Catholics Taking Eucharist in Protestant Churches: Need CCC cite

  • Thread starter Thread starter rr1213
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
their mind and heart is focused on Jesus in an undistracted way.
What of the mothers attending with small children? They aren’t distracted? Sorry, but when I have my (almost three year old) daughter with me, I can barely keep her seated, let alone grasp the homily. Should I skip communion until she’s older?
 
Catholics don’t seem to mind Protestants doing communion/Eucharist at their churches. I have seen some do so. I have been to Catholic services myself; but chose to quietly sit in the pew when everyone else went up. No one said a word to me for sitting there and not taking part either.

But you are right. it isn’t the same thing in our respective churches.
They would have had they known they weren’t Catholic!
 
What of the mothers attending with small children? They aren’t distracted? Sorry, but when I have my (almost three year old) daughter with me, I can barely keep her seated, let alone grasp the homily. Should I skip communion until she’s older?
No dear lady…take her up to your priest (even now) and let him bless her every time you receive the Eucharist.

Who Can Receive Communion?

and since you are new to the faith, let me encourage you to carefully read Pope John Paul the Great’s encyclical Ecclesia de Eucharistia . It’s long, but you will never find a better Eucharistic Bible study.

I printed it out (all 30 pages of it!) and it was well worth it as it was a blessed week of study with highlighters and pencils underlining and marking things that I learned.
Pax Domini sit semper vobiscum.
 
As a Protestant converting to Catholicism, I think I can actually help you with this. I’m not sure where it is in the CCC, but it has been explained to me that the Eucharist is the flesh and blood of Jesus, literally his broken body and precious blood given for us and to us, to nourish us physically and spiritually. I don’t know which denomination you come from, but I know as a UCC and even in various Mennonite and Lutheran churches I visited with friends, it was bread and wine symbolic of Jesus’ sacrifice, not his actual flesh and blood. So, they could, but it is not the Eucharist so it would not be the same. I hope that helps!
Just a technical clarification off-topic: Jesus’ earthly body was not broken in the sense of having broken bones. Maybe in the sense of being broken by being totally exhausted by physical abuse.
 
What of the mothers attending with small children? They aren’t distracted? Sorry, but when I have my (almost three year old) daughter with me, I can barely keep her seated, let alone grasp the homily. Should I skip communion until she’s older?
I feel like I have to start writing like a lawyer to keep everyone from getting offended and up in arms against me all the time - why does everyone always assume that I am insulting their children?

How about if I change it to “in general, one should be undistracted” - or “one should not be distracted by trivial and unimportant things” or something like that?
 
I understand that Catholics may not take communion in Protestant Churches (or for that matter most other other non-Catholic Churches other than the Orthodox). Can anyone please point me to the CCC teaching on this subject assuming that it is in the CCC? I’m having trouble finding it. Thanks,
I saw that there was already one quote from the CCC. However, I thought I would over you a couple more along with a web-link to the source.
CCC paragraph 1395; 1398; and 1400:
1395 By the same charity that it enkindles in us, the Eucharist preserves us from future mortal sins. The more we share the life of Christ and progress in his friendship, the more difficult it is to break away from him by mortal sin. The Eucharist is not ordered to the forgiveness of mortal sins—that is proper to the sacrament of Reconciliation. The Eucharist is properly the sacrament of those who are in full communion with the Church.

1398 The Eucharist and the unity of Christians. Before the greatness of this mystery St. Augustine exclaims, “O sacrament of devotion! O sign of unity! O bond of charity!” The more painful the experience of the divisions in the Church which break the common participation in the table of the Lord, the more urgent are our prayers to the Lord that the time of complete unity among all who believe in him may return.

1400 Ecclesial communities derived from the Reformation and separated from the Catholic Church, “have not preserved the proper reality of the Eucharistic mystery in its fullness, especially because of the absence of the sacrament of Holy Orders.” It is for this reason that, for the Catholic Church, Eucharistic intercommunion with these communities is not possible. However these ecclesial communities, “when they commemorate the Lord’s death and resurrection in the Holy Supper . . . profess that it signifies life in communion with Christ and await his coming in glory.”

Source: usccb.org/catechism/text/pt2sect2chpt1art3.htm#ii
Hope this helps,
God Bless
 
I feel like I have to start writing like a lawyer to keep everyone from getting offended and up in arms against me all the time - why does everyone always assume that I am insulting their children?

