Catholic priest attacks church in uganda.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mikel12
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Mikel12

Guest
I write from Uganda and greet all of you in Jesus’ name. I wanted to get the views of my fellow Catholics from other parts of the world about a letter written by a famous Catholic priest here in Uganda, which has caused alot of panic and anxiety in the Church. Fr. Anthony Musaala is a charismatic priest that has become the symbol of the Charismatic movement in Uganda. Below is the link and part of the letter he wrote

sebaspace.wordpress.com/2013/03/16/father-musaala-blows-the-lid-off-priestly-sexual-abuse-in-uganda-africa/

THE FAILURE OF CELIBATE CHASTITY AMONG DIOCESAN PRIESTS.

It is an open secret that many catholic priests and some bishops, in Uganda and elsewhere, no longer live celibate chastity.

From the numerous cases on the ground one might be forgiven for saying that most diocesan priests either don’t believe in celibacy anymore, or if they do, have long since given up the struggle to be chaste.

In any case it still seems important for priests to vow even a woefully imperfect celibacy, if only for the sake of the hallowed ‘priestly image’.

The church however still maintains the fable that most catholic priests persevere in celibate chastity fairly well, which fiction begs belief.

ALL IS NOT WELL

All is definitely not well with what I call ‘administrative celibacy’, in the catholic church. It is a celibacy which is more forced than consented to, and its effects are anything but good.

I suggest that now more than at any other time, we must begin an open and frank dialogue about catholic priests becoming happily married men, rather than being miserable and single, either before or after ordination.

Although this may be quite a shock to many, but the alternative may be far worse. What do you think happens when lapses and scandals by priests, sisters,brothers and bishops continue unabated , whether hidden or not?

My forecast is that we will have a few more years of catholic self-deception; perhaps ten, telling ourselves and the world that everything is Ok, nothing serious. Then more scandals will surface.

As people become more enlightened (as in Europe) there will be a crisis of faith, perhaps a sudden collapse, with many leaving the church, either to join other churches (whose pastors may be no better, but who appear to be less hypocritical about it), or to become agnostics, especially the middle classes.

One must remember that there are other challenges facing the church, such as general weakening of faith, loss of sacramental life, low incomes, dull liturgies, and the challenges of the media. Many of the youth ( not the children) are already alienated from Catholicism and are easy prey to proselytizing groups.

FACING THE NAKED TRUTH

The number of catholic priests and bishops who are sexually active in Uganda is unknown, but almost everywhere unedifying stories of priests ‘sexploits’, are not hard to come by. These stories are told in counseling or as anecdotes,or by the media. They are told within the parishes and beyond. They are told at home in families, in taxis, in hair salons and in the markets.

What is talked about? Priests’ secret and not so secret liaisons with girls and women, coerced sex with house-maids, with students, with relatives; priests ‘wives’ set up in well established homes; priests involved with a parishioner’s wife; of priests romantically involved with religious Sisters; priests offering money for sex, and so on…

If you add to this, a fair number of priests’ and bishops’ children scattered around the nation, who are carefully hidden from view (and not so carefully!), not to mention children who are aborted at priests’ behest, we begin to get the true picture of human weakness, whose consequences are nothing less than catastrophic both for the priest and his partners, and which cannot be concealed by taking a vow of celibacy, or by retreats and more prayers.

LETS LEARN FROM EUROPE AND AMERICA

While in Europe and the States, the scandal of numerous paedophile priests, whose victims are rightly suing the catholic church is widely reported in the media, very little by contrast is heard about priests and bishops in Africa who continue sexually abusing female minors (or vulnerable women) with no legal action taken.

Obviously time has come for serious measures to be undertaken, similar to those in Europe and America. Apart from legal action in civil and ecclesiastical courts aginst offenders, strict ‘child protection’ codes and practices, must be enforced, by the state which for instance should prohibit young or vulnerable females from residing in parish houses, where some of the abuses occur.

THE SINS OF DECEPTION AND SILENCE

Thus the unnecessary and unpalatable deception about celibate priests, that they are chaste when they are not is clearly contradicted by what is on the ground. The deception is of course not tenable for much longer.

Surely we must first tell ourselves the truth as a church, that is to say, that celibacy has failed or is failing us, and then also tell the world which we have been deceiving the naked truth, before we are completely overtaken by events.

