A
_Abyssinia
Guest
USSCB has said Catholics For Choice ‘is an arm of the abortion lobby.’ Bishops in 1993 said ‘Catholics’ For Choice is not an ‘authentic’ Catholic organization and said it had ‘rejected unity with the church on important issues of long-standing and unchanging church teaching.’
books.google.com/books?id=LOevknhl9i8C&pg=PA106
USCCB said in 2000 ‘Catholics’ For Choice ‘is not a Catholic organization, does not speak for the Catholic Church, and in fact promotes positions contrary to the teaching of the Church as articulated by the Holy See and the NCCB,’ and that ‘its activity is directed to rejection and distortion of Catholic teaching about the respect and protection due to defenseless unborn human life.’ USSCB also said, ‘The public relations effort has ridiculed the Holy See in language reminiscent of other episodes of anti-Catholic bigotry that the Catholic Church has endured in the past.’
old.usccb.org/comm/archives/2000/00-123.shtml
Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops has twice said in 2002 and 2010 that Catholics for a Free Choice: ’1) is not Catholic and 2) does not represent the teachings or views of the Catholic Church.’
cccb.ca/site/eng/media-room/archives/public-statements/2010/2774-comment-by-the-canadian-conference-of-catholic-bishops-regarding-a-group-calling-itself-catholics-for-a-free-choice
Official newspaper of the Archdiocese of Mexico in 2003 said ‘Catholics’ For Choice is ‘not Catholic.’
catholicnewsagency.com/news/archdiocese_of_mexico_catholics_for_a_free_choice_are_not_catholic
Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz legislated automatic interdict from April 15 1996 against Catholics in his diocese who were members of Catholics For Choice (and 11 other organisations were included). He said, that membership ‘is always perilous to the Catholic Faith and most often is totally incompatible with the Catholic Faith.’ Any Catholic who remained a member for month was automatically excommunicated.
ewtn.com/library/BISHOPS/BRUSKWTZ.HTM
Helen M Alvaré, associate professor of law at Catholic University of America, has said CFC has ‘no grass roots base among Catholics.’
nytimes.com/2007/02/27/us/27choice.html
books.google.com/books?id=LOevknhl9i8C&pg=PA106
USCCB said in 2000 ‘Catholics’ For Choice ‘is not a Catholic organization, does not speak for the Catholic Church, and in fact promotes positions contrary to the teaching of the Church as articulated by the Holy See and the NCCB,’ and that ‘its activity is directed to rejection and distortion of Catholic teaching about the respect and protection due to defenseless unborn human life.’ USSCB also said, ‘The public relations effort has ridiculed the Holy See in language reminiscent of other episodes of anti-Catholic bigotry that the Catholic Church has endured in the past.’
old.usccb.org/comm/archives/2000/00-123.shtml
Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops has twice said in 2002 and 2010 that Catholics for a Free Choice: ’1) is not Catholic and 2) does not represent the teachings or views of the Catholic Church.’
cccb.ca/site/eng/media-room/archives/public-statements/2010/2774-comment-by-the-canadian-conference-of-catholic-bishops-regarding-a-group-calling-itself-catholics-for-a-free-choice
Official newspaper of the Archdiocese of Mexico in 2003 said ‘Catholics’ For Choice is ‘not Catholic.’
catholicnewsagency.com/news/archdiocese_of_mexico_catholics_for_a_free_choice_are_not_catholic
Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz legislated automatic interdict from April 15 1996 against Catholics in his diocese who were members of Catholics For Choice (and 11 other organisations were included). He said, that membership ‘is always perilous to the Catholic Faith and most often is totally incompatible with the Catholic Faith.’ Any Catholic who remained a member for month was automatically excommunicated.
ewtn.com/library/BISHOPS/BRUSKWTZ.HTM
Helen M Alvaré, associate professor of law at Catholic University of America, has said CFC has ‘no grass roots base among Catholics.’
nytimes.com/2007/02/27/us/27choice.html