Catholic vs. Sola Scriptura YouTube video driving me crazy!

  • Thread starter Thread starter dan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dan

Guest
youtube.com/watch?v=RJskrQq3dXM&feature=email

I enjoyed this video but one part is driving me nuts. At the 3:53 mark, the Catholic apologist asks his Protestant counterpart about his Bible’s table of contents. It *sounds (phonetically) *
like he’s asking him of his Bible table of contents are “theop nustance” but I can’t make out exactly what he’s saying.

Can anyone help a brutha out?

BTW, happy Feast of the Visitation!
**😃 **
http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/4972/mrtbiblicalscholarrj8.png
 
It *sounds (phonetically) *
like he’s asking him of his Bible table of contents are “theop nustance” but I can’t make out exactly what he’s saying.
I believe the phrase is “*Theo-nustas” *(I think in Greek it’s something like: Θεο-νυστας) meaning God-breathing (or breathed).
 
This whole argument is sick. We were all saved by grace, and our differences can be celebrated, not downgraded.
What became of spiritual liberty, and conscience? Who in his right mind thinks that he will be saved because his THEOLOGY is better than the next person? (Barring moral issues).
WHY do so many Christians think having the right to dictate what another thinks and believes is Christianity? When BOTH sides have a history soaked in blood and corruption?
I ACCEPT BOTH POINTS OF VIEW.
I don’t want to argue whether this is right or not.
The whole argument is sick. Christians are sick who go on like this, and they give Christianity a bad name.
Where is the joy, the peace, and the hope? Where is the love? I know the Vatican II documents-what is going on today among many Catholics (I am one) is disobedience to revealed truth (I refer to the Council documents).
I don’t CARE if you disagree. Go ahead, with my blessing. This whole thing is SICK!
 
I believe the phrase is “*Theo-nustas” *(I think in Greek it’s something like: Θεο-νυστας) meaning God-breathing (or breathed).
that’s what I found on Google, too, you beat me to it! 😃 You really do learn something every day.
 
What became of spiritual liberty, and conscience? Who in his right mind thinks that he will be saved because his THEOLOGY is better than the next person? (Barring moral issues).
Better theology begets better ability to solve moral problems which begets a better chance for salvation.
WHY do so many Christians think having the right to dictate what another thinks and believes is Christianity?
Why do you think you have the right to dictate what Christianity should be?
I ACCEPT BOTH POINTS OF VIEW.
Incoherent. Both positions cannot be right at the same time in the same way.
Where is the joy, the peace, and the hope? Where is the love?
Ironic that you should say that, given the angry, acerbic tone of your post.
 
Yup! Transliterated it is theopneustos, “theo” (God) and “pneustos” (breathed). It’s the word used to describe what Sacred Scripture is in 2 Timothy 3:16.

God bless you all!
 
Who in his right mind thinks that he will be saved because his THEOLOGY is better than the next person? (Barring moral issues).
WHY do so many Christians think having the right to dictate what another thinks and believes is Christianity? When BOTH sides have a history soaked in blood and corruption?
The spirit of debate can get the best of the participants and debaters can easily fail in regard to letting “your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person” (Col 4:6). We don’t have the right to dictate what another thinks and believes in the way that you mean; You are right! But we do have the obligation to speak the truth in love (Eph 4:15), “always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame” (1 Peter 3:15-16).

And doctrine is of great importance. Embracing false doctrine can kill the soul, and for this purpose [Jesus] had come into the world - “to bear witness to the truth” (John 18:37). “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed” (Gal 1:8-9). Even the beloved disciple who tells us that God is love asked, “[w]ho is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son” (1 John 2:22).

Being concerned about right doctrine and being able to communicate it graciously is a delicate balance and we must always run to “the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth” so that we may effectively “declare the mystery of Christ,” praying “that words may be given to me in opening my mouth boldly to proclaim the mystery of the gospel …] that I may declare it boldly, as I ought to speak” (John 1:14; Col 4:3; Eph 6:19-20).

May God bless you!

“Take heed to yourself and to the doctrine. Continue in them, for in doing this you will save both yourself and those who hear you” (1 Tim. 4:16).
 
This whole argument is sick. We were all saved by grace, and our differences can be celebrated, not downgraded.
Why celebrate error? I celebrate the glorious diversity of Christianity. But bad ideas are bad ideas. They should be respectfully and lovingly refuted, not celebrated.
What became of spiritual liberty, and conscience?
What became of these things in your post? If we are to celebrate views we think are wrong, what becomes of conscience? And if we don’t have the liberty to argue and debate, what kind of spiritual liberty do we have?
Who in his right mind thinks that he will be saved because his THEOLOGY is better than the next person?
I certainly don’t think this. But theology has consequences. We are to love God with our minds, which means among other things trying to get our theology straight.
(Barring moral issues).
Why make an exception for moral issues? Do you think that other kinds of error have no consequences?
WHY do so many Christians think having the right to dictate what another thinks and believes is Christianity?
How is disagreeing with someone “dictating”?

You are dictating right now, by your own standard. Your argument is self-refuting.

Edwin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top