Unfortunately there is an ominous unhealthy conspiracy of silence about these matters among the Ugandan clergy and faithful alike, probably because priestly celibacy might be seen to be a hollow shell, which it mostly is nowadays.

The laity for all their good will, are also co-opted into this unwholesome silence, sometimes for lack of information, sometimes because they believe that they have some ‘moral’ duty to be loyal to an imperfect church. In truth their silence shores up the sins of priests and the destroys many lives.

The article continues and you can visit the link above.
 
Below is the response by the Archbishop of Kampala to the letter above.

Dear people of God,

“I deeply think of the immense suffering caused by the article produced in the media authored by Fr. Anthony Musaala, that seem to be casting a dark shadow of suspicion" over all priests.

Above all, the Church takes seriously the allegations in this article.

On behalf of the my fellow Catholic Bishops in Uganda I wish to assure the public that as leaders of the Catholic Church in Uganda; we are committed to the protection of the minors and rights of everyone. Investigations about these allegations are to begin immediately with of course cases that are proved.

It should however, be clear to everyone that the value of the choice of priestly celibacy according to the Catholic tradition still stands, and the need for solid human and Christian formation is underlined, both for seminarians and for those already ordained.

The Catholic Church’s Code of Canon Law states the stand of the Catholic Church on celibacy in Canon 277, which mandates clerical celibacy that: “Clerics are obliged to observe perfect and perpetual continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven and therefore are obliged to observe celibacy, which is a special gift of God, by which sacred ministers can adhere more easily to Christ with an undivided heart and can more freely dedicate themselves to the services of God and mankind.”

This Church law is embraced willingly as prescribed by Can.1037 which states that: “A candidate for the permanent diaconate who is not married, and likewise a candidate for the priesthood, is not to be admitted to the order of diaconate unless he has, in the prescribed rite, publically before God and the Church undertaken the obligation of celibacy, or unless he has taken perpetual vows in a religious institute”. This means therefore that no one is forced to embrace this discipline before or at ordination.

Everyone should once again remember that until Christ came along (Mt 19:12), and then Paul (1 Cor. 7:32-35), the only state of life known was marriage but when Christ came, He made it clear that some people would remain celibate (“eunuchs”) for the sake of the Kingdom of God (Mt 19:12).

St. Paul further recommended it for those who would be dedicated to serving God in this world (1 Cor. 7:7, 17, 32-35), for the salvation of souls and it is totally a freedom of choice as the above biblical quotations suggest.

If one fails to comply with this discipline, he does it on his own and not on behalf of the Church. Consequently personal failure in this regard is not an offence sanctioned by the Church. However we as Bishops deeply regret such failures and seek forgiveness from those who have been victims.

I indeed applaud all the many religious men and women who have remained faithful to this promise and there is nothing we can offer but our prayers for them.

It is very unfortunate that the author of the published document stands to call for suspension of this discipline through his proposed forum that has no Church legitimacy and yet the Church’s legislation and practice is clear on this point. None-the-less we are going to investigate on the allegations in the article with people concerned together with certainty of the author of this document.

As per now, after the acceptance of Fr. Musaala that he authored this document, the law prescribed by the Church in can. 1369 takes its course.

This law states that: “A person is to be punished with a just penalty, who, at a public event or assembly, or in a published writing, or by otherwise using the means of social communication, utters blasphemy, or gravely harms public morals, or rails at or excites hatred of or contempt for religion or the Church.”

This means therefore that Fr. Musaala because of the publication of his article in the public media which damages good morals of Catholic believers and further expresses a wrong teaching against the Catholic Church’s teaching and that this stirs up hatred and contempt against the Church, he incurs a Ferendae sententiae penalty as prescribed by Can.1314.

This means that Father Anthony Musaala is suspended from celebrating sacraments and sacramentals, from the powers of governance in accordance to the law of the Church Can.1335 and1336§1n.1, 2and3 as investigations are being carried on.

Once more I feel sorry of the inconveniences caused by this article and let us entrust the whole matter to our Lord the most chaste.

Yours Sincerely in Christ,

+Cyprian K. Lwanga

ARCHBISHOP OF KAMPALA
 
Priests have never been allowed to “get married.” Not in the 2000 year history of the Church. And the Church has always had unfaithful priests among its ranks. Begin the list with Judas Iscariot. The solution is not to change the rules, but to change the hearts of these errant priests.

