Mtn,
…
The Thread is Catholicism and AA. I pointed out that the Church has issued a document called:
Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of Life found here…
vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/interelg/documents/rc_pc_interelg_doc_20030203_new-age_en.html
This document states that “addiction and recovery have taken the place of sin and salvation”. This is consistent with reality that alcoholism is not a disease.
…
Alcoholism is not a disease and Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of life states accurately addiction/recovery have taken the place of sin and salvation. This is consistent with the fact that alcoholism is not a disease.
…
So I have nothing to debate. Facts are facts and I suggest everyone read Jesus Christ the bearer of the Water of life and see how that relates to Catholicism and Alcoholics anonymous…this is something I came across in my research…
When I discovered that there were issues with AA and the Church I searced to see if the Church had anything to say on the issue and as always the Chruch has something to say.
If someone would like to find something else that the Church has to say in document as it relates to Alcoholics anonymous contrary to Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of life I am all ears…
Lets stop debating facts.
You have found a valid resource, and deserve to have these points answered. My response follows.
Firstly, there should be a strong presumption against finding that the Church has rejected Alcoholics Anonymous, because AA is well known in Catholic circles, has been known for 70 years, and many priests, religious and laity are active members, and encourage Catholic alcoholics to follow the program, and still do so. For example, Fr Vincent Serpa, answers the question
Can a Catholic go to Alcoholics Anonymous? with a firm yes. If one finds a document that
appears to reject AA then it needs to be looked at closely to see exactly what it is saying.
Now, let’s look at the document.
- It is about the New Age phenomenon. Twelve-step programs get only two passing mentions in it. No one could suggest that twelve-step programs have much to do with the New Age. The only relevance of the document then is where some aspects of New Age overlap with some aspects of twelve-stepping. It should be noted that the document itself says that many aspects of New Age also overlap with Catholicism. It’s not intrinsically wrong to overlap with New Age.
From the introduction:
The present study is concerned with the complex phenomenon of “New Age” which is influencing many aspects of contemporary culture.
Also, please note that it is largely informational, rather than doctrinal. It is not a syllabus of errors.
- Again from the introduction:
The study is a **provisional report. **
Note: emphasis in the original.
So, it should not be read as a formal statement from the Church on anything. It is a provisional report only. As the two references to twelve-steps and addictions are only minor details, one should definitely not read them as formal statements from the church. They could well be removed from a subsequent report.
- The first passage about twelve step programs is:
Advertising connected with New Age covers a wide range of practices as acupuncture, biofeedback, chiropractic, kinesiology, homeopathy, iridology, massage and various kinds of “bodywork” (such as orgonomy, Feldenkrais, reflexology, Rolfing, polarity massage, therapeutic touch etc.), meditation and visualisation, nutritional therapies, psychic healing, various kinds of herbal medicine, healing by crystals, metals, music or colours, reincarnation therapies and, finally, twelve-step programmes and self-help groups.(25) The source of healing is said to be within ourselves, something we reach when we are in touch with our inner energy or cosmic energy.
.
This reads as a comprehensive “background information” list only. It is not saying that every item here is contrary to Catholicism. For instance, Catholics can have massages, see a chiropractor, attend “self help” groups, etc. However, I would say that it is just plain wrong to include twelve-step programs in this list. “The source of healing is said to be within ourselves” is in contrast to “Came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity”. In addition, the strong emphasis in AA on admitting wrongs and making amends is distinctly un-New Age. Some AA’ers are New Ageers, and most aren’t.
- The second relevant passage is:
New Age imports Eastern religious practices piecemeal and re- interprets them to suit Westerners; this involves a rejection of the language of sin and salvation, replacing it with the morally neutral language of addiction and recovery.
Again, 12-step programs are not New Age, they are not “Eastern religious practices”, and they are not “morally neutral”. Whatever is intended by this passage it should not be read as a rejection of 12-step programs.
I cannot provide you with a single authoritative reference from the highest sources saying that AA is acceptable for Catholics, however, as I said previously, the widespread acceptance, recommendation and use of them by Catholics, including the clergy, would indicate against reading two passing references from a **provisional **document on
another subject, as condemnation.