out what’s going on in my belief system.
You need to (1) stop being afraid; (2) pray; and (3) study the Bible. Use my Quick Answers to help you get started. It’s all in there: salvation, the Sacraments, Mary, everything. In fact, here are the ones you need:

Prove to me that the Catholic Church is the Church that Jesus founded

Prove relics, shrines, saints and the Rosary are not pagan

Prove to me that God is good (Justification)

Prove that I have Free Will

I said the Sinner’s Prayer–good enough?

Oh… so then how do I go to Heaven?

Prove that I need Catholicism if I have a Personal Relationship with Jesus

Prove that Rituals Have Power

Prove that I need Baptism

Prove that I need the Eucharist and Confession to a Priest

Why Can’t I Go By the Bible Alone? (long ver.)

Where did the Bible come from?

Where does the Bible say to have statues and call priests Father etc…

Prove Prayer to Saints is Biblical

Prove Mary is my Mother

Where does the Bible say that Mary is …

Why does it matter that Mary is ever-virgin?

Prove the Immaculate Conception (Mary never sinned)

Prove the Assumption (Mary never died)
 
Well, what do you mean by “preach the Gospel?” Actually, those Evangelicals generally don’t even baptize; instead they have the Sinner’s Prayer. But where is the Sinner’s Prayer in the Bible? It isn’t there. They say “you Catholics earn your salvation by works” but then they demand that everybody do a work (read the Bible, say the Sinner’s Prayer, accept Jesus etc.) in order to earn their salvation… So sure, they preach a gospel, but is that gospel Biblical? Didn’t Jesus do all the work? So why does He only save people who have a correct belief system and who do certain things? What about babies? Are they saved? Evangelicals say yes, but where does it say in the Bible that they need to be saved again by saying the Sinner’s Prayer once they hit a certain age? (It doesn’t!)… **There is no coherence whatsoever to the Evangelical method of salvation. ** I did a thorough writeup on this whole issue over here. Or you could just read 1 Peter 3:21… it says very plainly that Baptism saves you.

If God is your Father, then Jesus is your Brother. Then Who is your Mother? So no, you weren’t “turned off at the core of your being” because at “the core of your being” you are a child of Mary. That force that made you afraid was something external to the core of your being–maybe even demonic. After all, only the devil deals in fear.
Thank you for the links. I will check them out in due time. You suggest that I read the Bible and pray. I’ve been faithfully doing that my entire life so I will continue to do that while I struggle with discerning the Truth.

As for suggesting that God allowed apostasy in order to explain Protestantism. I don’t buy that. You said that in order for Protestants to be right then no one had the truth until Luther. But what about the 11th century and the great schism with the Orthodox. Luther wasn’t the first to leave. My main issue with comparing Protestants to Catholics is that it’s clear to me that there are people in Protestant churches that are serving God and it’s also clear that God blesses these people. At the very least, I think some renewal and reform is needed within our Church.

When I spoke about Evangelicals preaching the Gospel, I’m referring to the preaching that draws sinners to convert. People need to hear that (a) God loves them; (b) each person is a sinner; (c) salvation is offerred to all through Jesus’ sacrifice. People need to repent and follow God. That’s what I was saying. Does this conflict with our Church’s teachings in any way? I’m not advocating formulaic prayers for salvation. I’m talking about a true conversion of the heart away from sin and trusting in Jesus’ sacrifice. Please tell me if this is wrong. I know Catholics that don’t know that God loves them and they don’t know that they are called to conversion. i’m not saying all Catholics are like this but the fact that there are people in the Church who don’t know the basic stuff is alarming and needs to rectified.

I take offense to your tone and accusation regarding my discomfort from the Marian consecration workshop. I am not involved with the demonic in any way. If I hear people saying that they want to be Mary’s slave and that they don’t pray to Jesus but rather choose to access Him through Mary, then it sounds like they are preaching “a different Gospel”. See Galatians 1:8 “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.” (Douay-Rheims). God is my Father, Jesus is my Lord and Savior, the Holy Spirit is my Comforter and Counselor. I admire Mary and look to her as a perfect example of how one should follow God but she is a created being and I cannot regard her in the same way I do for the Holy Trinity. I cannot become a created being’s slave because I belong to the Lord and He is my only Master. That’s how I look at this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top