Catholicism and Nationalism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daz
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Daz

Guest
Is it possible to reconcile nationalism to catholicism? I am not talking about the skin headed jack booted variety, I mean the political movement of asserting national interests and independence. I have always been drawn to civic nationalism, communitarianism and localism, but I struggle to see how this fits with the internationalist outlook of the Roman Catholic Church. It is important to me to support English culture and heritage, and to support local economies, are these issues that separate me from mainstream catholicism?
 
Why would the two necessarily be in conflict? I’m not sure it would necessarily always lead to something that a Catholic could support without reservations, but I don’t see anything that would contravene Catholic doctrine in simply loving your country and being willing to fight for it when necessary and appropriate. It’s certainly a potentially volatile idea, but then so is nationalism + anything (religion, ethnicity, language, etc). I would say that, as with all intersections of faith and the secular world, it is best to let your faith guide you rather than be subsumed to a presumed “national interest”, no matter how attractive that idea is to you. This Earth is a temporary home, and God made all the people on it, but none of the borders!

“We were attacked as Christians, but we fought as Lebanese” - Bachir Gemayel (leader of the Lebanese Forces, a coalition of mainly Maronite militias active during the civil war)
 
We can be loyal citizens to the extent it does not conflict with our Christian values. For Jesus is to be central to everything in our lives. He is more important than anyone and anything. When we give greater importance to the worldly values than to God, then we are rejecting God. We are called to holiness, and we are called to help our nation to be holy.

Pope Leo XIII warned against Americanism:

ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/L13TESTE.HTM
The underlying principle of these new opinions is that, in order to more easily attract those who differ from her, the Church should shape her teachings more in accord with the spirit of the age and relax some of her ancient severity and make some concessions to new opinions. Many think that these concessions should be made not only in regard to ways of living, but even in regard to doctrines which belong to the deposit of the faith. They contend that it would be opportune, in order to gain those who differ from us, to omit certain points of her teaching which are of lesser importance, and to tone down the meaning which the Church has always attached to them. It does not need many words, beloved son, to prove the falsity of these ideas if the nature and origin of the doctrine which the Church proposes are recalled to mind. The Vatican Council says concerning this point: “For the doctrine of faith which God has revealed has not been proposed, like a philosophical invention to be perfected by human ingenuity, but has been delivered as a divine deposit to the Spouse of Christ to be faithfully kept and infallibly declared. Hence that meaning of the sacred dogmas is perpetually to be retained which our Holy Mother, the Church, has once declared, nor is that meaning ever to be departed from under the pretense or pretext of a deeper comprehension of them.” —Constitutio de Fide Catholica, Chapter iv.
They are adapted to all times and all nations, as is clearly seen from the words of our Lord to His apostles: “Going, therefore, teach all nations; teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you, and behold, I am with you all days, even to the end of the world.”—Matt. xxviii, 19.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top