L
Love_is_Patient
Guest
I’ve been pondering the Catholic/Evangelical divide recently, especially after reading articles like the following :catholic.com/thisrock/2002/0203fea2.asp
And I have a theory, although I’m sure I’m not the first to think of it.
Catholic (and Orthodox) spirituality tends toward the feminine. We love the Blessed Virgin Mary and hold her up as the model Christian.
Evangelical spirituality tends toward the masculine. It often seems to me that St. Paul is their unofficial patron saint.
Catholics love the Blessed Virgin for who she was and how she responded to God. Did she plant churches, get shipwrecked, give testimony in court, etc, etc? No. She simply said ‘yes’ to God every day, and pondered all she’d learned in her heart.
Evangelicals love St. Paul because he’s such a heroic Christian, actively living out his faith. He *did * so much in his life and suffered and endured and fought. He was truly a soldier for Christ (two points if you got the Confirmation reference there…
).
So it seems to me (in my interactions with evangelicals) that this masculine/feminine divide is why we don’t understand each other. They sometimes look at the BVM and our devotion and seem perplexed because - to their mind - “all” she did was give birth to Jesus and oh, yeah, she stood at the cross. She is thus worthy of mention at Christmas, then gets packed away till her brief appearance at Easter. She’s certainly not as active and heroic as St. Paul. She’s little more than a minor character in the story.
That’s not to say that Catholic spirituality is devoid of the masculine or that evangelical spirituality is devoid of the feminine. Of course there’s both in both.
What do you think? Am I close or am I missing something? Is there a good way to bridge this gap?
Love is Patient
And I have a theory, although I’m sure I’m not the first to think of it.
Catholic (and Orthodox) spirituality tends toward the feminine. We love the Blessed Virgin Mary and hold her up as the model Christian.
Evangelical spirituality tends toward the masculine. It often seems to me that St. Paul is their unofficial patron saint.
Catholics love the Blessed Virgin for who she was and how she responded to God. Did she plant churches, get shipwrecked, give testimony in court, etc, etc? No. She simply said ‘yes’ to God every day, and pondered all she’d learned in her heart.
Evangelicals love St. Paul because he’s such a heroic Christian, actively living out his faith. He *did * so much in his life and suffered and endured and fought. He was truly a soldier for Christ (two points if you got the Confirmation reference there…
So it seems to me (in my interactions with evangelicals) that this masculine/feminine divide is why we don’t understand each other. They sometimes look at the BVM and our devotion and seem perplexed because - to their mind - “all” she did was give birth to Jesus and oh, yeah, she stood at the cross. She is thus worthy of mention at Christmas, then gets packed away till her brief appearance at Easter. She’s certainly not as active and heroic as St. Paul. She’s little more than a minor character in the story.
That’s not to say that Catholic spirituality is devoid of the masculine or that evangelical spirituality is devoid of the feminine. Of course there’s both in both.
What do you think? Am I close or am I missing something? Is there a good way to bridge this gap?