How about if I change it to “in general, one should be undistracted” - or “one should not be distracted by trivial and unimportant things” or something like that?
Don’t sweat it…I knew what ya meant. 👍

“in so far as possible” LOL
 
Catholics don’t seem to mind Protestants doing communion/Eucharist at their churches. I have seen some do so. I have been to Catholic services myself; but chose to quietly sit in the pew when everyone else went up. No one said a word to me for sitting there and not taking part either.

But you are right. it isn’t the same thing in our respective churches.
You did the correct thing. Taking the Eucharist is a sign of unity with that congregation as well as actually taking the physical body of Christ inside ones own body.

The Catholics who did so in a Protestant church were NOT doing the correct thing. Further, unless it was a special occasion like a marriage or other specially allowed “shared” event, they should not even have been there period.🙂
 
Further, unless it was a special occasion like a marriage or other specially allowed “shared” event, they should not even have been there period.
I agree that a Catholic cannot take communion in a Protestant Church and cannot substitute a Protestant Church service for the obligation of the Sunday Mass. Those points are indisputable. What is less certain are those instances when it is appropriate for Catholics to worship at a Protestant service. Some say never…others say that it is fine in instances, for example, where it is necessary to keep the peace in the family. I’ve not seen anything authoritative one way or the other…anybody have anything to offer in that regard?
 
Catholics don’t seem to mind Protestants doing communion/Eucharist at their churches. I have seen some do so. I have been to Catholic services myself; but chose to quietly sit in the pew when everyone else went up. No one said a word to me for sitting there and not taking part either.

But you are right. it isn’t the same thing in our respective churches.
  • Dont seem to mind? They dont know who’s Catholic and who’s not when people go up for Holy Communion. They simply assume, unless the person behaves in an inappropriate way, that they are Catholic.
  • Not all Catholics will go up for Communion either. If they have an unconfessed Mortal sin they should wait until they have gone to Confession.
  • On the inside of the front cover of every single Misallette of every Catholic Church I have ever attended is the protocol for who may and who may not recieve Holy Communion. It is unambiguous.
 
Just to make sure that those who are not Catholics have the straight facts on this issue I will c&p the parts of Ecclesia de Eucharistia that make this perfectly clear.
  1. In considering the Eucharist as the sacrament of ecclesial communion, there is one subject which, due to its importance, must not be overlooked: I am referring to the relationship of the Eucharist to ecumenical activity. We should all give thanks to the Blessed Trinity for the many members of the faithful throughout the world who in recent decades have felt an ardent desire for unity among all Christians. The Second Vatican Council, at the beginning of its Decree on Ecumenism, sees this as a special gift of God.89 It was an efficacious grace which inspired us, the sons and daughters of the Catholic Church and our brothers and sisters from other Churches and Ecclesial Communities, to set forth on the path of ecumenism.
Our longing for the goal of unity prompts us to turn to the Eucharist, which is the supreme sacrament of the unity of the People of God, in as much as it is the apt expression and the unsurpassable source of that unity.90 In the celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice the Church prays that God, the Father of mercies, will grant his children the fullness of the Holy Spirit so that they may become one body and one spirit in Christ.91 In raising this prayer to the Father of lights, from whom comes every good endowment and every perfect gift (cf. Jas 1:17), the Church believes that she will be heard, for she prays in union with Christ her Head and Spouse, who takes up this plea of his Bride and joins it to that of his own redemptive sacrifice.
**44. Precisely because the Church’s unity, which the Eucharist brings about through the Lord’s sacrifice and by communion in his body and blood, absolutely requires full communion in the bonds of the profession of faith, the sacraments and ecclesiastical governance, it is not possible to celebrate together the same Eucharistic liturgy until those bonds are fully re-established. Any such concelebration would not be a valid means, and might well prove instead to be an obstacle, to the attainment of full communion, by weakening the sense of how far we remain from this goal and by introducing or exacerbating ambiguities with regard to one or another truth of the faith. The path towards full unity can only be undertaken in truth. In this area, the prohibitions of Church law leave no room for uncertainty,92 in fidelity to the moral norm laid down by the Second Vatican Council.93
I would like nonetheless to reaffirm what I said in my Encyclical Letter Ut Unum Sint after having acknowledged the impossibility of Eucharistic sharing: “And yet we do have a burning desire to join in celebrating the one Eucharist of the Lord, and this desire itself is already a common prayer of praise, a single supplication. Together we speak to the Father and increasingly we do so ‘with one heart’”.94
  1. While it is never legitimate to concelebrate in the absence of full communion, the same is not true with respect to the administration of the Eucharist under special circumstances, to individual persons belonging to Churches or Ecclesial Communities not in full communion with the Catholic Church. In this case, in fact, the intention is to meet a grave spiritual need for the eternal salvation of an individual believer, not to bring about an intercommunion which remains impossible until the visible bonds of ecclesial communion are fully re-established.**
This was the approach taken by the Second Vatican Council when it gave guidelines for responding to Eastern Christians separated in good faith from the Catholic Church, who spontaneously ask to receive the Eucharist from a Catholic minister and are properly disposed.95 This approach was then ratified by both Codes, which also consider – with necessary modifications – the case of other non-Eastern Christians who are not in full communion with the Catholic Church.96
**46. In my Encyclical Ut Unum Sint I expressed my own appreciation of these norms, which make it possible to provide for the salvation of souls with proper discernment: “It is a source of joy to note that Catholic ministers are able, in certain particular cases, to administer the sacraments of the Eucharist, Penance and Anointing of the Sick to Christians who are not in full communion with the Catholic Church but who greatly desire to receive these sacraments, freely request them and manifest the faith which the Catholic Church professes with regard to these sacraments. Conversely, in specific cases and in particular circumstances, Catholics too can request these same sacraments from ministers of Churches in which these sacraments are valid”.97
These conditions, from which no dispensation can be given, must be carefully respected, even though they deal with specific individual cases, because the denial of one or more truths of the faith regarding these sacraments and, among these, the truth regarding the need of the ministerial priesthood for their validity, renders the person asking improperly disposed to legitimately receiving them. And the opposite is also true: Catholics may not receive communion in those communities which lack a valid sacrament of Orders.98**
The faithful observance of the body of norms established in this area 99 is a manifestation and, at the same time, a guarantee of our love for Jesus Christ in the Blessed Sacrament, for our brothers and sisters of different Christian confessions – who have a right to our witness to the truth – and for the cause itself of the promotion of unity.
 
