B
bmaz
Guest
Anyone here who converted from RCC to the Orthodox Church? I’m wondering what were your reasons for doing so and how has it changed your life?
You might want to look up Rod Dreher. He’s a famous case.Anyone here who converted from RCC to the Orthodox Church? I’m wondering what were your reasons for doing so and how has it changed your life?
True, though that is more of a conclusion they come to rather than an actual reason. Effect more than cause.A fourth reason would be that they recognize the Orthodox Church as the true Church of Christ - in all fairness.
I have profound respect for our Orthodox brothers, and cherish their history and tradition, but it would take a lot more than that for me to leave one “lung” to go to the other. I guess it’s possible to convert for reasons that do not include some form of rejection of or, at least, dissatisfaction with the RCC, but I’m not sure if it occurs that often. Curious if any other posters will have a story like that.Agreed, but a lot of Catholics have kind of a weird yet very profound authentic attachment to ‘Eastern sprituality’ ‘their other lung’.
Yet, Here’s what scripture and tradition says about schismbmaz:![]()
You might want to look up Rod Dreher. He’s a famous case.Anyone here who converted from RCC to the Orthodox Church? I’m wondering what were your reasons for doing so and how has it changed your life?
As for reasons, the ones I’ve seen usually come down to two things:
A third reason that I have encountered once or twice is that they are divorced and remarried.
- They prefer the Orthodox Liturgy.
- They find the Catholic Church too “liberal”, especially on LGBT issues.
Says who? Show me a Church document properly referenced, that permits a Catholic to become an Eastern Orthodox of some type, with no consequences to them.That’s a very dishonest misrepresentation and distortion of Church teachings on the Orthodox, and totally contrary to Church teaching. Lumen gentium does not say what you want it to say. At all.
??? Can you clarify what you mean here? I’m a bit confused. Do you mean they separate them to keep them from leaving the church early on?Especially visible in how they divide the Sacraments of initiation to young ones, purely to try to keep them from not returning to church.
This is definitely something I’ve noticed as well. I enjoy the Eastern theology behind the Incarnation as well.Also the clear manner in which the Orthodox Church teaches the purpose of the Incarnation is missing in my opinion in Latin RCCs.
Yes. I thought the sentence didn’t sound right myself. What I mean is that from the RCC side, the only reason they wait until high school for confirmation is so that they kind of force parents to keep their kids involved in the Church if they want them to be confirmed. It is like holding confirmation hostage in fear that if they confirmed infants, no one would continue going to church afterward. I’ve heard youth teachers say they think that it is great that they do this because otherwise they would be out of a job because no one would be going to youth classes. Having 3 young ones under 5, I really wanted my children to have the benefit of the sacraments of Holy Chrismation (Confirmation) and Holy Eucharist from infancy to help grow spiritually just as fleshly food will help them grow physically. And if the gift of Chrismation is needed to live a Christian life, how would it make sense for my children to go through middle school, which I think was when I went in a downward path, without this gift? That on top of the fact that they purposely do not do a triple immersion for baptism even though that was the method that all Christians did from the beginning symbolizing our sharing in Christ’s death 3 days in the tomb, water being similar to earth.??? Can you clarify what you mean here? I’m a bit confused. Do you mean they separate them to keep them from leaving the church early on?
That’s a BIG LOL.They find the Catholic Church too “liberal”, especially on LGBT issues.