J
JReducation
Guest
That is not what I was trying to say. I was trying to say is that this is what is needed for salvation.I actually hope that he did. But if that is all that is entailed in veneration, then what need is there for research? Just get the testimony of his confessor that he was genuinely contrite and that’s the end of the matter.
And the test of this is mere evidence of genuine contrition? Again, seems like a very low standard to me.
Veneration is a different situation. What you’re stating in a decree of veneration is that the person’s life was one of heroic Christian virtue and worthy of imitation. The word heroic is key, This person went over and above what is minimally required, which is contrition for sin and restitution, either on earth or in Purgatory.
I don’t know the answer to that. I can only quote what the Vatican said. They will be available at a later date, becauese they are fragile and must be carefully copied and whatever else you do to documents.It’s not necesary that the Church do it, it’s only necessary that the scholars willing to take on this task are given access to the documents that Cromwell claims led him to call Pius “Hitler’s Pope.” Instead of slowing down the canoniztion process, why not speed up the document publication?
I’m cynical about people believing anything that show Pius XII in a good light. There are some who have judged and sentenced him. As far as they are concerned anything that the Church produces in his defense is a cover-up. Maybe that’s the reason that the Holy See does not engage in these contraversies. It’s like engaging in a political debate. No one really wins. You may sway a few people, but not everyone.As for your last point, you sound even more cynical than I am.
I say, let the Holy Spirit do his job. If he’s canonized, that’s his acquital. There is no way possible that he can be canonized, if he’s not a saint.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF