T
Truthstalker
Guest
Internal reformation of the Catholic church was occuring independently of Luther - probably not at the pace that was needed, but it was being worked on. By “authorized” I mean no Pope, bishop, prelate, abbot or other authority asked Luther to take up the task of reforming the church.I like your list! I would be careful with number 16. Luther (he was a priest) certainly did have a right to bring reform to the church and the church badly needed reform. What he didn’t have a right to do was try to change the structure or teachings of the church. You may want to word that differently.
Ask yourself what would have happened had the Church and Luther not blown the opportunity to do things right and Luther had been employed as a reformer from within the Catholic Church, and brought his considerable gifts to bear in removing corruption and restoring piety to the Church rather than attacking it from without. Calvin and others would have remained Catholic, I imagine, and his gifts, among others, would have been used to improve the Catholic church. I think we would have seen a lot less bloodshed and a Church that would have benefited from the zeal of the reformation applied not to the development of a Christianity outside the Church but to its internal reformation, which it badly needed and received, notably later at the Council of Trent. Perhaps there would have been a Council of Trent, and its focus might have been similar, but the energies expended against the Protestants could have been better spent on developing holiness among the people and clergy.