Catholics and firearms

  • Thread starter Thread starter codefro
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
… In addition, the right to gun ownership is enshrined in out Constitution precisely because of a fear of the government…
I think you have hit on something here. There appear to be two types of people in this country: those who are for smaller government, and those who are for bigger government. It seems that most debates get down to which you prefer. Pro-gun controllers are for bigger government: you can’t have more control without more government. They obviously don’t fear government and, as a result, can’t see why people “need” guns.
 
Note to jwinch2

Rather than posting these long “cut and paste” postings, why not just post a link to the article.

Peace
James
 
I am a Catholic. I love my Faith. I like hunting and fishing and owning shotguns and rifles and cowboy style revolvers (I havent actually had the chance to do any of those things yet, but I want to so bad!!)

I would only own a gun to hunt, shoot skeet and trap. Perhaps, in the most extraordinary case, where my fists alone couldnt settle him down, I would use a gun for self defense, preferably hitting him in an area that will subdue, not kill him. Just War doctrine applies here, and I think it prudent to own guns, responsibly and for morally and socially legal uses. Our LORD entrusted nature to us, to subdue it, like a Master Artists and His brushes. (Maybe, Im just too much of a hick! :D)
 
Note to jwinch2

Rather than posting these long “cut and paste” postings, why not just post a link to the article.

Peace
James
Because when the website changes or goes down, the link stops working. That is what happened in the previous thread we had on this exact same topic, about 6 months ago.
 
Because when the website changes or goes down, the link stops working. That is what happened in the previous thread we had on this exact same topic, about 6 months ago.
Fair enough…But to be honest…Most threads here seem to die and get buried and new threads started on the same topics…Which is OK but then it requires that you look up this same data over again at which time you can post and “up to date” link…

The only reason I bring it up is because making such long postings tends to use up space on the servers unnecessarily thus increasing the costs for CAF.

It is, in fact, a violation of the rules to do this - From rules on content:

  1. *]Do not paste entire articles from web sites into a post. If you wish to reference an article on the web, link to its web address, instead.

    Just so you know in the future…

    Peace
    James
 
Fair enough…But to be honest…Most threads here seem to die and get buried and new threads started on the same topics…Which is OK but then it requires that you look up this same data over again at which time you can post and “up to date” link…

The only reason I bring it up is because making such long postings tends to use up space on the servers unnecessarily thus increasing the costs for CAF.

It is, in fact, a violation of the rules to do this - From rules on content:

  1. *]Do not paste entire articles from web sites into a post. If you wish to reference an article on the web, link to its web address, instead.

    Just so you know in the future…

    Peace
    James

  1. If that wasn’t the third time I had been through this with the exact same articles, I probably wouldn’t have done it. I would have just linked to the previous thread and called it a day.
 
Some guns are fine, but I support reinstating the assault rifle ban. Ak-47s are for fighting the Taliban, not your neighbor.
What do you mean by “AK-47” and “assault rifle”? It is currently illegal to possess a fully-automatic AK-47 unless you have the money for the permit. Semi-auto versions are no different from other makes of semi-auto rifles that do not require a permit, except they just look evil.
 
Some guns are fine, but I support reinstating the assault rifle ban. Ak-47s are for fighting the Taliban, not your neighbor.
Which gun is more deadly, this or an AK-47?



Oh, and for what it’s worth the “AR” in AR-15 does not and never did stand for “Assault Rifle”. It stands for ArmaLite Rifle as in the company ArmaLite.
 
The so called “entertainment industry” have influenced more people to violent mindset that all the firearms ever made. I say that knowing that I cannot “prove” it…but I know it just the same and so do you all. And which of our politicians are scrambling to control this glorification of murder , sex and mayhem? Who will even publically make the connection? Hollywood was forced to exclude smoking in scenes because it encourages the young to mimic the addiction but they will and do deny any connection between film and the horrific violence among our young. Blaming firearms is the easy way out for people who are unable to connect dots.🤷
 
The so called “entertainment industry” have influenced more people to violent mindset that all the firearms ever made. I say that knowing that I cannot “prove” it…but I know it just the same and so do you all. And which of our politicians are scrambling to control this glorification of murder , sex and mayhem? Who will even publically make the connection? Hollywood was forced to exclude smoking in scenes because it encourages the young to mimic the addiction but they will and do deny any connection between film and the horrific violence among our young. Blaming firearms is the easy way out for people who are unable to connect dots.🤷
All the firearms ever made??? You know that 625,000 died in the US Civil War, right? They were not killed by Hollywood my friend.

What bother’s me is that many gun owners seem anxious to be given the opportunity to defend themselves with deadly force. Some seem to salivate at the thought of using their weapon in anger and get all excited when they say that they will defend themselves.

There really is a “Make my day” attitude among some gun owners out there, exemplified by the “Insured by Smith and Wesson” and “Keep honking while I reload” bumper stickers.

It’s these who scare me the most, the one’s who do not think of their guns as a last resort but as a first line of defense - shoot first and ask questions later.

-Tim-
 
The so called “entertainment industry” have influenced more people to violent mindset that all the firearms ever made. I say that knowing that I cannot “prove” it…but I know it just the same and so do you all. And which of our politicians are scrambling to control this glorification of murder , sex and mayhem? Who will even publically make the connection? Hollywood was forced to exclude smoking in scenes because it encourages the young to mimic the addiction but they will and do deny any connection between film and the horrific violence among our young. Blaming firearms is the easy way out for people who are unable to connect dots.🤷
I think the “Victim Industrial Complex” mentality has a lot to do with it as well. I’m sure the perpetrators of these shooting feel they are victims of some sort.
 
