A
Abu
Guest
What teachings do you not believe and why?ExCatholicGuy #18
I left because I realized that I simply didn’t believe many of Catholicism’s essential teachings.
What teachings do you not believe and why?ExCatholicGuy #18
I left because I realized that I simply didn’t believe many of Catholicism’s essential teachings.
Really, it’s the entire concept of Christianity that I don’t find plausible - the idea that an eternal, omnipresent God (who I DO believe in) would make Himself physically present on Earth for just a brief period, in a limited geographic area, to a relatively small number of people. Why would such a God preferentially reveal Himself directly to such a tiny fraction of the world’s total population since the beginning, while expecting those of us who weren’t in the right place at the right time to believe in a man-made record of His words and actions?What teachings do you not believe and why?
And Christianity has spread throughout the world into the remotest regions of the earth. How did that happen? Christ gave his mandate to the Church to go forth on foot and spread the gospel at a time when there was no mass media or communication. Do the results of this in and of itself not strike you as powerful? Even facing death and persecution the message was promulgated against all odds. Man needs God and the recognition of the Savior in the hearts of man produced an unprecedented number of martyrs, saints and witnesses of the gospel message through the power of the Holy Spirit. And what of the Resurrection itself? Do you believe it fiction?Really, it’s the entire concept of Christianity that I don’t find plausible - the idea that an eternal, omnipresent God (who I DO believe in) would make Himself physically present on Earth for just a brief period, in a limited geographic area, to a relatively small number of people. Why would such a God preferentially reveal Himself directly to such a tiny fraction of the world’s total population since the beginning, while expecting those of us who weren’t in the right place at the right time to believe in a man-made record of His words and actions?
That is proof of belief, not proof of truth. Look at the impressive worldwide spread of the Mormon faith, sometimes in the face of violent persecution, in a much shorter time period. By your standard, that could be considered proof of Mormonism’s truth.And Christianity has spread throughout the world into the remotest regions of the earth. How did that happen? He gave his message to the Church to go forth on foot and spread the gospel at a time when there was no mass media or communication. Does this not in and of itself strike you as powerful? Even facing death and persecution the message was promulgated against all odds. Man needs God and the recognition of the Savior in the hearts of man produced an unprecedented number of martyrs, saints and witnesses of the gospel message through the power of the Holy Spirit.
I don’t think it happened.And what of the Resurrection itself? Do you believe it fiction?
Well, we’ve hit on something that belongs in the philosophy section. But I like your answer because it illustrates to me why Catholics leave the Church. Not because of social teachings, nor much of any teaching, but simply because they have lost their faith - the supernatural and the essence of religion holds no meaning for those who cannot believe, and sadly, no truth can be had for them because it is simply free gift to either be accepted or rejected.That is proof of belief, not proof of truth. Look at the impressive worldwide spread of the Mormon faith, sometimes in the face of violent persecution, in a much shorter time period. By your standard, that could be considered proof of Mormonism’s truth.
This. I also know that during the 50s, the Church integrated their Catholic schools in New Orleans. Some influential Catholics denounced this. The Church made it clear that they sides with the integrationists, and so many continued repudiating this to the point where they were excommunicated. One of them even refused to set foot in a Catholic church when her son got married.If you want a concrete example, take the farm labor disputes in the 1970s. The poor migrant workers were protesting their maltreatment and unsafe working conditions against the large Catholic growers. Both the workers and the growers thought that the Church was on their side. The Church sided with the poor, and a majority of the growers who thought that the Church was on their side essentially left the Church in anger.
Don’t you know that Christ proved that He is God?ExCatholicGuy #25
I don’t think it happened. [The Resurrection]
You should consider looking into the scientific research of the Shroud of Turin, as well as the Eucharistic miracles. It doesn’t make me Catholic, but it does serve to strengthen my belief in the risen Lord.That is proof of belief, not proof of truth. Look at the impressive worldwide spread of the Mormon faith, sometimes in the face of violent persecution, in a much shorter time period. By your standard, that could be considered proof of Mormonism’s truth.
I don’t think it happened.
Always remember that the Church operates under God’s law, not the latest popular culture.Well, look at polling data from Pew. A significant number of Catholics in the USA say they disagree with the Vatican on gay marriage, contraception, etc.
