No but it does mean He forgave them. He even came back and stayed in their company for a time.
Not all killing is wrong, some can be excused.
Many of those ‘‘punks’’ were likely born in America and have as much right to live there as you do.
So you’d be happy to leave the millions of legal Latin American immigrants and the many many American citizens with Latin ancestry who are not criminals or gang members? OK fair enough. Also, what exactly is it that I hate?
Which race is that? I’ve told you numerous times what happens in my neighbourhood and YOU went ahead and searched for BBC news reports about the increase in violent crime in Britain. Yet you still choose to dismiss it because you’re only worried about your own imaginary problems. What more do you want a photograph of me revealing my two stab wounds while sitting at the dinner table with my multi cultural group of friends? Would that give me enough street cred on this internet forum so that I could debate you?
Only when she impedes you from carrying out your hateful desires. The Church is a problem for those who hate without regret I agree.
I want you to find me just one veteran who felt good about killing. If it is excused, why do they still have nightmares 50 years after the events occurred.
Being born in America does not make anyone an American.
These people can do whatever they want on their side of the border.
Your speaking from YOUR point of view, you do not speak for all of UK.
I wanted to post photos of what your “harmless, hard working, religious holy faithful Catholics” were doing to my house but some people called presenting that evidence as racist.
First of all, why did you get stabbed by your multi cultural group? You’re making my case for me!!
The Church creates many of its own problems by keeping silent and supporting the wrong people. No one can deny that.
Well, that was his 4th identity on here. What does that tell ya?
He can reinvent himself better than U2 and Madonna?Well, that was his 4th identity on here. What does that tell ya?
Is it only four? I’m sure there was a fifth. Spiker or something?Well, that was his 4th identity on here. What does that tell ya?
I don’t know, brother. Could have been. It was hard keeping up with them
It’s not hard to tell who he is - LOL. So, if he turns up again, we’ll know.I love this suggestion and given that so many illegals are in construction they clearly have the skills to do it.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ILLEGAL PERSON.
Your word games illustrate one aspect of the struggle that too often goes unremarked: the battle over nomenclature. Too few people really understand what the debate is about; it is after all a complicated subject and the side that can claim the words that control the connotations often win the argument without having to provide any rationale, simply by sounding more reasonable. Take the opposition to “illegal” and the preference for “undocumented.” The latter sounds much more benign, like forgetting where you left your passport or voter ID card. The former sounds so much more … well, descriptive of the actual situation.
A person cannot be illegal, an act can be illegal.
They can’t. Criminal would be more accurate, but that also is harsher, as it lumps them together with more violent criminals.
This illustrates my point. If the proper term is criminal what is the objection to using it? It is precisely that it presents illegals in such a way as to minimize sympathy for their situation when the objective of many is to maximize the sympathy. This is the attractiveness of the benign phrase “undocumented people.”
Except he did it in such a shorter amount of time.