T
TypesAndShadows
Guest
"Matt Guitar Man:
If a Catholic attends Mass every day for 3 years (the Sunday and Feast Day cycle is three years, and the weekday cycle is two years) they’ll have heard almost all of the Gospels (~90%), and a lot of the New Testament (~70%), and a smattering of the Old (~10%). They will never hear the book of Judith, for example.
Jerome’s Vulgate was not at all the first complete Bible. It wasn’t even the first translation of the Bible into Latin. He included some of the older “Vetus Latina” versions in his Vulgate, especially when it came to the Deuterocanon. The various Old Latin translations are why we still pray “give us this day our daily bread” and “gloria in excelsis deo”, despite these not corresponding to the Latin in Jerome’s Vulgate.
I worry that, when we include these Catholic legends in otherwise good criticisms of anti-Catholic legends, we discredit the good arguments. After all, once you spot an obvious error in a criticism, how carefully do you consider the rest of the argument? To say nothing of the general goodness of Truth!
Don’t forget, except for some of the extended genealogies and statistics in numbers etc. If a Catholic attends mass every day, in a three year period he/she will have nearly the whole Bible read to them
While we’re all enthusiastic for history and God and the Church, we should avoid spreading these sorts of Catholic urban legends.After all the very first Bible was Jerome’s *Vulgate * in about 400 AD. There were no protestants then and there would not be for another 1100+ years.
If a Catholic attends Mass every day for 3 years (the Sunday and Feast Day cycle is three years, and the weekday cycle is two years) they’ll have heard almost all of the Gospels (~90%), and a lot of the New Testament (~70%), and a smattering of the Old (~10%). They will never hear the book of Judith, for example.
Jerome’s Vulgate was not at all the first complete Bible. It wasn’t even the first translation of the Bible into Latin. He included some of the older “Vetus Latina” versions in his Vulgate, especially when it came to the Deuterocanon. The various Old Latin translations are why we still pray “give us this day our daily bread” and “gloria in excelsis deo”, despite these not corresponding to the Latin in Jerome’s Vulgate.
I worry that, when we include these Catholic legends in otherwise good criticisms of anti-Catholic legends, we discredit the good arguments. After all, once you spot an obvious error in a criticism, how carefully do you consider the rest of the argument? To say nothing of the general goodness of Truth!