You sound like one of the lines that Judas sang in “Jesus Christ Super Star”Really, it’s the entire concept of Christianity that I don’t find plausible - the idea that an eternal, omnipresent God (who I DO believe in) would make Himself physically present on Earth for just a brief period, in a limited geographic area, to a relatively small number of people. Why would such a God preferentially reveal Himself directly to such a tiny fraction of the world’s total population since the beginning, while expecting those of us who weren’t in the right place at the right time to believe in a man-made record of His words and actions?
If Jesus is, in absolute and eternal fact, the Incarnate God, then the choice for or against Him is the ultimate choosing.
We want proof…….yet, if we are clear-thinking and honest, refusing to blur the choices, we have to acknowledge, first, that there is literally no evidence against Jesus’s claim, only fuzzy assumptions like “miracles can’t happen” or “God wouldn’t work that way.”
All the same, people do reject the faith.
Evidence is not ironclad proof. We do not get to put our hand into Jesus’ wounded side. Nothing happens to us on the road to Damascus or D.C. It was all a long time ago. Theologians scatter their doubts about this or that. We live in a secular world (so like that of Imperial Rome), and the blare of the TV is much louder than the church bells…… Those who reject the faith are not, as C.S. Lewis once said, simply brave men who have logically accepted the defeat of their heart’s deepest longings for God. True, they may at moments have felt such longings, but, much more, they simply can’t be bothered to do God’s will.
The truth is that, apart from rare moments, we don’t want Christ in our lives. We don’t want a God who knows the thoughts of our hearts, some of them rather nasty. Above all, we don’t want to be creatures: we want to be autonomous, free of any outside obligations or judgment. When we reject Christianity, we, in fact, choose autonomy, as Eve did. That’s what we want: to be our own masters.
If we, not yet Christian or with only a shaky childhood belief, look into the faith, we probably feel the stirrings of an ancient and astonishing hope, but, at the same time, a fear that we don’t recognize to be fear — a fear of losing ourselves. So we pause; we hesitate; we sit on the fence, drawn and repelled, hoping somehow to find absolute certainty, which is never given. What we do not see with clarity is that we must choose — must choose — without that certainty either way.** If we refuse to choose, then we have chosen, against the faith. And we drift away.**
I guess that the Buddha and the Hindu gods must have know what they were doing as well, if not more so, considering how long those faiths have been around.God chose the time that he would be incarnate. The Faith he established has latest for over 2000 years. Which seems to me proves he knew what he was doing .
Thank you so much for sharing your personal experience. I appreciate it.I think a lot of people leave the church also because of ignorance. They were never properly catechized. I certainly wasn’t even after 12 years in a Catholic school. There were so many “Thall Shall nots… and if you do you will go to hell.” I knew so many Catholics going to mass every Sunday and being very visible around the church, but some of the meanest people you would ever meet at home, my family included. There was always the feeling of "do this, don’t do that, but no explanation as to why. It was always, “Because the church says so.” That’s hard for a young person.
I found very few Catholics that were compassionate, understanding or caring. Even now as an adult I have a hard time with how many Catholics act. When I first came back to the church about 6 years ago, this was one of the first places I came, and unfortunately had many many bad experiences here while searching for the questions I needed answers for. It was so bad I was wondering why I wanted to come back to the Church if people were so mean. Of course not everyone was, but there were quite a few. I literally almost gave up because of some of the replies I’ve seen here. Even last year with that terrible tragedy in Newtown, CT with the massacre of those poor children, there were Catholics so bent on their own agendas, they were saying things such as, “Why are people so upset about the killing of the kids in Connecticut, yet not outraged at abortion?” I was appalled at the lack of compassion in that statement. It might have been true, but at the very least, insensitive.
I think the church needs to emphasize compassion, forgiveness, love they neighbor as thyself, fellowship, etc… They’re all just as important. I’m not saying to ease up on teachings at all, as I don’t believe it can or should, just get the message across with love rather than condemnation. I’m so happy for Pope Francis-- I think he is just the Pope the church needs right now.
The fact of the Fall and the subsequent degradation of mankind, requiring the redeeming act of the Incarnation, the teaching and establishment of Christ’s Church, and the Crucifixion of the Son of God, shows the depths to which mankind descended and the kinds of spurious beliefs which were fabricated over thousands of years some having multitudinous gods and more recently, like Mormonism, promoting polygenism and their own writings.AnimalSpirits #36
I guess that the Buddha and the Hindu gods must have know what they were doing as well, if not more so, considering how long those faiths have been around.