However, some married men have been allowed to become priests, and still are. We have married priests. But, there is no reason for this. It would not solve any problems, and it would create new ones we don’t have. In fact, at no time during history, have we needed a celibate priesthood more than now! We need an example of sacrificing oneself for the Kingdom of God in this narcissistic culture in which we live. Also, note that if a married priest becomes a widow, he may not get remarried.
 
As people become more enlightened (as in Europe) there will be a crisis of faith, perhaps a sudden collapse, with many leaving the church, either to join other churches (whose pastors may be no better, but who appear to be less hypocritical about it), or to become agnostics, especially the middle classes.
Here’s a major flaw in the argument. People are not becoming more “enlightenned” but are descending further into darkness. The Church must cling to truth even if it results in less people in the pews!
 
**Priests have never been allowed to “get married.” ** Not in the 2000 year history of the Church. And the Church has always had unfaithful priests among its ranks. Begin the list with Judas Iscariot. The solution is not to change the rules, but to change the hearts of these errant priests.

However, some married men have been allowed to become priests, and still are. We have married priests. But, there is no reason for this. It would not solve any problems, and it would create new ones we don’t have. In fact, at no time during history, have we needed a celibate priesthood more than now! We need an example of sacrificing oneself for the Kingdom of God in this narcissistic culture in which we live. Also, note that if a married priest becomes a widow, he may not get remarried.
A person cannot state that categorically.

We don’t really now if priests have ever been allowed to get married.

We do know that for the last 1000 years they have not been allowed to get married.
 
… I wanted to get the views of my fellow Catholics from other parts of the world about a letter written by a famous Catholic priest here in Uganda, which has caused alot of panic and anxiety in the Church.****
  1. Father is entitled to his own personal opinion which may or may not be true.
  2. Father writes and publishes his opinion without thinking or knowing or caring about the consequences.
  3. Father’s Bishop publishes a beautifully crafted and appropriate response.
  4. Father’s Bishop imposes just penalties as prescribed by Canon Law.
  5. Father, hopefully, realizes the extreme error he made, apologizes to his Bishop and accepts any penance/direction from his Bishop.
This (3, 4, 5) is how the system is supposed to work. I think the faithful in Kampala have a good Bishop and need to pray for Father’s full return to reason.
 
A person cannot state that categorically.

We don’t really now if priests have ever been allowed to get married.

We do know that for the last 1000 years they have not been allowed to get married.
Actually, we do know. We can study the history of the Church. It’s not rocket science. We know, for a fact, that the Church has never sanctioned priests getting married. That’s not to say some rogue priest didn’t go out and get married. The Church has always had its Judas Isacriots, and I’m sure always will. Sounds like you have been afflicted with truth relativism from our broken educational system. I see this all the time. And, it’s not your fault, but you can fix it. There is, clearly, such a thing as objective truth.
 
Actually, we do know. We can study the history of the Church. It’s not rocket science. We know, for a fact, that the Church has never sanctioned priests getting married. That’s not to say some rogue priest didn’t go out and get married. The Church has always had its Judas Isacriots, and I’m sure always will. Sounds like you have been afflicted with truth relativism from our broken educational system. I see this all the time. And, it’s not your fault, but you can fix it. There is, clearly, such a thing as objective truth.
Gosh! I’m afflicted by relativism.:eek:

Or, perhaps we just cannot categorically say that the Church has NEVER allowed priests to get married.:cool:

As you say there is such a thing as objective truth - and objectively we can say in fact that many priests were married.

In the words of Pope Francis in an interview last year:
aleteia.org/en/religion/documents/in-2012-interview-cardinal-bergoglio-says-he-favors-keeping-celibacy-582001
For the moment, I am in favor of maintaining celibacy, with all its pros and cons, because we have ten centuries of good experiences rather than failures. What happens is that the scandals have an immediate impact. Tradition has weight and validity. **Catholic ministers chose celibacy little by little. Up until 1100, some chose it and some did not. **
P.S. I wish posters could argue to the point of the argument and not bring other poster’s backgrounds etc into it. It doesn’t advance the discussion at all. And perhaps their *ad-hominem *is just as inaccurate as their argument.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top