Catholicism and Alcoholics Anonymous

  • Thread starter Thread starter djmauck
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Coptic Christian,

Wow!!! You certainly have a strong opinion on AA. I’m on my way to church this am, but will respond to your points later.

Right now, all I can say is without AA and Alanon, I don’t believe our family would have survived. And, literally, one of us probably would have be dead.

God Bless you.
 
I wasn’t sure what other topic to post this to, so forgive me if it’s misplaced.

I’ve been a member of AA for three years now and a Catholic for a little over two. As I grow more and more in my Catholic faith, I’m starting to have some misgivings about AA. Although I realized that 12-step programs are largely accepted by many Catholics as consistent with Church teaching, I have some major issues that I just can’t seem to get around. I was wondering what other people’s thoughts were.
  1. AA encourages people to seek a God of their understanding. We are to pray to a higher power, but get to choose what higher power to pray to. If people don’t like the idea of a higher power, they are told that a doorknob or a chair is acceptable (I’m not joking), or to use G.O.D. standing for “group of drunks” or “good orderly direction” as a higher power. The Big Book itself (the text for AA) says we accept people on the broad road to make things easy. However, this philosophy seems to say that ANY belief in God is equally valid, which explicitly contradicts the words of our Lord that He is the way, the truth, and the life, and that none come to the Father except for Him. Christ also tells us that the way is narrow and the path is hard. As a member of AA, I am supposed to reach out to newcomers and introduce them to AA philosophy, sometimes in the role of a personal “sponsor.” I do not feel comfortable telling people that any God is valid and exhorting them to form their own image of God or to even commit the idolatrous act of praying to an object or putting a group of people above them as a higher power.
  2. Although not explicitly stated, any reference to Christianity or Jesus, even in sharing one’s own experiences is discouraged in meetings because we don’t want to “scare off” newcomers who might be hostile to the idea of religion. How is this compatible with sharing the Gospel?
  3. AA’s sexual ethics are at odds with the Catholic Church. Again, people are encouraged to form their own sexual ethics, with the general idea that anything is OK as long as nobody is hurt.
  4. AA does encourage spiritual reflection, examinations of conscience, and confessing sins, but none of this is done with trained, experienced, Christian individuals - only to other AA members, who’s qualifications and trustworthiness is, in my mind, quite suspect.
I personally can find my own way in AA and sort of ignore all this and go ahead and practice my Catholic religion, but since such a big part of AA is spreading the program to newcomers, I just don’t feel comfortable teaching people what to me seems like outright heresy.

Any thoughts? (name removed by moderator)ut from other Catholic members of AA or those familiar with the program is especially welcome.
Its a support group period. No different than any other and probably more harmful than many. Correct one behavior then condone others. Theres without a doubt some very good groups which probably have been meeting for decades. However, by large there is what you are talking about.

The concept is constructed from loose church teaching yet the theory is there “somewhere”, without to imply church teaching and certainly not to teach it to any degree. So at each step you can make a connection to the church, but thats about it, since it multi-religious it can only scratch the surface.

In essense what you have is a support group where you do what “normal” people do daily. Learn to relate to your feelings so you don’t act off them in a misdirected inappropriate manner. Which obviously must have been the case to begin with or you wouldn’t sitting in the seat saying I’m Joe an Alcoholic" 🤷

For example one of the steps is making amends to others you hurt by your addiction etc. This is happening while males/females are using NA/AA for the local dating service to entertain their inadaquate sexual behaviors. Point which Copt makes and I too felt was very apparent and counter-productive. Look, if you have an issue, you should correct the one you have, not create others in the process. Or place another burden on yourself by being subjected to others behavior which they “deem” absolutely appropriate. So you accept this while you know its wrong? When you accept it does this not mean you condone it? Does this not make you part of it?

There is no absolution at a support group but on a feeling level by releasing the burden. Sin is still sin. Your not forgiven for a homicide you committed while drunk because you attended AA and cried and stated you were sorry to the group. Sure its helpful to talk about these skeletons in the closet with others, and its not hard for others to identify with the feelings. You do realize people without substance abuse issues do this daily without any thought of it, in other words they do this without a conscious effort. A practice they have become proficent at. Same process for those in AA/NA only they need from the on-set to make an intentional effort to do this.

