Catholism's stand on capitol punishment

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJSTEARNS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I just want to clarify your post. You say that not all laws in the OT are applicable in our time. Consequently, you are against stoning now (because it is outside of what American laws permit), but if they did permit it, you would be okay with it.

So if the American penal laws outlawed capital punishment, then you would categorize it as one of those laws from the OT that isn’t applicable any more, and therefore shouldn’t be done.

Is that not putting your beliefs in the penal system rather than the Word of God?
Well, not really. What I’m saying is that if it’s not prohibited then it would depend on our conviction on whether or not to apply or mete out the penalty. I don’t think it is compulsory for everyone to allow the death penalty, but if a certain country or state would do so, then it should not be condemned by other Christians. Although not on all fours with the instant case, I suppose we could loosely apply Romans 14 by analogy.
 
I do get what you are saying. By the way I am a lawyer too.

So we pick and choose on the penalties in the OT. What about the stoning of a woman who commits adultery? So you would be alright with that too if secular law provides for it? Could you please quote from the Gospels where Christ said slaves should obey their masters? So if slaves were legal that would be alright too?

I was not in your class but your instructor’s words as paraphrased may well mean something rather different from issues like the death penalty. My apologies if that is what he meant.

I have read what the RCC says. Yes while it does not absolutely prohibit the death penalty it says other means should be used if possible, to paraphase. There are other ways of treating such criminals. Why then are all those religious of the RCC protesting outside prisons when someone is to be executed? By the way, I do think the RCC should prohibit the death penalty.

Justice is dealt out by human beings. Human beings are not perfect.
Great then! First, it was not in the Gospels that slves were instructed to obey their masters, but in the epistles of Paul, specifically, Eph. 6:5-9. It also inctructed masters on how to treat their slaves.

Second, as to picking and choosing the laws from the OT, what I’m saying is that if it’s not prohibited then it would depend on our conviction on whether or not to apply or mete out the penalty. I don’t think it is compulsory for everyone to allow the death penalty, but if a certain country or state would do so, then it should not be condemned by other Christians. Although not on all fours with the topic at hand, I suppose we could loosely apply Romans 14 by analogy.

Lastly, yes, humans are not perfect, but God uses the imperfect and foolish things of this world to fulfil His purposes and will. 🙂
 
I am under the impression that we are to forgive the sinner, not the sin. it is for god to forgive the sin. Thou shalt no kill. So, if your going to go by the rules, the vote is a ney on capital punishment.
 
Stating that the reason to stop capital punsihment because of the cost is placing a price on the lives of those that convicted killers murder in prison. Prisoner’s and prison guard’s lives are just as priceless as any free member of society.

Also, stating that capital punishment does not reduce crime igmores the fact that if capital punishment was carried out swiftly, publicly, and without unlimited appeals, you would see the murder rate fall like water over a falls.

Eddie Mac
 
Also, stating that capital punishment does not reduce crime igmores the fact that if capital punishment was carried out swiftly, publicly, and without unlimited appeals, you would see the murder rate fall like water over a falls.
I disagree with that. I think most murders are results of poverty (i.e. gang related murders), which means they have nothing to lose. It’s a social issue, not an issue of threat.
 
Stating that the reason to stop capital punsihment because of the cost is placing a price on the lives of those that convicted killers murder in prison. Prisoner’s and prison guard’s lives are just as priceless as any free member of society.

Also, stating that capital punishment does not reduce crime igmores the fact that if capital punishment was carried out swiftly, publicly, and without unlimited appeals, you would see the murder rate fall like water over a falls.

Eddie Mac
In Saudi Arabia, capital punisment is carried out very swiftly, publicly and there is very limited appeal rights. So are they being very Christian like you, I wonder. Sorry, do not understand your first point.
 
I disagree with that. I think most murders are results of poverty (i.e. gang related murders), which means they have nothing to lose. It’s a social issue, not an issue of threat.
There has always been poverty. There has not always been gangs. Killing someone because you have no respect for another’s life is not related to being poor. All poor are not gang bangers. Your argumant is a non-sequiter.

Eddie Mac
 
In Saudi Arabia, capital punisment is carried out very swiftly, publicly and there is very limited appeal rights. So are they being very Christian like you, I wonder. Sorry, do not understand your first point.
Your argument is a non-sequiter as well. You did not mention the cost of a capital punishment trial and execution, in Sudi Arabia, you just attacked me and called me un christian which in and of itself is just an attempt to sully me and not may stance. Your assertion has no basis on fact so attack me.