So what’s the scoop with divided families? If children convert to the Catholic faith, can they still attend Protestant services when visiting their folk’s home assuming that they: (i) don’t take communion and (ii) still go to Catholic Mass? What about when a wife converts, can she still attend church with her Protestant husband assuming that she also doesn’t take communion and doesn’t forego her Sunday obligation? I’ve seen multiple and conflicting answers to these sorts of questions from a number of different Catholics over the years. Some say…“of course, provided the above caveats are observed” and others insist “no way…not all all.” Has the Catholic Church spoken on this common question or not?
 
So what’s the scoop with divided families? If children convert to the Catholic faith, can they still attend Protestant services when visiting their folk’s home assuming that they: (i) don’t take communion and (ii) still go to Catholic Mass? What about when a wife converts, can she still attend church with her Protestant husband assuming that she also doesn’t take communion and doesn’t forego her Sunday obligation? I’ve seen multiple and conflicting answers to these sorts of questions from a number of different Catholics over the years. Some say…“of course, provided the above caveats are observed” and others insist “no way…not all all.” Has the Catholic Church spoken on this common question or not?
The best thing to do is for the individual who has the question, to consult with a priest who is known to be faithful to the Magisterium, and who knows the person and his/her family reasonably well, to help them discern the answer to this question for their own pastoral situation.

It can be spiritually dangerous to become exposed to the Protestant way of thinking for long periods at a time; it can also be unhealthy for a marriage for the couple not to worship together somewhere, and if one party is absolutely refusing to step foot in a Catholic church, then it may be allowable for the Catholic party to attend Protestant services with his/her spouse.

When it was me asking the question, the priest told me to stop attending Protestant services altogether and to focus exclusively on the Mass, even though my family still attends their Protestant church.
 
The best thing to do is for the individual who has the question, to consult with a priest who is known to be faithful to the Magisterium, and who knows the person and his/her family reasonably well, to help them discern the answer to this question for their own pastoral situation.

It can be spiritually dangerous to become exposed to the Protestant way of thinking for long periods at a time; it can also be unhealthy for a marriage for the couple not to worship together somewhere, and if one party is absolutely refusing to step foot in a Catholic church, then it may be allowable for the Catholic party to attend Protestant services with his/her spouse.