I don’t believe in the lifelong “recovery” process either. I believe you will constantly need to be aware of your feelings/thoughts in particular for the first 18mth-2-year period while your chemical imbalance levels out. I believe you will understand just how dangerous temptation is once you place time and space between your errors. Should you not have learned the first time, you will continue the relapse/recovery process till either you do recover or you die. Basically how it works with substance abuse

As far as the issue itself, the statistics are all out here, all of us seen or know someone who suffers, and those who walked away from it. While family dynamics are without a doubt a help, I also don’t see why this would be limited to the AA model. This is what families have to do when a member has an issue. Its effects everyone, so everyone needs to be involved. Is there another way to get everyone on the same page? Problem here is most of the time family or loved ones don’t know what to do. Unfortunate by the time the issue is understood, often, to much water has passed under the bridge.

As a support group I see a value for the first 60-90 days perhaps. Or in addition to impatient or outpatient treatment for a limited time. Not in its overall long-term concept, but just being around others who are not using on a daily basis. I don’t think its the best senerio, but it is inexpensive and you can build from it, it is imperative to see it for what it it and use it to your benifit as opposed to being a part of the overall cult behavior which seems to set it own standards to various degrees.

If your involved in the CC, Family, close Friends, employment/carreer, postive social activities, these are all support groups which add to the well being and focus of your life when implimented correctly. Just as honestly talking here can be of help.

You just became part of a pattern with AA/NA which now became a crutch and you have reservations about putting it down. I hear you, and you should be talking about that fear since its very real to you. But it can and has been overcome, thus it can be. You managed to remain substance free for 3-years, thats an accomplishement. You can build on this in a positive direction with other support groups. And it probably would be a bad idea to drop in now and again till you have support structure in place to completely withdraw.

I would doubt you will be heading to a package store tonight. And if you did it wouldn’t be because you had a physical craving for Alcohol or whatever, it would be because some social issue is effecting you on a personal level and you are about to act of those feelings, or you’ll deal with them correctly. Which would be to postpone them and talk about whats going on with yourself.

Just as there is a process to become part of temptation/vice/habit so too there is a process to oppose and overcome this. Learning to identify this before hand is the path.

Remember this is only a “support group” you are talking about here. It can be replaced with another which in reality can be a better moral-ethical model.

Daily Prayer shouldn’t be underestimated either, assuming you are already following the CC.
 
Attending open meetings with a member of AA is not a good way to learn. Interviewing is a scientific process. I doubt that very many members submitted to interviews. I have been an AA member for 24 years and have attended several thousand meetings and I don’t know “so much”.

After attending 1000’s of meeting across the country and abroad, I have only **experienced **a handful where someone did anything like preaching. Perhaps your experience was unique to the groups you attended?

The term 13th step refers to a disdained practice that is considered against the program’s teaching. Men sponsoring women and vice-verse is also against the program teaching. It is nearly unheard of except in the case of homosexuals. I wonder where you attended meetings???

The “notion of anonymous” refers to knowing a member’s last name, workplace, or other personal facts. Anonymity is at each member’s own discretion. Anything that a member reveals about himself is known by the group. Gossip is discouraged in the AA literature. People gossip. AA members are people.

If a person fails to make it to the 12th step, he is drinking. People who are drinking are not teaching. Teaching in AA is sharing what is in the literature and personal experiences, strength, and hope.

There are groups for family members of alcoholics. Attendance is not required. Many times families are dysfunctional. The family members do not have a disease. They often need help too.

AA members are encouraged to call their sponsors and/or any member of the program. Newcomers are advised to get phone numbers of many members.

I have personally known 100s of people who could not control their drinking until they joined AA. I think the number of members is around 2 million. Still, as with any successful organization, there are detractors.
Mt,

There are two ways to gain knowledg Empiricism and Rationalism and they always but heads. You don’t have to have diabetes to understand Diabetes and the Alcohol/AA always invoke this notion. If your notion were true then every person in the health care field would have to be alcoholic to be effective.

