A
agapewolf
Guest
You are defining love incorrectly. Love is not a feeling. It is not romance.I am 40.
I was never sure i would have the patience for children. I guess I figured if i wanted to have children i would feel that way. The thought of having a life to take care of that was so fragile frightened me. I know through life that I have risen to the challenges, but that doesn’t necessarily help.
I cant explain why I don’t feel like everyone else. Sometimes i look at children with their families and wonder if what I feel is wrong. Maybe I will regret it down the road and all of a sudden feel the need to have children of my own. But I cant change that and I don’t want to FORCE myself to feel another way because people think it’s wrong or weird.
Bucket said: "Why not just live together and hook-up and do whatever you want? "
To me marriage is a way to show someone how much you love them and that you want to be with them and only them for the rest of your life. I know (now) thats not the catholic definition and if it is it’s such a small part it’s not enough.
How can something like love and the need to show someone that love by professing to be with them forever no matter what through marriage be wrong. To me it’s not wrong, but to the church it’s not the reason for it.
To the church I can show that person that love by just being with them forever but not through marriage and “till death do us part”?
P.
Love is the cross. It is a decision – an act of the will for the good of the other. The good of the other person is heaven, so when you love someone you do what you have to do to get them to heaven.
If you read EPH 5, you see that call means so far as to die for her in order to get her to heaven. It’s about sacrifice and service to the spouse.
Children bring us out of selfishness-- it enhances our ability to love, teaches us to love.