When it was me asking the question, the priest told me to stop attending Protestant services altogether and to focus exclusively on the Mass, even though my family still attends their Protestant church.
Thanks, but I don’t see why there isn’t a definitive answer to this question. It seems that the Church defines everything else, why not address this issue? It is a common and very real, very painful problem for many “mixed” marriages and families.
 
Thanks, but I don’t see why there isn’t a definitive answer to this question. It seems that the Church defines everything else, why not address this issue? It is a common and very real, very painful problem for many “mixed” marriages and families.
Well, it’s possible that the reason there is no “one size fits all” answer is because this is a case where one size does not actually fit all.

If you are in this situation, my recommendation to you would be to consult with a good priest who knows you and knows the circumstances of your family.
 
So what’s the scoop with divided families? If children convert to the Catholic faith, can they still attend Protestant services when visiting their folk’s home assuming that they: (i) don’t take communion and (ii) still go to Catholic Mass? What about when a wife converts, can she still attend church with her Protestant husband assuming that she also doesn’t take communion and doesn’t forego her Sunday obligation? I’ve seen multiple and conflicting answers to these sorts of questions from a number of different Catholics over the years. Some say…“of course, provided the above caveats are observed” and others insist “no way…not all all.” Has the Catholic Church spoken on this common question or not?
(The following sentence is humorously intended) It almost seems like the answer being sought is one of “How close can I come to violating Canon Law without quite violating it?”😉

In times past, it was absolutely forbidden to attend one another’s services due to the strife and fallout from the Protestant reformation. However, since the Catholic Church now recognizes that Protestants are our separated brethren, it may be allowed in some circumstances and disallowed in others.

Part of the difficulty in this query is that the answer is a pastoral one, not a doctrinal one, since the doctrinal element has been removed by realization that intercommunion is forbidden and the Sunday for the Catholic entails Mass must still be attended. In this situation, therefore, there is no hard and fast ruling since the Code of Canon Law is not being violated. However…

A priest may permit limited attendance at Protestant services if he knows that doing so will not present a danger to the faith of the person seeking permission, and may help prevent division and a hardening of hearts among those family members who are not Catholic. But care has to be taken to ensure that the person does not lose his Catholic faith and, if a convert, reverts back to his former religion, as happened in the sad case of Bill Cork.

A risk is exposure to a mindset that can over time erode faith or even virulently attack it, such as was faced by the early converts to Christianity who still attended Sabbat’ services with their Jewish brethren as well as the Sunday Mass. When the rabbis inserted the Curse Against the Minim (Christians) into the 18 Benedictions, the Christians were compelled to stop attending because the invocations were directed at themselves and their loved ones. Many of those who had to leave were undoubtedly heartbroken to leave behind their unconverted family members, but they had to do so to remain Christian. In modern times, attending a Protestant service that does not attack Catholicism may be allowed, while those that promote indifferentism and/or attack the Catholic faith would not.
Thanks, but I don’t see why there isn’t a definitive answer to this question. It seems that the Church defines everything else, why not address this issue? It is a common and very real, very painful problem for many “mixed” marriages and families.
That is one reason the Church discourages disparity of cult in marriage. Even so, the Catholic Church defines what must be defined and leaves untouched that which is malleable, such as pastoral issues. And while I appreciate how difficult this must be for those families that have this situation, Jesus Christ never promised that it would be easy to follow Him. He actually mentioned that it would be the opposite, with loved ones fighting and separating when some would follow Him and others wouldn’t. While it might be debatable as to which side follows Him best, that potential for division remains a real possibility. One also sees this type of tension in families where some members continue to practice their faith and others lapse. There are no simple or easy answers to every situation, and the Church’s pastoral approach, as others here have indicated, is such that it takes into account the individual involved.

Yours in Christ,
Dominicanis
 
Catholics don’t seem to mind Protestants doing communion/Eucharist at their churches. I have seen some do so. I have been to Catholic services myself; but chose to quietly sit in the pew when everyone else went up. No one said a word to me for sitting there and not taking part either.

But you are right. it isn’t the same thing in our respective churches.
If my priest thinks that you are not a Catholic he will ask you. If you affirm that you are not he will not give you the Body and Blood. This is the NORM. Those not in communion with Rome are not to receive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top