Catholocism the only true choice

  • Thread starter Thread starter David_Vestal
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You fail to see alot. There are many books supposedly about the Reformation that are just plainly biased Catholic disdain for it. This appears to just be another of those.
One I would suggest is by Karl Adam, called Roots of the Reformation.

And you don’t have top buy it… read it all right here:

ewtn.com/library/CHISTORY/RTREF.TXT

It is very fair, and very critical of the Catholic Church where the Church deserves it.

But the value is in its honesty. Perhaps you will give it a look.

.
 
are there any Priests here. Will you tell me how much time is dedicated % wise to the study of scripture in the Seminary? Be honest now for I have sources that tell me none to little. Yes they are Priests.
How much time %, is spent on Scripture in your “worship service”, if you have one?

In the Catholic Mass, we hear the Scripture in such quantity… from the PRIEST, that we hear virtually the entire Bible every three years.

Let’s see… aware at say age 10… still alive at age 70 perhaps… could have heard (over and above any personal reading or Bible Studies) the Scriptures 20 times…

Another reason why Catholicism is the only True Choice.
 
It appears that “back from” was on line until I posted my challenge.

I pray that he/she left to read the links I provided.

We shall see…
 
I have the book… many copies.

And I offer them to any non-Catholic who is interested in faulting the Catholic Church… if

If they will also take a copy of
The Gospel According to James McCarthy by Gary Michuta

and read them both. That is fair.

If you would promise to do the same, I will even send you a copy.

or…

you can go to this site and read them both at the same time…
bringyou.to/apologetics/a101.htm section I

bringyou.to/apologetics/a102.htm section II

bringyou.to/apologetics/a103.htm section III

bringyou.to/apologetics/a64.htm section IV

“Should be easy for you to follow. If you want to learn the truth of what you have chosen death for”

Then, after we have both listened to both sides, we can discuss.

So…I have accepted your challenge to read the book you suggest, now will you at least accept the challange I offer … and you don’t even have to buy the book.

May God give you the courage to do so.

.
this link might work better…

bringyou.to/apologetics/a64.htm
 
Isn’t it funny how I produce for you time and again things you cannot refute to only then change the questions or focus. In the words of some pro wrestler, “😦 Just when you think you have all the answers, I change the questions”
I don’t thin that you have a point do you? but thanks for the compliment on doing a great job. God not I though.
No answer. Correct?
 
sorry nice try. I have supported the finished work of the cross. Yes you do have to believe. ,
So Jesus didnt finish his work on the cross? We are still required to take action to be saverd.

Having admited you error on that will you now tell us where Scripture speaks of invisible Church of people with very different beliefs?
 
First funny how you are denying your own church’s prayers and doctrines. Holy mary mother of God (she was not the mother of God a very important use of words here)
Really? (I deny no such thing…though you wish I did.) Then who was the mother of Jesus? This is a very old heresy answered way early in church history. (Something you’d know if you really bothered to study it.)

You name yourself “Protestant” and yet you deny the very teachings that the three “Pillars of the Reformation” preached about this very important topic. Read it and weep:
The three “pillars of the reformation”, Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli, all believed that Mary was the mother of God.
Mother of God
Martin Luther:
“In this work whereby she was made the Mother of God, so many and such good things were given her that no one can grasp them… Not only was Mary the mother of Him who is born [in Bethlehem], but of Him who, before the world, was eternally born of the Father, from a Mother in time and at the same time man and God.” (The Works of Luther, English translation by Pelikan, Concordia, St. Louis, Vol. 7, page 572)

John Calvin: “It cannot be denied that God in choosing and destining Mary to be the Mother of His Son, granted her the highest honor…Elizabeth calls Mary Mother of the Lord, because the unity of the person in the two natures of Christ was such that she could have said that the mortal man engendered in the womb of Mary was at the same time the eternal God.” (Calvini Opera, Corpus reformatorum, Braunschweig-Berlin, 1863-1900, Vol. 45, page 348 and 335.)

Ulrich Zwingli: “It was given to her what belongs to no creature, that in the flesh she should bring forth the Son of God.” ( Zwingli Opera, Corpus reformatorum, Berlin, 1905, in Evang. Luc., Op. Comp., Vol.
6, I, page 639.)
pray for us sinners (you have one mediator the man Christ Jesus, no other name under heaven)
That’s not mediation…that’s intercession, another thing altogether. I can’t recount to you how many time I have heard n-C preachers say from their pulpits during their “invitations”, “Just slip your hand up and back down so that we can pray for you…” It’s the same sort of intercession.
now and at the hour of our death (because you have not salvation. You cannot not know the peace inb the anticipation of death that Paul talks about in being absent from the body)
This is just more rhetoric. I know that in my own life I have no great fear of death ***because of ***my faith. I long to face my Lord and and embrace His feet in praise and thanksgiving for the mercy He has given me and the terrible sacrifice that He endured for me.