Reality is reality. Find published data, and you will find none, showing that AA has better than a 10% success rate that in fact is the same as those that spontaneously stop drinking on their own.

You may want to read “12 step horror Stories”…yes someone wrote about this and “The diseasing of America” by Stanton Peele.

I know people that sware by colon cleansing, I know people that sware by Allovera…so what…show me some data.
 
Everyone’s experience is different. AA varies according to the culture of the community in which it exists. I have seen good AA and bad AA.

@ Coptic:
Do you deny the existence of placebo effect?
Do I deny the placebo effect? What does this have to do with AA.

Alcoholism is treated with real drugs that include

Topomax
Antabuse
and others

Explain what your notion of placebo effect is and how it relates to this discussion.
 
Coptic Christian,

Wow!!! You certainly have a strong opinion on AA. I’m on my way to church this am, but will respond to your points later.

Right now, all I can say is without AA and Alanon, I don’t believe our family would have survived. And, literally, one of us probably would have be dead.

God Bless you.
Mummsie,

Good for you. You do not know what would have happened had you gone to SMART recovery or done anything else. What worked for you worked for you however facts are facts.
 
Mt,

There are two ways to gain knowledg Empiricism and Rationalism and they always but heads. You don’t have to have diabetes to understand Diabetes and the Alcohol/AA always invoke this notion. If your notion were true then every person in the health care field would have to be alcoholic to be effective.

Reality is reality. Find published data, and you will find none, showing that AA has better than a 10% success rate that in fact is the same as those that spontaneously stop drinking on their own.

You may want to read “12 step horror Stories”…yes someone wrote about this and “The diseasing of America” by Stanton Peele.

I know people that sware by colon cleansing, I know people that sware by Allovera…so what…show me some data.
By sighting experiences, such as attending a small number of open AA meetings, one is using empirical data. Such a small and unique data set is likely to lead to false conclusions of the population. Using the diabetes example indicates that you are following the “alcoholism is a disease” model which you previously rejected. Attending a few AA meetings does not make one an authority on AA. The subject is AA and its compatibility with Catholicism. Read the title.

I will not derail the thread by debating the effectiveness of AA or other treatments.
 
By sighting experiences, such as attending a small number of open AA meetings, one is using empirical data. Such a small and unique data set is likely to lead to false conclusions of the population. Using the diabetes example indicates that you are following the “alcoholism is a disease” model which you previously rejected. Attending a few AA meetings does not make one an authority on AA. The subject is AA and its compatibility with Catholicism. Read the title.

I will not derail the thread by debating the effectiveness of AA or other treatments.
Mtn,

There are 670 viewers of this thread. I have no reason to debate the effectiveness.

The Thread is Catholicism and AA. I pointed out that the Church has issued a document called:

Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of Life found here…

vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/interelg/documents/rc_pc_interelg_doc_20030203_new-age_en.html

This document states that “addiction and recovery have taken the place of sin and salvation”. This is consistent with reality that alcoholism is not a disease.

AA has been declared to be a religion by the 7th and 9th circuit courts of appeals.

There is no published data that proves that AA has greater than 10% success rate.

Stanton Peele has written “Diseasing of America”

Alcoholism is not a disease and Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of life states accurately addiction/recovery have taken the place of sin and salvation. This is consistent with the fact that alcoholism is not a disease.

I responded in kind to those that do not like the facts. Diabetes is a disease. Alcoholism is not. Understanding a disease and studying a disease is how you learn to treat a disease. Studying and trying to understand something that is declared to be a disease allows you to reject that it is not a disease. There are posts on homosexuality as you know. It was once a disease and not it is not. The DSM is a diagnosis by committee…

So I have nothing to debate. Facts are facts and I suggest everyone read Jesus Christ the bearer of the Water of life and see how that relates to Catholicism and Alcoholics anonymous…this is something I came across in my research…

When I discovered that there were issues with AA and the Church I searced to see if the Church had anything to say on the issue and as always the Chruch has something to say.

