Catholics and firearms

  • Thread starter Thread starter codefro
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I would and could never own a firearm. You see I have Parkinson’s, I would be as likely to shoot myself in the foot as harma burglar.

One thing I never hear from NRA members and other gun supporters at all costs, is that the 2nd amendment speaks first of militias. But they completely ignore that part.
At the time the 2nd amendment was written, with no standing army, the “militia” was the general populace.

SCOTUS recently addressed that topic in the District of Columbia v. Heller case in 2008:
The Second Amendment guarantees an individual’s right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed.
law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html
 
At the time the 2nd amendment was written, with no standing army, the “militia” was the general populace.

SCOTUS recently addressed that topic in the District of Columbia v. Heller case in 2008:

law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html
Please notice that I did not say militia alone (which I would assume the National Guard is), I just noticed that the NRA crowd ignores that facet of the 2nd amendment completely.

I don’t read the 2nd amendment protecting the “rights” of private individauls to own tanks, nukes or even machine guns.

I think that having Parkinson’s puts this in a different perspective for me.

I have no objective to individuals owning firearms for protection and sport, but that is just not right and dangerous for me.

I don’t think individuals have a right to assualt weapons, tanks or nukes, which the NRA by extension might.
 
OK, so I stand corrected. We have a moral obligation to defend the innocent. I see that.

That does not however, equate to a requirement that any one of us own a gun, or a knife, or to clench my fist in anger.
Never said it did and I never will. You have the right, just as I do, to decide what is proper for yourself in that regard.
Everything I read from the Church on the topic speaks of moderation and restraint and the one thing I learned from taking martial arts classes in my youth was that it is always better to walk away than it is to fight. There is a point where it has to stop.
Agreed. The best idea is to not put yourself in a bad situation to begin with. Believe me, I would much rather use my verbal judo and try to talk myself out of a situation or strap on the PF Flyers and do my best Jessie Owens impersonation than have any sort of violent confrontation. Unfortunately, that may not always be an option.
The gang has a gun so I get a gun. They get a better gun so I get a better gun. They get a bigger gun and so I get two guns and learn how to shoot with both hands. Then we get sub-machine guns. Now there are TV shows where women build guns that look like they came out of a Terminator movie and they build fantastic scenarios where some guy blows away two dozen mannequin “Bad guys”.
And that is far from the norm. The average person does not have access to weapons like that at all. It takes a special tax stamp and background check by the ATF for anyone to purchase a fully automatic weapon.

In addition, it is hardly fair to judge the average gun owner based on what Hollywood does or does not do. Nor is it fair to judge someone who responds to an escalation by those who are breaking the law. It is the gang members who are the criminals, not the other person. Making those analogies is like judging my right to free speech based on the pornography industry or someone spewing hate speech. Do you want to be lumped in as a Christian with the members of Westboro Baptist Church or The First Baptist Church in Crystal Springs, MS?
A society which glorifies weaponry and produces TV shows where people build bomb proof bunkers to protect their big screen TV seems to me to exhibit a fundamental lack of trust in God’s providence and I want to ask when we, as members of Christ’s Church, when do we stand down? When do we stop blaming Hollywood for violence and take the “Insured by Smith and Wesson” bumper sticker off our car? When do we say “Enough! I will not escalate this.”?
As I mentioned above when you made your last comment about such bumper stickers, when people stop threatening the rights of others to have a gun or carry a gun as they wish, I believe you will see less and less of those. Until then, people are going to be strident on the subject. Sort of like people have become strident about their religious freedoms lately. Seen the “we will not comply” statements around anywhere? Why is it OK for people to defend openly their rights to religious freedom but not their other guaranteed rights?
I’ll tell you something here that I never told anyone else. I pointed a gun at someone once. I pointed a gun at a guy at the end of my driveway and told him that if he took one more F-ing step I would pull the F-ing trigger. The whole time I was standing there with the gun pointed at him, a voice inside of me kept saying, “Don’t do this. The last thing in your life you need is to kill someone.” That was the voice of God.
It turns out the guy was drunk. I got rid of the gun the next day with the words of my father, a US Marine, ringing in my ears, “You want to own a gun? Who are you going to shoot?”
I answer now, nobody. I’m going to shoot nobody. And I won’t have to stand before Jesus and explain why I shot someone.
That is your decision to make and I support your right to feel that way and to live your life as you choose to live it. The situation you described would shake me also, as it appears to have shaken you. Where I have concern, is when that moral standard is pushed upon others who also have the right to make such decisions.

I can tell you from the depths of my soul, I never, ever, want to have to shoot someone. I pray it never happens. But I can also tell you that if the decision is between that and going home to see my wife at the end of the day, or between that and allowing her or another innocent to be harmed, then I will do what needs to be done.
 
Please notice that I did not say militia alone (which I would assume the National Guard is), I just noticed that the NRA crowd ignores that facet of the 2nd amendment completely.