I live every moment of every day in that hope of salvation. 1st Thessalonians 5:8 But let us, who are of the day, be sober, having on the breastplate of faith and charity, and for a helmet the hope of salvation

I have no doubt that most of my fellow Catholic brethren will express some similar hope and faith.
You mention heretic teachings that is exactly what the cc is. AND YOU KNOW IT! For that and that alone you may stand condemned. If I were you and you really worship our Lord I would fall on my knees and pray for His forgiveness and leave Mary (who does not hear you) out of it.
Really? I think not! In fact, I can point to several statements you have made which do indeed fall under historically verifiable condemned heresies from even so far back as the first 3 centuries of Christianity.

In fact, I know no heretical beliefs in my life. I dumped them once I came to the realization that that is what they were as I compared them, their sources, and both the Word of God and authentic Catholic teaching.
I never said that the cc is wrong about everything.
One cannot tell from your diatribes…
It has started in me an awareness of things of God and a love for my Lord. I am gratefull eternally that as well God showed me truth so that He could grow my faith.
This is about the only thing that I can agree with. Perhaps and God willing, as you do grow, you will see that your teachers and preachers have led you astray and deceived you. That is a hope that i hang my prayers for you upon.
You are so lost and as usual those lost cannot see it despite Gods words.
I could assert the same of you, but I won’t.
If He chooses to soften your hearts He will. This is not my fight but the Lords. As said best in Jude, Let the Lord rebuke you! and btw He will.
Nice out of context reference there. I’m well familiar with that verse in St. Jude’s epistle, which actually reads as follows in context.[8] Yet in like manner these men in their dreamings defile the flesh, reject authority, and revile the glorious ones.
[9] But when the archangel Michael, contending with the devil, disputed about the body of Moses, he did not presume to pronounce a reviling judgment upon him, but said, “The Lord rebuke you.”
[10] But these men revile whatever they do not understand, and by those things that they know by instinct as irrational animals do, they are destroyed.
[11] Woe to them! For they walk in the way of Cain, and abandon themselves for the sake of gain to Balaam’s error, and perish in Korah’s rebellion.

Unfortunately for you, this citation applies to those who have embraced errors and heresies and departed from the Church that Christ founded. (Who do you suppose that might be? :whistle: Not the Catholic Church as it has been proven here…)

Worse still, this is a passage that proves that even the apostles set Sacred Tradition on a level with their own writings because this does not quote the Old Testament, but the non canonical Jewish traditional text of The Assumption of Moses. :eek: Yet you just quoted it as inspired and the Church accepted it as such along with the other 26 books of the NT canon.
 
backfrmthebrink;3913481:
ChurchMilitant:

Looks ot me like you are getting very close to accepting pre-destination here. But then that is another Proetstant innovation(well for those elect Proestatnts where the Spirit has whispered it into their ears that is.

You have yet to explain to anyone how it is if the Sprit leads us to the Truth there are so many different protestant denominations. Unless you are imlying pre-destination and the Spirit leads only a select few to the truth.
Actually, belief in predestination predates Protestantism by about 1,000 years (check out Augustine’s writings). Your Church accepts pre-destination–it’s not a Protestant heresy.

The Thomists, the Augustinians, the majority of the Scotists and also individual older Molinists (Suarez, St. Bellarmine) teach an absolute Predestination (ad gloriam tantum), therefore ante praevisa merita. According to them, God freely resolves from all Eternity, without consideration of the merits of man’s grace, to call certain men to beatification and therefore to bestow on them graces which will infallibly secure the execution of the Divine Decree (ordo intentionis). In time God first gives to the predestined effective graces and then eternal bliss as a reward for the merits which flow from their free cooperation with grace (ordo executionis). The ordo intentionis and the ordo executionis are in inverse relation to each other (glory-grace; grace-glory).

Your argument that Protestantism is flawed because we have so many divisions ignores the fact that the major theories of predestination which (you imply) divide Protestantism are both contained and accepted within your Church (Thomist theories of salvation are accepted as are Molinist explainations).

Why is it that Catholics have liberty to disagree “within the one Church” on non-essentials but when Protestants have the SAME disagreement it’s proof of the divisions within Protestantism and proof that our theology (in this case YOUR theology as well) is flawed???
 