Since church councils and numerous saints have been quoted that support capital punishment I guess we have un christian saints too. Where does that place you?
If the argument is about cost of capityal punishment, reduce the cost by doing it properly. We incurr the cost because we value liberlism’s idea of justice. If you want to reduce the cost, remove lineralism from the equation.

Eddie Mac
 
Your argument is a non-sequiter as well. You did not mention the cost of a capital punishment trial and execution, in Sudi Arabia, you just attacked me and called me un christian which in and of itself is just an attempt to sully me and not may stance. Your assertion has no basis on fact so attack me.

Since church councils and numerous saints have been quoted that support capital punishment I guess we have un christian saints too. Where does that place you?
If the argument is about cost of capityal punishment, reduce the cost by doing it properly. We incurr the cost because we value liberlism’s idea of justice. If you want to reduce the cost, remove lineralism from the equation.

Eddie Mac
I was attacking your call for swift, public, without repeated appeals execution. Why swift and public? The appeal system is about the justice system. The argument against capital punishment is not about costs, if you mean monetary costs. If you mean the cost of the possibility of injustice being done, it is a very high cost indeed. Yes blame it all on the liberals. Christians should be liberal with our charity and forgiveness. With regard to your reference to saints etc, surely in this time and age we are more civilised in the real sense of the word and place more value on justice, liberty and life.
 
I was attacking your call for swift, public, without repeated appeals execution. Why swift and public?
Because it improves the deterrent value of capital punishment. The would-be criminal would know that he’d be executed within in a reasonable time, as opposed to sitting in death row for twenty or thirty years. Public executions also act as a deterrent. All you need to do is put yourself in the place of the murderer. Would you rather be executed in front of hundreds, thousands, even millions of people, or would you rather be in a small room inside where no one will see you, except maybe two or three guards?
The appeal system is about the justice system. The argument against capital punishment is not about costs, if you mean monetary costs. If you mean the cost of the possibility of injustice being done, it is a very high cost indeed. Yes blame it all on the liberals. Christians should be liberal with our charity and forgiveness.
Once again, “justice is not about the passions” (Summa Theologica, Secunda Secundae Partis, Question 58, Art. 9). Vengeance is about the passions; therefore, justice is not about vengeance.
With regard to your reference to saints etc, surely in this time and age we are more civilised in the real sense of the word and place more value on justice, liberty and life.
Are you really saying that today’s theologians place more value on justice, liberty, and life, than did several of the earliest popes, St Augustine, and St. Thomas?
 
I was attacking your call for swift, public, without repeated appeals execution. Why swift and public? The appeal system is about the justice system. The argument against capital punishment is not about costs, if you mean monetary costs. If you mean the cost of the possibility of injustice being done, it is a very high cost indeed. Yes blame it all on the liberals. Christians should be liberal with our charity and forgiveness. With regard to your reference to saints etc, surely in this time and age we are more civilised in the real sense of the word and place more value on justice, liberty and life.
Forgiveness has nothing to do with justice and punishment for crime.

The church’s standards for sainthood has not changed and never will.

The church cannot say that for 2000 years their stance on capital punishment was wrong and call do-overs because they are more enlightened. God cannot change and the church’s teachings cannot do a 180 and say all capital punishment is wrong.

It is an opinion that all capital punishment must be oposed and it bears no more weight than your opinion.

If you think today we are more civilized, I dare say the fact that we sacrifice millions of children a year to the idol of secular humanism counters your argument.

Eddie Mac
 
It is not possible or legal to lock someone up 24/7 for life.

There was a recent execution of a prisoner who had committed murder from his prison cell. There was just no way to protect society from that prisoner. So, with all due process, he was finally removed from society so that he could no longer kill others.
 
There has always been poverty. There has not always been gangs. Killing someone because you have no respect for another’s life is not related to being poor. All poor are not gang bangers. Your argumant is a non-sequiter.

Eddie Mac
Gangs such as MS-13 are a big money drug business. We need to pay more attention to them. In addition, they use capital punishment very effectively for their own purposes.
 
Forgiveness has nothing to do with justice and punishment for crime.

The church’s standards for sainthood has not changed and never will.

The church cannot say that for 2000 years their stance on capital punishment was wrong and call do-overs because they are more enlightened. God cannot change and the church’s teachings cannot do a 180 and say all capital punishment is wrong.

It is an opinion that all capital punishment must be oposed and it bears no more weight than your opinion.