If someone would like to find something else that the Church has to say in document as it relates to Alcoholics anonymous contrary to Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of life I am all ears…

Lets stop debating facts.
 
By sighting experiences, such as attending a small number of open AA meetings, one is using empirical data. Such a small and unique data set is likely to lead to false conclusions of the population. Using the diabetes example indicates that you are following the “alcoholism is a disease” model which you previously rejected. Attending a few AA meetings does not make one an authority on AA. The subject is AA and its compatibility with Catholicism. Read the title.

I will not derail the thread by debating the effectiveness of AA or other treatments.
Mountain,

Here is a review of Jesus Christ the bearer of the Water of Life from an Orthodox perspective. Here they mention another resource that I found relevant…

jacwell.org/Fall_2003/Jesus_Christ_the_Bearer_of_Life.htm
“Christians need not, indeed, must not wait for an invitation to bring the message of the Good News of Jesus Christ to those who are looking for the answers to their questions, for spiritual food that satisfies, for living water” (6.2).
As an example, see the book entitled: The Odyssey of a New Religion: The Holy Order of MANS from New Age to Orthodoxy by Philip Charles Lucas, associate professor of religious studies at Stetson University in DeLand , Florida (Indiana University Press; (April 1995), ISBN: 0253336120).”
The key is not in emphasizing the inadequacy of other approaches, but instead to revisit the sources of our own faith, to offer “a good sound presentation of the Christian message.” We may need to recover the symbolism and artistic traditions of the Christian culture. In dialogue with people attracted to the new age, Christians must appeal to what touches the emotions and symbolic language.
We must begin with the Scriptures, the report says, but “most of all, coming to meet the Lord Jesus in prayer and in the sacraments, which are precisely the moments when our ordinary life is hallowed, is the surest way of making sense of the whole Christian message”
In the context of this discussion Catholicism and AA, it is important that anyone doing whatever they do that they should stand firm and invoke the Christian message of Jesus Christ as savior and take notice that sin can be met with salvation.🙂
 
Do I deny the placebo effect? What does this have to do with AA.

Alcoholism is treated with real drugs that include

Topomax
Antabuse
and others

Explain what your notion of placebo effect is and how it relates to this discussion.
If one has faith that a remedy will work, it will tend to work. :rolleyes: DUH!!

I totally agree that meds will help-- particularly antidepressents and low dosage major tranq for anxiety-- both emotionally-based excuses for drinking. Antabuse is a jail, not addressing the underlying reasons for alcohol abuse. Once a person quits drinking, they can take a look at some of their maladaptive reactions, which is what the program urges. Social relationships in a non-drinking environment also meets some of their needs. Learning to do what normal people take for granted.

Again, I think I stayed in long beyond what I needed, because I couldn’t address some of my cultural/spiritual issues there. I was stuck, not knowing what was behind some of my emotional issues.

Recovery is multi-faceted, not just meds or treatment or AA/NA.
 
Jerusha;9418325**:
If one has faith that a remedy will work, it will tend to work. :rolleyes: DUH!!
I totally agree that meds will help-- particularly antidepressents and low dosage major tranq for anxiety-- both emotionally-based excuses for drinking. Antabuse is a jail, not addressing the underlying reasons for alcohol abuse. Once a person quits drinking, they can take a look at some of their maladaptive reactions, which is what the program urges. Social relationships in a non-drinking environment also meets some of their needs. Learning to do what normal people take for granted.

Again, I think I stayed in long beyond what I needed, because I couldn’t address some of my cultural/spiritual issues there. I was stuck, not knowing what was behind some of my emotional issues.

Recovery is multi-faceted, not just meds or treatment or AA/NA.

Jer,

In the context of AA, there is no placebo effect, insofar as there is no sugar pill offered and that is the placebo effect. I give one person real stuff and the other person a sugar pill and tell them that both are the same thing. Your understanding of Placebo does not make sense.

Are you saying going to AA is a placebo? Let me understand being sent to rehab for 90 days where everyday you attend an AA meeting, everyday you sit in a counseling session for 3 hours, everyday you study the steps, everyday you do group sessions…for what to be inculcated that Alcoholism is a disease, that the only solution is AA…and if you do not accept or question this then “you are in denial”…Are you suggesting that Placebo is at work here?