**Quote:
Originally Posted by backfrmthebrink
First funny how you are denying your own church’s prayers and doctrines. Holy mary mother of God (she was not the mother of God a very important use of words here) **

Do you pray that too? allright!

**St. Ambrose of Milan, The Sacraments, 4:4:14, 390AD
“You may perhaps say: “My bread is ordinary.” But that bread is bread before the words of the Sacraments; where the consecration has entered in, the bread becomes the Flesh of Christ.” **
 
as for the ab of catholic to cath or cc I have seen even the stanchiest of posters here do that as well. Sorry I will not and If they boot me then so be it. I do not give that cc respect given to my Lord. May God forgive you for your idolitry
You agreed to abide by the rules when you came on board here at CAF.

No one asked you to treat the church as Christ, but that in your disagreement you treat both catholics and their faith with common civility and respect.
You said Militant
Rhetorical bunkum! We have buried you in scripture and just because it does not agree with your pet interpretations you discount it.
I beg to differ! I and many others on this thread …(djrakowski for one very good example) have shown you again and again the scriptural basis for Catholic belief as contradicting your own interpretations…
You have never buired me in anything scripturally. You use only your own writings and then don’t even hold to them.
This is simply not true and every poster on this thread can see it. You lose even more credibility. 🤷
I factually give you a list of just a few things that the cc teaches in contradiction to scripture funny how you never see the facts.
Again, untrue. I have in fact dealt with most everything that you have offered, (especially as they are essentially the same parroted arguments, with more or less vitriol, that have been put forth and refuted for the last 500 years.) That’s where the blog articles come from and the majority of my posts here at CAF and other Catholic forums. I have obeyed the apostolic mandate to, “Carefully study to present thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.” (2nd Timothy 2:15) That’s where these beliefs came from. I don’t suppose that you noticed, did you, that St. Paul does not there tell St. Timothy to confine his studies to just the scriptures. Nah… guess not.
(Cont’d)
 
I suggest that you get a book “The Gospel According to Rome” study that.
:rotfl: I KNEW it! McCarthy’s book is well know to me and many of my fellow Catholics. If you had bothered to search these forums before diving in headlong you’d know that this man’s a-C book has been refuted. Perhaps you’ll also take the time to get and read, http://www.handsonapologetics.com/GOM AD 1.jpg
Furthermore, check all this out.
I suspect you do not have the courage though as it will lay out in easy to follow form what the Bible teaches and next to it what the cc teaches.
You suspect wrong. I’m well familiar with McCarthy. :rolleyes:
Should be easy for you to follow. If you want to learn the truth of what you have chosen death for.
Y’know, your remarks like that are really tiresome. I think I’ve wasted enough time one your propaganda. In obedience to scripture…“Mark 6:11 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you; going forth from thence, shake off the dust from your feet for a testimony to them.”
Good bye.
 
You fail to see alot. There are many books supposedly about the Reformation that are just plainly biased Catholic disdain for it. This appears to just be another of those.
Sir, the author of the book I am reading is a very serious Protestant. This book is written by a Protestant, a Protestant who seems to have no fear in telling the truth of how the reformation came to be. You immediately assume a Catholic Bias, a knee jerk reaction in ignorantce does you no favours.

If you actually read the book, you would see that the author spends an inordinate amount of time on Catholic scandal, Catholic corruption, Catholic error etc… I assure you,this book does not have a pro Catholic stance.

In September 2008, McGrath will take up the newly-established Chair of Theology, Ministry and Education in the Department of Education and Professional Studies at King’s College, London. He will serve as the academic leader of the Centre for Theology, Religion and Culture, and be involved in theological research and the professional development of clergy from a range of Christian denominations.

McGrath was born in Belfast, Northern Ireland and grew up in Downpatrick, County Down, where he attended Down High School. In September 1966 he became a pupil at the Methodist College Belfast, where his studies focused on mathematics, physics and chemistry. He went up to Wadham College, Oxford in 1971 and gained first class honours in chemistry in 1975. He began research in molecular biophysics in the Oxford University Department of Biochemistry under the supervision of Professor Sir George Radda, FRS and was elected to an E.P.A. Cephalosporin Research Studentship at Linacre College, Oxford, for the academic year 1975-6, and to a Domus Senior Scholarship at Merton College, Oxford, for the period 1976-8. During these three years, he carried out scientific research alongside studying for the Oxford University Final Honour School of Theology[1]. He was awarded an Oxford D.Phil. for his research in molecular biophysics (December 1977), and gained first class honours in Theology in June 1978.

