A
Adamski
Guest
Here in Seattle catholic school costs 9,000 a year that makes it seem like catholic schools are only obtained by the mega rich. That doesn’t seem moral
What’s wrong with that? There are certain schools for some people and certain schools for others.Sounds like a country club for Kenedy Catholics
Juan and Jacek need not apply for at least 4-5 generations please
What an appallingly wrong comment. For starters, $9,000 a year does not a “country club” make. Historically, the Kennedys wouldn’t be caught near a Catholic school. And you insult the hard-working parents who undoubtedly sacrifice to send their children to Catholic school by categorizing them as “Kennedy Catholics,” given that that term has come to mean hypocritically barely-practicing Catholics in name only, for the most part. Finally, your “Juan and Jacek” snark implies a racist motivation which is libelous.Sounds like a country club for Kenedy Catholics
Juan and Jacek need not apply for at least 4-5 generations please
Did those sisters all want to teach or were they forced to work as teachers to pay for their expenses?After the sisters stopped teaching, it got a lot more expensive.
Why are you asking us? How would any of us know?Did those sisters all want to teach or were they forced to work as teachers to pay for their expenses?
Does anyone know why nuns (and monks?) stopped teaching in Catholic schools? It seems if they were educated enough and cost effective labor, they would have been a work force you’d want to utilize.After the sisters stopped teaching, it got a lot more expensive.
My father had a sister, Sr. Josephine. She “kicked the habit” so to speak and entered a life of sin.Does anyone know why nuns (and monks?) stopped teaching in Catholic schools? It seems if they were educated enough and cost effective labor, they would have been a work force you’d want to utilize.
It is not entirely a mystery why there is a lack of nuns qualifyed to teach children today. I am asking you because you either should ask yourself about this, or try to imagine how you could lower tuition if you were the principal of any catholic school.Why are you asking us? How would any of us know?
Why does it matter if they wanted to teach? At the school I attended the nuns use to be everywhere, administration, classrooms, maintenance, nurse’s office, secretarial, finance. There were many options for a sister who felt that teaching wasn’t her mission. Of course, I don’t see why a sister would discern a vocation to a religious Order that’s charism was to teach if she thought she didn’t want to teach.It is not entirely a mystery why there is a lack of nuns qualifyed to teach children today. I am asking you because you either should ask yourself about this, or try to imagine how you could lower tuition if you were the principal of any catholic school.
You cut costs.
Nuns cost what?
What were they paid to teach? How many of them even wanted to teach…
Have you checked out John F. Kennedy Memorial Catholic High School in lovely Burien at Seattle’s southern city limits? All three of my kids went there, and it was no way near $9,000 a year. We are not mega-rich, we had an income of about $30,000 a year at the time. Some kids were there on scholarships. Not a fancy school at all. Lots of parents and family members volunteering long hours to help keep costs down. Wonderful teachers, too, many of them there for 20+ years. Really solid Catholic principal.Here in Seattle catholic school costs 9,000 a year that makes it seem like catholic schools are only obtained by the mega rich. That doesn’t seem moral