I don’t read the 2nd amendment protecting the “rights” of private individauls to own tanks, nukes or even machine guns.

I think that having Parkinson’s puts this in a different perspective for me.

I have no objective to individuals owning firearms for protection and sport, but that is just not right and dangerous for me.

I don’t think individuals have a right to assualt weapons, tanks or nukes, which the NRA by extension might.
The militia was every able bodied man.
 
Please notice that I did not say militia alone (which I would assume the National Guard is), I just noticed that the NRA crowd ignores that facet of the 2nd amendment completely.

I don’t read the 2nd amendment protecting the “rights” of private individauls to own tanks, nukes or even machine guns.

I think that having Parkinson’s puts this in a different perspective for me.

I have no objective to individuals owning firearms for protection and sport, but that is just not right and dangerous for me.

I don’t think individuals have a right to assualt weapons, tanks or nukes, which the NRA by extension might.
But those “assualt weapons” are no less dangerous than a hunting rifle. It’s an appeal to emotion.

High explosive devices actual military weapons (full auto) have been regulated sine 1934, an no one commits crimes with those. There is a large fee to carry that license, and a very extensive background check by the BATF.

Sorry to hear about your Parkisons, God bless!
 
Do I think that guns are going to be made illegal no, I am just saying that would be in a perfect world.
In your view of what a perfect world is. In mine, we would have guns.
There should be serious limits on gun ownership, including number and size of guns.
Have you really thought about this? What difference does it make if I have 1 or 20 firearms? I can only shoot one at a time. Other than having different types for different purposes, such as shotgun, rifle, .22, pistol, number really doesn’t matter in any circumstance other than a society has fallen apart and I need to arm my neighbors so we can defend ourselves type of situation.
All I said is I don’t understand is how owning and using a gun is being christlike, and I think that is a fair statement. Jesus clearly opposed violence. Was he a pacifist? I don’t know, but I know that even though the Church allows for self defense, I could not personally kill a human being.
I’ve used guns thousands of times, never shot anyone. You need to accept that there are uses for firearms other than shooting people. Similar statements to yours could be applied to knives, baseball bats, and tire irons.
You’re right, guns are very multi-purpose, you can use guns to kill criminals, or kill innocent people, or kill animals for hunting, or kill endangered animals, or target shooting to practice killing something. What possible other purpose do guns have than killing, that is what they are for. They are absolutely the worst invention in history.
Since when is killing evil? Really. Most people who have guns have used them numerous times for killing, which is perfectly acceptable. God gave us dominion over the animals. They are our food, for one thing. I would wager a bet that the vast majority of shots fired in this country are at paper targets or steel silhouettes or tin cans. What’s so bad about that?
I don’t think Christ literally meant for them to go out and buy swords,
Someone just posted the scripture where Jesus told them to go and buy swords. Hopefully you have changed your position on this.
 
You’re right, guns are very multi-purpose, you can use guns to kill criminals, or kill innocent people, or kill animals for hunting, or kill endangered animals, or target shooting to practice killing something. What possible other purpose do guns have than killing, that is what they are for. They are absolutely the worst invention in history.
QUOTE]

What would you do if you are in a store during a hold-up, one of the teenage hold-up men grabs a four-year-old handicaped child and holds a knife to the child’s neck. A policeofficer comes in; gun drawn, Who dies, the innocent teenager with the knife or the child? :confused:
 
Someone just posted the scripture where Jesus told them to go and buy swords. Hopefully you have changed your position on this.
I didn’t deny that Jesus said that, but i don’t see where he is condoning violence. I also have a question, once they buy swords he says " That is enough." Is that a "That is enough 👍 " or an exasperated "That is enough! :dts: " Was jesus irritated that they took him literally? Or something else. Just a thought.
 
Guns are more multi-purpose than swords which are almost exclusively for killing. Christ told his followers to arm themselves with swords.
True, you can use firearms in shooting competitions in which nothing and nobody is killed. But fencing is part of the Olympics, too.

Guns and swords are equivalent for different eras.

ICXC NIKA
 
I didn’t deny that Jesus said that, but i don’t see where he is condoning violence. I also have a question, once they buy swords he says " That is enough." Is that a "That is enough 👍 " or an exasperated "That is enough! :dts: " Was jesus irritated that they took him literally? Or something else. Just a thought.
I have no idea what you are talking about. You seem to be making distinctions I don’t understand.

Jesus told them to buy swords. I don’t see how that is condoning violence. I also don’t see how someone today buying guns is condoning violence any more than Jesus did.

You seem to be saying that even though Jesus told them to buy swords he meant the opposite.
 