McGrath then left Oxford to work at Cambridge University, where he also studied for ordination into the Church of England. In September 1980, he was ordained deacon, and began work as a curate at St Leonard’s Parish Church, Wollaton, Nottingham, in the English East Midlands. In 1983, he was appointed lecturer in Christian doctrine and ethics at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford, and a member of the Oxford University Faculty of Theology. McGrath spent the fall semester of 1990 as the Ezra Squire Tipple Visiting Professor of Historical Theology at the Divinity School of Drew University, Madison, New Jersey[1].
 
I have the book… many copies.

And I offer them to any non-Catholic who is interested in faulting the Catholic Church… if

If they will also take a copy of
The Gospel According to James McCarthy by Gary Michuta

and read them both. That is fair.

If you would promise to do the same, I will even send you a copy.

or…

you can go to this site and read them both at the same time…
bringyou.to/apologetics/a101.htm section I

bringyou.to/apologetics/a102.htm section II

bringyou.to/apologetics/a103.htm section III

bringyou.to/apologetics/a64.htm section IV

“Should be easy for you to follow. If you want to learn the truth of what you have chosen death for”

Then, after we have both listened to both sides, we can discuss.

So…I have accepted your challenge to read the book you suggest, now will you at least accept the challange I offer … and you don’t even have to buy the book.

May God give you the courage to do so.

.
I really do not understand how then you can hold up the cc. But in any event I would love to read your book.
 
estesbob;3913773:
Actually, belief in predestination predates Protestantism by about 1,000 years (check out Augustine’s writings). Your Church accepts pre-destination–it’s not a Protestant heresy.

The Thomists, the Augustinians, the majority of the Scotists and also individual older Molinists (Suarez, St. Bellarmine) teach an absolute Predestination (ad gloriam tantum), therefore ante praevisa merita. According to them, God freely resolves from all Eternity, without consideration of the merits of man’s grace, to call certain men to beatification and therefore to bestow on them graces which will infallibly secure the execution of the Divine Decree (ordo intentionis). In time God first gives to the predestined effective graces and then eternal bliss as a reward for the merits which flow from their free cooperation with grace (ordo executionis). The ordo intentionis and the ordo executionis are in inverse relation to each other (glory-grace; grace-glory).

Your argument that Protestantism is flawed because we have so many divisions ignores the fact that the major theories of predestination which (you imply) divide Protestantism are both contained and accepted within your Church (Thomist theories of salvation are accepted as are Molinist explainations).

Why is it that Catholics have liberty to disagree “within the one Church” on non-essentials but when Protestants have the SAME disagreement it’s proof of the divisions within Protestantism and proof that our theology (in this case YOUR theology as well) is flawed???
nice point
 
It appears that “back from” was on line until I posted my challenge.

I pray that he/she left to read the links I provided.

We shall see…
what challenge was that exactly. Don’t flatter yourself so much God hates pride. You have offered me nothing that is challengin yet. 😃
 
Really? (I deny no such thing…though you wish I did.) Then who was the mother of Jesus? This is a very old heresy answered way early in church history. (Something you’d know if you really bothered to study it.)

You name yourself “Protestant” and yet you deny the very teachings that the three “Pillars of the Reformation” preached about this very important topic. Read it and weep:That’s not mediation…that’s intercession, another thing altogether. I can’t recount to you how many time I have heard n-C preachers say from their pulpits during their “invitations”, “Just slip your hand up and back down so that we can pray for you…” It’s the same sort of intercession.This is just more rhetoric. I know that in my own life I have no great fear of death ***because of ***my faith. I long to face my Lord and and embrace His feet in praise and thanksgiving for the mercy He has given me and the terrible sacrifice that He endured for me.

I live every moment of every day in that hope of salvation. 1st Thessalonians 5:8 But let us, who are of the day, be sober, having on the breastplate of faith and charity, and for a helmet the hope of salvation

I have no doubt that most of my fellow Catholic brethren will express some similar hope and faith.Really? I think not! In fact, I can point to several statements you have made which do indeed fall under historically verifiable condemned heresies from even so far back as the first 3 centuries of Christianity.

