S
Struggling1
Guest
Anyway thank you for the response I’ll give this some thought. Have an excellent evening and sorry for being argumentative :/.
No. Yes, I fear hell. But I’m not going to let myself be paralyzed with fear over some chance that I’m not of the elect. Why should it? I understand what the Church teaches, and God has factored in my free will in the mystery of my own election or reprobation. So while a lot of it is with God, it’s also just as much on me.Fear of hell if you are potentially not one of the elect doesn’t frighten you to your very core? I’m pretty confident we should be terrified of hell?
God bless you Porthos11 and God bless every readers of the CAF.Elf01:![]()
Thomism is not double-predestination, but its theory makes it essentially equivalent to it. Because Thomism posits that God elects to heaven without consideration of foreseen merits, and then provides graces to secure the divine election, Thomists do not have a good explanation for reprobation. While they do not teach unconditioned positive reprobation as the Calvinists do (that God unconditionally reprobates to hell), they try to explain it as simply a non-election (unconditioned negative reprobation). But because outside of heaven and hell there is no third final state, this effectively equates Thomism with double-predestination. This is the main reason I cannot adopt it. I like its theory on predestination ante praevisa merita, but its take on reprobation is not acceptable to me.porthos11:![]()
I don’t see the difference between not electing somebody and predestining them to hell.God DOES actively elect the predestined
Molinism, on the other hand, posits election and reprobation after foreseen merits or demerits, while still affirming God’s positive action in both electing and reprobating men.
And just so that it’s clear: reprobation is also Catholic teaching. I know people like to cite Catechism 1037 ( God predestines no one to hell.) but one can hardly squeeze in predestination and reprobation in a one-liner.
.
If we study Predestination first we must know, on what ground the Church rejected that God saves everyone.
.
.
WHAT IS GOD’S REASON HE DOES NOT SAVE EVERYONE?
.
A TIPTOE THROUGH TULIP James Akin answer the question.
Quote: Thomas Aquinas wrote, "God wills to manifest his goodness in men: in respect to those whom he predestines, by means of his mercy, in sparing them; and in respect of others, whom he reprobates, by means of his justice, in punishing them.
This is the reason why God elects some and rejects others. End quote.
.
Quote from Augustune: Yet why he chooses some for glory and reprobates others has no reason except the divine will. ST I:23:5. End quote.
.
SUMMARY
On a selected people God shows His mercy by chosen them to heaven, and on the rest of the people to show His Justice, chosen them to eternal sufferings in the pains of hell for all eternity.
.
ON THE ABOVE GROUND the Church REJECTED that God saves everyone.
.
As we see above, the Church rejected God saves everyone on the ground that God is responsible for He throws people to hell.
.
Continue
God bless you Curious Cath and God bless every readers of the CAF.God bless you too, dear Latin, and God bless all reader of this forum, as well!
I have read what you wrote me, although I don’t see it posted anymore. My problem was about obedience. Obedience to whom and what? We have a bunch of institutions and personalities inserting themselves between the believer and God, and they all demand obedience to themselves when they talk about obedience to God.