If you think today we are more civilized, I dare say the fact that we sacrifice millions of children a year to the idol of secular humanism counters your argument.

Eddie Mac
I have not commented on and am not commenting on the RCC’s criteria for sainthood.

Please go to the link on the RCC Cathechism given by 1ke on the first page of this thread where the RCC’s position oncapital punishment is clearly stated.

My opinion bears at least as much weight as yours.

Who is sacrificing these children? Please explain what you mean rather than throwing out figures and terms like “secular humanism.”

I hope Man has learnt more over the ages. For instance in medieval times women who had some knowledge of healing were burnt at the stake, animals were executed for crimes. There were popes who were more interested in politics and some who had mistresses and children.
 
Because it improves the deterrent value of capital punishment. The would-be criminal would know that he’d be executed within in a reasonable time, as opposed to sitting in death row for twenty or thirty years. Public executions also act as a deterrent. All you need to do is put yourself in the place of the murderer. Would you rather be executed in front of hundreds, thousands, even millions of people, or would you rather be in a small room inside where no one will see you, except maybe two or three guards?
This argument of yours is weak because : what is a deterrant for one may not be a deterrant for another. Living on death row for thirty years is far less preferable than being killed immediately. The reasons should be obvious. If not, let me give you a hint-prison is no fun. Being in prison on death row, not knowing when but knowing that you will be killed eventually, no bed of roses either. I think prison in itself is a detterant in itself. If that doesnt deter someone, I dont know what will.

Also I would rather be executed in public personally. Not a deterrant for me if I was considering murdering someone. The fact that I, even one person, thinks this shows that there is no guarantee that public executions have the positive effect you speak of. Swift? The short time will mean a greater chance the wrong person is convicted. Would that be okay? Or is only the life of the unborn of worth?
 
]
Because it improves the deterrent value of capital punishment. The would-be criminal would know that he’d be executed within in a reasonable time, as opposed to sitting in death row for twenty or thirty years. Public executions also act as a deterrent. All you need to do is put yourself in the place of the murderer. Would you rather be executed in front of hundreds, thousands, even millions of people, or would you rather be in a small room inside where no one will see you, except maybe two or three guards?

That is subjective. Some would not want to be in death row for a long time and would prefer early execution. What about justice? The convicted person should be given all the rights to appeal and to ask for clemency especially if he has been sentenced to death, because of the finality of his sentence. Would it really matter to the person being executed
? The shame would be on the spectaors to the execution, spectators to another blood sport!
Once again, “justice is not about the passions” (Summa Theologica, Secunda Secundae Partis, Question 58, Art. 9). Vengeance is about the passions; therefore, justice is not about vengeance.
 
After reading the Catechism I do understand the Church’s view a little more. However if they were to try to re-introduce it here in the UK I would be up protesting outside Parliament, signing petitions, basically whatever it took to prevent it from happening.

God bless,

Katherine
 
I have not commented on and am not commenting on the RCC’s criteria for sainthood.

Please go to the link on the RCC Cathechism given by 1ke on the first page of this thread where the RCC’s position oncapital punishment is clearly stated.

My opinion bears at least as much weight as yours.

Who is sacrificing these children? Please explain what you mean rather than throwing out figures and terms like “secular humanism.”

I hope Man has learnt more over the ages. For instance in medieval times women who had some knowledge of healing were burnt at the stake, animals were executed for crimes. There were popes who were more interested in politics and some who had mistresses and children.
The church’s position is not dogma. The church has not said that supporting capital punishment is grave matter and doing so excommunicates one from the church.

You made a statement about this civilized society of ours. Our civilized sociryt aborts millions of children around the world each year. They are sacrificed to the religion of secular humanism. Secular humanism is the root of “New Age” thought. You have heard of New Age? The New Age thought lends itself to moral relativism and other evils. You should have heard of secular humanism. Do a search.

Yes, man has learned much over the ages and it isn’t how to treat each other better. I do not know what Pollyanna world you live in, but the way I look at the world, we don’t have much further to go until the Mighty Hand of God makes an adjustment.

Yes, your opinion matter as much as mine. My opinion matters as much as any clergy when it is just an opinion. I do know about prisons and capital punishment. I have family who are employed by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. They are prison guards.

Eddie Mac
 
I do know about prisons and capital punishment. I have family who are employed by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. They are prison guards.
Those that deal with evil men understand in a way that those who sleep in peace at night while others take watch can never comprehend. I am glad to live in Texas, even more after this travesty of justice in Scotland. It has added data to the prudence of a death penalty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top