T
Trunicate09
Guest
Why does one assume that being homosexual is something that needs to be cured?If there was a pill to cure homosexuality what do you think would happen? And why?
Why does one assume that being homosexual is something that needs to be cured?If there was a pill to cure homosexuality what do you think would happen? And why?
Ugh thatâs just horrible.Pray for a cure or treatment for homosexuality.
Cured is not necessarily the right word. Mastered would be a better word. The desire to engage in same sex activity, as with any other extramarital sexual activity, needs to be mastered, because such activity is contrary to natural law and Godâs design for our lives and our bodies, regardless of the desireâs origin.Why does one assume that being homosexual is something that needs to be cured?
![]()
Hi Crumpy,I donât have time to watch the video right now.
I have become aware of the emerging science of the epigenome. This is an area of study about how genes are turned on and off and how their expression is modified.
That, in a nutshell, seems to be close to what the problem with same-sex attraction may be â an error or problem in the way sexuality is expressed and modified.
As that field develops, I believe a cure or treatment for homosexuality will be found. It is probably not far off.
Pray for a cure or treatment for homosexuality.
Buffalo,If there was a pill to cure homosexuality what do you think would happen? And why?
At the very least it needs to be overcome since it violates natural law.Why does one assume that being homosexual is something that needs to be cured?
![]()
Oh really.Buffalo,
A pill to âcureâ queer people⊠I hate to burst your bubble, but in my experience gay people are happy with who they are. Itâs judgmental people who need a pill to cure discriminatory mindsets.
Blessed be, Dousias
That is a lie. If it were true than any impulse we have is genetic and we have no control over our choices. This type of reasoning leads to not having to take responseablity for their actions. if it is genetic that every impuse is genetic it would be saying âI hade no choice I had to kill those people I was born this wayâ.The cause of homosexuality, bisexuality and heterosexuality is biological in origin - genetic, etc.
It has absolutely nothing to do with sin, possession, being raised by a strong or domineering mother, exposure to gay people, etc.
Dear Jpk,That is a lie. If it were true than any impulse we have is genetic and we have no control over our choices. This type of reasoning leads to not having to take responseablity for their actions. if it is genetic that every impuse is genetic it would be saying âI hade no choice I had to kill those people I was born this wayâ.
Yes Buffalo, you are being judgmental. Being judgmental is not a wrongness but in this case you and others are being very judgmental in a very negative way. Attraction just is and by itself cannot be a wrongness.Oh really.
So I am denied the right to judge behavior, but you are allowed to do so?
Are all congentital conditions ordered correctly simply because they occur in nature? Is that the standard?No it not a lie. We are talking about a hard-wired brain connection, not an impulse. And no, not all impulses are wrong. The assumption that SSA is the same as homicide is ludicrous.
See, it is not simply about âlikeâ and âdislikeâ. It is much deeper. It is about right and wrong.About responsibility⊠We are responsible to make life choices with the good of all in mind. We create a stable, happy and worthwhile society for all when we do so. Acceptance of issues not exactly to our liking is a part of responsible adulthood and that too helps our society.
Question. What would God say about SSA if She was sitting next to you? (She is because She is everywhere!) God is perfect and created perfect people. Period. I would love to sit alongside you two and listen in on how you came up with the idea that SSA is somehow going against His Grand Plan. " I read it in the Bible" you might say. Or, âI listen to what the Catholic Church says.â Hmmm, seems like âMans wordâ is now better than âGods word!â I like to think He would ask you to rethink your stance and consider what God would do and listen less to what people do.
A gentle reminder that Neale Donald Walshâs Conversations with God series is a great way to tap into an accurate concept of God energy.
How do you define health and disease? Are they arbitrary?Blessed be, Dousias
Please show me again how I was judgmental.Yes Buffalo, you are being judgmental. Being judgmental is not a wrongness but in this case you and others are being very judgmental in a very negative way. Attraction just is and by itself cannot be a wrongness.
Blessed be, Dousias
Ahhh Fix,Are all congentital conditions ordered correctly simply because they occur in nature? Is that the standard?
Yes it is. We are given âchoiceâ by our Creator to do as we please and are expected to make a better choice than a âbaserâ man might make. Our choices become our experience. That experience then melds with others to create a better world.See, it is not simply about âlikeâ and âdislikeâ. It is much deeper. It is about right and wrong.
Define context, please?How do you define health and disease? Are they arbitrary?
Hi Buffalo,Please show me again how I was judgmental.
A pill to âcureâ queer people⊠I hate to burst your bubble, but in my experience gay people are happy with who they are. Itâs judgmental people who need a pill to cure discriminatory mindsets.
Judgmental is defined as:Blessed be, Dousias
Hi again,At the very least it needs to be overcome since it violates natural law.
**Never Judge Anyone **?
As just stated above, error has no dignity except as a possible motivator to
lead us to truth. But if we are not confronted in our error, how can we be
motivated to move toward truth?
St. Paul instructs us to judge:
*I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus who is
to judge the living and the dead,⊠preach the word, be urgent in
season and out of season, convince, rebuke, and exhort, be
unfailing in patience and in teaching. For a time is coming when
people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears
they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own
likings, and will turn away from listening to the truth and
wander into myths.â2 Timothy 4:2-4 *
We are to judge the teaching of teachers, the opinions of people, the
attitudes and behaviors of people. If we donât, then we allow sin and Satan to
exploit the weak and ignorant and vulnerable with his lies.