I didn’t deny that Jesus said that, but i don’t see where he is condoning violence. I also have a question, once they buy swords he says " That is enough." Is that a "That is enough 👍 " or an exasperated "That is enough! :dts: " Was jesus irritated that they took him literally? Or something else. Just a thought.
I don’t think the context was exasperated. He commanded each one to have a sword, but they only came up with two among the remaining 11 apostles.

Perhaps 2 was “enough” for their protection?
 
In 1997, my parents were involved in the bear mauling at Liard Hot Springs in British Columbia. It was a tense time when my dad was doing CPR on the bear’s first victim while the bear roamed around mauling people between him and the car. Finally, two hunters were found with sufficient firepower to down a bear. The crack of their rifles was the most beautiful sound my dad ever heard.

A gun is just a thing. What you do with it matters. Fortunately, real Catholicism understands that what Jesus said is still true: corruption comes from within. Evil does not come from food or power or weapons or whatever. Those only tempt. They’re used according to inner virtue or vice. I’m thankful that, surrounded by the Canadian superstitious fear of the “evil thunder stick”, there were a couple of U.S. citizens appropriatly armed so that my dad still lives.

As for Christianity being pacifist, or the bible being against going armed, Jesus told the apostles to carry swords (Lk 22:36).
 
jwinch2 and pete29

I want you to know that I don’t hate you, that I don’t even dislike you, that in fact I love you. You are my brothers in Christ, Sons of our Mother Mary and Chidren of God our common Father. I love you and I mean that.

I just really, really, really disagree with you on the need to own firearms and wish you wouldn’t own them, that’s all.

pete29, we did not get off to a good start on another thread, and I said something in anger which I wish I had not said. I went back to the thread to apologize but the thread was closed, probably in part because of me. So I would like to apologize to you for what I said. I had no business judging your heart.

Jason, as one who is consecrated to Mary, I am ashamed of my behavior here on this thread. I could have disagreed without all the drama. I should have been more like Mary. I will leave it there because I think you know what I am trying to say.

-Tim-
 
jwinch2 and pete29

I want you to know that I don’t hate you, that I don’t even dislike you, that in fact I love you. You are my brothers in Christ, Sons of our Mother Mary and Chidren of God our common Father. I love you and I mean that.
Thank you Tim. I appreciate that a great deal.
I just really, really, really disagree with you on the need to own firearms and wish you wouldn’t own them, that’s all.
You can agree or disagree, that is your prerogative. The difference between us on this is that I don’t wish you to own them or not own them. I have no opinion on the matter and even I did, I’d have no say in the matter, and don’t want to.

My take on things like this has always been that as long as the exercise of your rights does not infringe upon mine, then I leave you to it. As for me, I am in line with the teachings of my Church, the laws of my country, have the blessing of my family, and am following my own conscience.
Jason, as one who is consecrated to Mary, I am ashamed of my behavior here on this thread. I could have disagreed without all the drama. I should have been more like Mary. I will leave it there because I think you know what I am trying to say.
Apology accepted. Please don’t give it another thought. I fully intend to move on and hope you will also.
 
CatholicTimmy;9599463:
You’re right, guns are very multi-purpose, you can use guns to kill criminals, or kill innocent people, or kill animals for hunting, or kill endangered animals, or target shooting to practice killing something. What possible other purpose do guns have than killing, that is what they are for. They are absolutely the worst invention in history.
\QUOTE]

What would you do if you are in a store during a hold-up, one of the teenage hold-up men grabs a four-year-old handicaped child and holds a knife to the child’s neck. A policeofficer comes in; gun drawn, Who dies, the innocent teenager with the knife or the child? :confused:
?? If the teenager is helping with the holdup, doesn’t that mean he’s not innocent? Unless I misunderstood something.
 
I know that when I get a family, I will be owning a gun for purposes of self defense.
 
I know that when I get a family, I will be owning a gun for purposes of self defense.
I grew up with guns in our house. My father carried concealed.

My son is growing up with guns in the house. His mother (me) carries concealed.

I hope and pray that I never have the occasion to draw my weapon. But I also know that I will protect myself and my family if the need arises.
 
I grew up with guns in our house. My father carried concealed.

My son is growing up with guns in the house. His mother (me) carries concealed.

I hope and pray that I never have the occasion to draw my weapon. But I also know that I will protect myself and my family if the need arises.
👍👍

One person said, in an ideal world, there’d be no guns.

There’d also be no people to hurt others to use guns against.

Here’s my motto. There’s no ideal world. In an almost-ideal world, you’d have a gun, and never use it, except for sport.
 
There was a shooting in Milwauki at a Sikh Temple this morning. 7 people dead.

And all of you conservative pro-life catholics are still going to say that we don’t need gun restrictions. Guns are for self defense, yeah, how often do you need to defend yourself, vs. how many times there are mass shootings.

How long is this going to keep happening before something is done. Weapons that can kill 7 people and injure many other in several minutes should be taken off the market.
NO ONE needs that kind of weapon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top