Now you may be on to something insofar as books like Psychocybernetics point out that imagined reality is reality and that is hypnosis. To be conned into believing that something is really going to help and believing it is really going to help…then it may have a chance of helping because you have been conned into believing it. Reality and imagined reality cause the same actions. This is not the placebo effect. This is hypnosis.

If you ever read the Big Book…the reason an alcoholic drinks…is because they like the effects…that is the reason…I drink because it is monday, St. Patricks, mother’s day…birthday…nope just because they like the effects.

In the context of this thread…Duh is disrespectful and not in line with the proper understanding of Placebo. You appear to lack knowedge of the Big Book and concerning Recovery…that is nothing more than 12 step parlance and in the context of the OHCAC and AA…

Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of life says that addiction/recovery is morally neutral and with that I am going with sin and salvation…to Jesus Christ the bearer of the Water of Life.
 
Duh is disrespectful and not in line with the proper understanding of Placebo.
I’m sorry, my irritation was showing. Placebo can work temporarily, until other remedies take hold, particularly if it is hyped (bad pun)

I don’t stick solely with the big Book, since I also have qualifications in psychology. Once the individual realizes that alcohol is a cause for sin, for them, it becomes a sin to drink. Unfortunately, the rationalizations/cravings/suicidal pathways can become so deeply burned into the individual’s thought patterns, that none of those strategies alone will work.

A person has to WANT to quit-- no amount of court ordered treatment, AA, or even meds is going to do anything until the individual realizes that it is a sin for him-- although not necessarily a sin for others. Until the individual reaches that point, it must be treated medically and legally with consequences. Again, the perception of judgmental attitudes can destroy any relationship.
 
I wasn’t sure what other topic to post this to, so forgive me if it’s misplaced.

I’ve been a member of AA for three years now and a Catholic for a little over two. As I grow more and more in my Catholic faith, I’m starting to have some misgivings about AA. Although I realized that 12-step programs are largely accepted by many Catholics as consistent with Church teaching, I have some major issues that I just can’t seem to get around. I was wondering what other people’s thoughts were.
  1. AA encourages people to seek a God of their understanding. We are to pray to a higher power, but get to choose what higher power to pray to. If people don’t like the idea of a higher power, they are told that a doorknob or a chair is acceptable (I’m not joking), or to use G.O.D. standing for “group of drunks” or “good orderly direction” as a higher power. The Big Book itself (the text for AA) says we accept people on the broad road to make things easy. However, this philosophy seems to say that ANY belief in God is equally valid, which explicitly contradicts the words of our Lord that He is the way, the truth, and the life, and that none come to the Father except for Him. Christ also tells us that the way is narrow and the path is hard. As a member of AA, I am supposed to reach out to newcomers and introduce them to AA philosophy, sometimes in the role of a personal “sponsor.” I do not feel comfortable telling people that any God is valid and exhorting them to form their own image of God or to even commit the idolatrous act of praying to an object or putting a group of people above them as a higher power.
  2. Although not explicitly stated, any reference to Christianity or Jesus, even in sharing one’s own experiences is discouraged in meetings because we don’t want to “scare off” newcomers who might be hostile to the idea of religion. How is this compatible with sharing the Gospel?
  3. AA’s sexual ethics are at odds with the Catholic Church. Again, people are encouraged to form their own sexual ethics, with the general idea that anything is OK as long as nobody is hurt.
  4. AA does encourage spiritual reflection, examinations of conscience, and confessing sins, but none of this is done with trained, experienced, Christian individuals - only to other AA members, who’s qualifications and trustworthiness is, in my mind, quite suspect.
I personally can find my own way in AA and sort of ignore all this and go ahead and practice my Catholic religion, but since such a big part of AA is spreading the program to newcomers, I just don’t feel comfortable teaching people what to me seems like outright heresy.

Any thoughts? (name removed by moderator)ut from other Catholic members of AA or those familiar with the program is especially welcome.
Your job in AA is to find a sponsor and work the steps. It is not to offer unsolicited advice to others. I don’t understand how you would find yourself teaching heresy to others.
 