All the firearms ever made??? You know that 625,000 died in the US Civil War, right? They were not killed by Hollywood my friend.
Good point…but even in this it was not the firearms that influenced these people to violence…there was much violence before the introduction of gunpowder weapons. So when pismopal said…"* The so called “entertainment industry” have influenced more people to violent mindset that all the firearms ever made.*" it is probably more accurate to point out that this is a comparison of apples and oranges…
At the time running up to the civil war there were other things (abolitionists, states rights, newspaper columnists etc) who were doing the “influencing” - not the firearms…
What bother’s me is that many gun owners seem anxious to be given the opportunity to defend themselves with deadly force. Some seem to salivate at the thought of using their weapon in anger and get all excited when they say that they will defend themselves.
There is that element…and it can seem perhaps larger than it is since those who are not anxious (but still own a gun for that purpose) will not “salivate at the thought” or be vocal about it…
There really is a “Make my day” attitude among some gun owners out there, exemplified by the “Insured by Smith and Wesson” and “Keep honking while I reload” bumper stickers.
While I am not bothered by the “Insured by Smith and Wesson” bumper stickers…I agree about the other. Just as I am bothered by a bumper sticker saying “My kid beat up your honor student”. In both cases they show a poor attitude on the part of the owner…
It’s these who scare me the most, the one’s who do not think of their guns as a last resort but as a first line of defense - shoot first and ask questions later.
And this is why I fully support the idea of proper training - mandatory training for those wishing to own a gun - especially a handgun.
Such training would be perfectly legitimate under the Constitution as it would relate to maintaining a “Well trained militia”.

Peace
James
 
What bother’s me is that many gun owners seem anxious to be given the opportunity to defend themselves with deadly force. Some seem to salivate at the thought of using their weapon in anger and get all excited when they say that they will defend themselves.

There really is a “Make my day” attitude among some gun owners out there, exemplified by the “Insured by Smith and Wesson” and “Keep honking while I reload” bumper stickers.

It’s these who scare me the most, the one’s who do not think of their guns as a last resort but as a first line of defense - shoot first and ask questions later.

-Tim-
Very few people actually feel that way and the national data of gun crime, shootings, and those who carry (either concealed or open) legally. The number of people who are legally carrying guns on a regular basis who use them in ways that are determined to be illegal is infinitesimal. Painting them with that brush is akin to labeling all people who claim to be Christian as they same as the people from Westboro Baptist Church or the Baptist Church in Mississippi who wouldn’t let a black couple get married there. Obviously the overwhelming majority of Christians do not feel that way and neither do the overwhelming majority of gun owners look forward to ever using deadly force. People often get strident about it because they often feel marginalized and attacked for believe the way that they do. If people on the left stop trying to curtail the rights of US Citizens to carry legally and own guns, I firmly believe you will see very few of the signs or bumper stickers you have described.

Most people, such as myself, who are very pro self-defense rights, view firearms as an absolute last resort. For example when we lived on the border of a very bad neighborhood in the DC Metro, we spent money to upgrade our locks and our windows, had our phone line buried so that it couldn’t be cut easily, and had a good security system installed with 24 hour monitoring. I view owning a gun and being trained with it the same way that I view having a fire extinguisher in the house or knowing CPR and First Aid.

However, I have personally been strident about my right to bear arms on more than one occasion just as I have been lately with my first amendment rights under attack by the HHS mandate, or if my right to assemble peaceably, speak freely, etc. were under attack.

Stop trying to curtail my rights, and I will stop getting defensive about them. Pretty simple equation.
 
All the firearms ever made??? You know that 625,000 died in the US Civil War, right? They were not killed by Hollywood my friend.

What bother’s me is that many gun owners seem anxious to be given the opportunity to defend themselves with deadly force. Some seem to salivate at the thought of using their weapon in anger and get all excited when they say that they will defend themselves.

There really is a “Make my day” attitude among some gun owners out there, exemplified by the “Insured by Smith and Wesson” and “Keep honking while I reload” bumper stickers.

It’s these who scare me the most, the one’s who do not think of their guns as a last resort but as a first line of defense - shoot first and ask questions later.

-Tim-
You are actually attempting to equate justified warfare with senseless civil violence??? You try to do that and then brush off “Hollywood” as having no influence on the gun violence in inner cities? I am sorry but I am going to let the readers be the judge of our relative cases and move on to a fruitful discussion somewhere else. Have a nice day:D
 
Some guns are fine, but I support reinstating the assault rifle ban. Ak-47s are for fighting the Taliban, not your neighbor.
Since you are either disinclined to answer or unable to, I will let you know that there is no difference whatsoever. They shoot the exact same ammunition. Perhaps we should either A) learn what we are talking about; or B) stop focusing on what guns look like as justification for banning them.

articles.cnn.com/2012-07-23/us/us_texas-truck-wreck_1_crash-truck-illegal-immigrants

Anyone for banning trucks? Anyone?
 
Well some put faith in guns to protect themselves, I put my faith that Christ will protect those who pray for it.
 
Well some put faith in guns to protect themselves, I put my faith that Christ will protect those who pray for it.
Too bad none of the Christians in the Sudan thought about that while they were being raped to death.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top