In fact, I know no heretical beliefs in my life. I dumped them once I came to the realization that that is what they were as I compared them, their sources, and both the Word of God and authentic Catholic teaching.One cannot tell from your diatribes…This is about the only thing that I can agree with. Perhaps and God willing, as you do grow, you will see that your teachers and preachers have led you astray and deceived you. That is a hope that i hang my prayers for you upon.I could assert the same of you, but I won’t.Nice out of context reference there. I’m well familiar with that verse in St. Jude’s epistle, which actually reads as follows in context.[8] Yet in like manner these men in their dreamings defile the flesh, reject authority, and revile the glorious ones.
[9] But when the archangel Michael, contending with the devil, disputed about the body of Moses, he did not presume to pronounce a reviling judgment upon him, but said, “The Lord rebuke you.”
[10] But these men revile whatever they do not understand, and by those things that they know by instinct as irrational animals do, they are destroyed.
[11] Woe to them! For they walk in the way of Cain, and abandon themselves for the sake of gain to Balaam’s error, and perish in Korah’s rebellion.

Unfortunately for you, this citation applies to those who have embraced errors and heresies and departed from the Church that Christ founded. (Who do you suppose that might be? :whistle: Not the Catholic Church as it has been proven here…)

Worse still, this is a passage that proves that even the apostles set Sacred Tradition on a level with their own writings because this does not quote the Old Testament, but the non canonical Jewish traditional text of The Assumption of Moses. :eek: Yet you just quoted it as inspired and the Church accepted it as such along with the other 26 books of the NT canon.
Your responses are so far from truyth that I can’t even reply to them without a feeling of waisting my time. Your own chuch writers assign Mary to this position. Read “The Glories of Mary” written by Bishop Alphonse de Liguori. As for your other statements the 3 pillars of reformation. do not say anything that I disaggree on re Mary. She is the mother of Jesus and she is blessed. She is not the mother of God and she did not exist from eternity and she is not the gatekeeper of heaven and she is not an intecessor (nice attempt at a play on words though) You make statements that go directly against the doctrines of your church. You all know the lunacy you have assigned to Mary and she would rebuke you if she could. So you work ways to deny the crazyness of your own church beliefs.
Why are you all so ashamed of that doctrine that you deny what your church writers have so boldly stated?
 
btw those same writings were approved by James Cardinal Gibbons, Archbishop of Baltimore, 1931
 
intresting that the same reason your church tried to ban the Bible from anyone else to read has nothing to do with interpretation but what is going on now here. You have well learned men directly opposing the cc with accurate and Godly Biblical arguments and the cc loses power aqnd money.😉
 
intresting that the same reason your church tried to ban the Bible from anyone else to read has nothing to do with interpretation but what is going on now here. You have well learned men directly opposing the cc with accurate and Godly Biblical arguments and the cc loses power aqnd money.😉
Do you have evidence that supports your claim that “your church tried to ban the Bible from anyone else to read”? I don’t think you can produce any proof of that accusation, because it’s a flat-out lie (probably perpetuated by the likes of McCarthy and/or Boettner, paragons of truth, virtue, scholarship and Christian charity that they are :rolleyes: )

I was a ‘Bible-only’ evangelical Protestant for nearly a decade before I was received into the Catholic Church (in fact, I spent a significant portion of my time in such churches as a Bible teacher, teaching and believing many of the things I’ve seen you write in this thread), and my good friend and mentor Church Militant was an evangelical Protestant elder/deacon for far longer than that. We’re more than familiar with all of the supposed Biblical refutations of our most holy faith, mostly because we’ve used most of them in the past ourselves in mistaken efforts to draw Catholics away from their Church (and may God have mercy on our souls for those errant attempts). So we know that these so-called ‘learned’ men have done great violence to the Bible to justify their post-Reformation rejection of truths that had been accepted by just about everyone in Christendom for the 1500 years prior to Luther. So you’re not surprising anyone - because we’ve heard, seen, read and imbibed it all. So I suspect that your efforts to defeat Catholicism will, like many, many efforts by far more learned men before you have failed for the past 500 years.
 
She is not the mother of God
She’s not? :confused:
Luke 1:39-43 - And Mary rising up in those days, went into the hill country with haste into a city of Juda. And she entered into the house of Zachary, and saluted Elizabeth.
And it came to pass, that when Elizabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the infant leaped in her womb. And Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost: And she cried out with a loud voice, and said: Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
So Elizabeth witnesses to the fact that Mary is “the mother of my Lord.” And who is the Lord?
Luke 1:32 - He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the most High; and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of David his father; and he shall reign in the house of Jacob for ever.
John 10:30 - I and the Father are one.
OK, so Mary is the mother of the Lord (as witnessed in the greeting of Elizabeth, quoted above), and Jesus and His Father are one, and they are God. Therefore, Mary is the Mother of God. That’s simple logic, backed by scripture.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top