I’m sorry, my irritation was showing. Placebo can work temporarily, until other remedies take hold, particularly if it is hyped (bad pun)

I don’t stick solely with the big Book, since I also have qualifications in psychology. Once the individual realizes that alcohol is a cause for sin, for them, it becomes a sin to drink. Unfortunately, the rationalizations/cravings/suicidal pathways can become so deeply burned into the individual’s thought patterns, that none of those strategies alone will work.

A person has to WANT to quit-- no amount of court ordered treatment, AA, or even meds is going to do anything until the individual realizes that it is a sin for him-- although not necessarily a sin for others. Until the individual reaches that point, it must be treated medically and legally with consequences. Again, the perception of judgmental attitudes can destroy any relationship.
Jerusha,

In the context of the OHCAC how many times do you need to confess your sins? How many times do you need to forgive?

The OHCAC is so great. You go to confession, confess your sins, say your penance and then you will never do that sin again…are you sure about that.

Sin is sin. Sometimes in any circumstance until we recognize that sin is sin then no jail,no court can stop a serial killer until they realize it is sin…

what is new. All sinners must realize that they sin to sin no more.
 
This then gets into my issues as an individual. Those cultural issues, and contact with a subculture that is very-- selective-- in its definition of forgiveness. Thank you. I will have to shelve it for a while, since I am busy on something else.
 
My priest encourages my attendance to NA.
Without NA, I would still be using drugs and would still be a very sick person. It was my last ditch effort to survive…
And, by the grace of God, I survived. God led me to the program…and soon thereafter, I converted to Catholicism.
One thing to keep in mind in all this, is that the primary purpose of NA was not to convert me to a certain religion, but it was to help me get sober. That is one fundamental piece of my life that needs to be kept in order, for me to be of any good use to God. I leave the rest of my formation to the Church.
Keep in mind, everyone, that these programs save lives. Since being a part of NA, I have seen many leave the program, only to overdose and die.
If you have issues or conflicts with sharing the message of recovery versus the Church, talk to your priest (then talk to your sponsor) 👍
 
My priest encourages my attendance to NA.
Without NA, I would still be using drugs and would still be a very sick person. It was my last ditch effort to survive…
And, by the grace of God, I survived. God led me to the program…and soon thereafter, I converted to Catholicism.
One thing to keep in mind in all this, is that the primary purpose of NA was not to convert me to a certain religion, but it was to help me get sober. That is one fundamental piece of my life that needs to be kept in order, for me to be of any good use to God. I leave the rest of my formation to the Church.
Keep in mind, everyone, that these programs save lives. Since being a part of NA, I have seen many leave the program, only to overdose and die.
If you have issues or conflicts with sharing the message of recovery versus the Church, talk to your priest (then talk to your sponsor) 👍
Ghost,

Pleased to see you have survived, have stayed in touch with your priest and found the OHCAC. Many die with or without a program. Many use with and without the program. Many come and many go…many come to Church and do the same thing.
 
Ghost,

Pleased to see you have survived, have stayed in touch with your priest and found the OHCAC. Many die with or without a program. Many use with and without the program. Many come and many go…many come to Church and do the same thing.
Its also important to note, that many die only because they STOP working the program.
Peace.
 
Its also important to note, that many die only because they STOP working the program.
Peace.
Ghost,

Many die while working the program. Many die when they stop working the program. Many die.
 
i used to belong to al-anon because i grew up with an alcoholic father and a mother who was not far behind him. so i know about the 12 steps and i also read the book that they use in AA. my father never knew sobriety, unfortunatey, before he died.
i never could stick with al-anon. i found there were some very unhealthy personalities there and i think there probaby are some good al-anon groups out there, but there are also some bad ones. i attended some AA meetings a few times and having a support group is so important, but i just don’t know if i agree with the 12 step program. especially the part about a higher power, without being specific.
i attended a divorce care group and i liked it, but would have preferred one that was made specifically for Catholics.
in the 12 step program, just saying you need to believe in a higher power is too broad for me.
to each his own, i guess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top