K
khutcheson
Guest
I agree that in person communication is better–without facial expressions, tone of voice, body language, much is lost. Moreover, in my experience, in person communication is often more civil (although in my experience, this board is pretty good about staying civil, not perfect, but usually pretty good).It may be so that I don’t get it as I haven’t read most of this thread; but I do think that just by looking at your initial response that you did not do his words justice. Saying that there might be people who refrain from converting to Catholicism due to insecurity/cowardice is a perfectly reasonable statement, and I admit I am biased but I sensed no malice in his tone. This does bring up a major issue with online forums though… the vast majority of what is said would be far better done in person, though forums do indeed have their place.
Had you read more of this thread you might have seen that he apologized for his original post and I apologized for being so thin skinned. (That’s why I didn’t respond to your post–I see no profit in continuing a dispute that was already resolved between the parties).
However, one of the points I was trying to make is that this thread is about evangelization. I am suggesting that if you really think us Protestants are cowards, you are not likely to be effective at evangelization because that attitude will come through loud and clear when we communicate and people’s response to you is not likely to be positive, regardless of how well intentioned you might be.
BTW, I don’t see cowardice as being a likely cause for someone to reject Catholicism, but that’s just my opinion.