We are to preach the Truth and rebuke those who assert errorânot in an
attitude of rock throwing or some sort of controlling self-righteousness, but
in a loving attitude of helping the person return to God (2 Timothy 4:2). We
are our brothersâ keepers (ref., Mark 12:31; Luke 10:25-37; Matthew 7:12;
18:23-35; Luke 6:31). We have a responsibility to warn and admonish our
brethren in the faith, just as we have a responsibility to our blood-brothers to
warn them when they go astray because we love them.
St. Paul to the Romans exhorted good Catholics to instruct one another
(Romans 15:14). To instruct someone necessarily means to evaluate
(another word for judge) the one to whom instruction is given.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states (No 1868): *"⊠we have a
responsibility for the sins committed by others when we cooperate in them:
by (among several actions on our part) not disclosing or not hindering them
when we have an obligation to do so." *
We cannot âdiscloseâ a sin without first assessing (yet another word for
judging) that the sin is in fact there in the first place.
In addition, one of the traditional seven Spiritual Works of Mercy is to
"Admonish the sinner."
Again, we cannot admonish that which we refuse to recognize in the sinner.
We must make an assessment (judgment) that the person is sinning and
thus âneedsâ admonishment.
All of this sometimes requires âtough loveâ.
Our model in this tough love is no less that Jesus Himself (who, contrary to
popular opinion was not a 60âs flower child with flowers in his hair repeating
a mantra of peace and love). Jesus preached a demanding love, a love so
demanding that in some cases it would rip apart families:
*âDo not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I
did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to
turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a
daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law â a manâs enemies
will be the members of his own household. Anyone who loves
his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone
who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of
me; and anyone who does not take his cross and follow me is
not worthy of me.ââMatthew 10:34-38 *
Truth cannot be compromisedâeven if it makes enemies of our relatives.
Some people will not accept the truth and will hate those who preach it.
Truth demands judgment; that is, truth demands we see things truthfully
and to call things what they are. If we see sin or error, we must call it for
what it is.
The Bible is filled with passages talking about how we are to judge others.
Before listing some of those, first let us look at the kind of judgment we are
not to do.
The most famous of the several âdo not judgeâ passages are found at
Matthew 7:1-3
Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you
pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get. Why do you see the speck that is in your brotherâs eye, but do not notice the log that is in your ownâŠ"
In this passage we see three kinds of judgment we are not to do:
Judgment in this passage is referring to condemning (âpronouncingâ
- Judgment of Condemnation:
judgment on a personâs soul). We are not the âJudgeâ to pronounce
condemnation on anyone (not even ourselves). Only God can do that.
The Church, for example, never pronounces âanyoneâ in hell. And even
in the assessment of a person declared a saint, it is done by special
dispensation granted to the Church by her authority of the âkeysâ. But
even with this authority, we need to note that it is never applied to
judging a person in hell. If the Church, who has the authority of the
keys will not judge a person to condemnation, how can we? We are
never to judge a personâs state of soul. Jesus tells us that we will
receive ourselves the judgment of soul that we place on others if we
attempt this usurpation of Godâs sovereignty.
When we use doubleâstandards for judgment, apply one measure to
- Judgment from DoubleâStandards:
others and a different measure to ourselves we commit a sin. Jesus
says that we will not get by with that (a form of hypocrisy). The
standards we apply to others will be applied to us as well.
The last sentence of the passage quoted refers to seeing sins in others
- Judgment from Self-Righteousness:
but not in oneself. This is self-righteousness (another form of
hypocrisy).
Part 2:
In this passage, Jesus does not say that we cannot judge. He says that we are not to judge in the manner of presuming condemnation on another or to make judgments borne from hypocrisy (double-standard & self- righteousness).
In verse 5 Jesus continues: You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you can see clearly to take the speck out of your brotherâs eye."
Taking the speck out of our brotherâs eye is not condemned in itself. Hypocritical judgment is what Jesus condemns.
We can immediately see this is the meaning of these passages by going on to the very next verse:
*Do not give dogs what is holy; and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under foot and turn to attack you. *
Dogs? Swine? How are we to know who is a dog or a swine? We cannot take Jesusâ advice, which is advice for self-protection (e.g. when Jesus said the swine will âturn to attack youâ), if we do not judge a person, that is, to identify a person as a metaphorical âdogâ or âswine.â
Who are the dogs and swine? Verse 15 gives us one clue when it talks about false prophets who come in sheepâs clothing. Verse 21 Jesus talks about people calling to him, âLord, Lordâ yet some of these will not enter heaven. They will not enter heaven because despite their calling upon the name of the Lord, they are people who refuse to do Godâs will.
Verse 26 tells us more about these people. They are people who do not just fail to follow Godâs will, but who actively disobey the teachings of Jesus and thus they build their house on sand (and that includes disobeying the Church, who has been given authority to speak infallibly and definitively in Jesusâ name to the faithfulâwhen the Church speaks, Jesus speaks).
Throughout Scripture we are given examples of these dogs and swine and are repeatedly told to shun them, to avoid them, and even to kick them out of our community as to give them up to Satan.
In Matthew 10:13-14 Jesus tells the disciples to shake the very dust off their clothes of any city that refuses to listen to them. That requires a judgment. St. Paul in Titus 3:9-11 tells us to warn a heretic (divisive person) twice and then have nothing more to do with him because such a person is âperverted and sinful; he is self-condemned.â We donât condemn him, he condemns himself, but we do judge him to be divisive beyond tolerance because we tried to admonish him (judge his behavior and warn him of his sin) twice but he would not repent.
St. Paul commands us in 1 Corinthians 5:9-13 to not associate with people calling themselves Christians who are âguilty of immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or robberânot even to eat with such a one.â Then Paul actually says and confirms in black and white language in verse 12 without any shades of gray that we are to judge our fellow Christians (but interestingly to not to judge those outside of the church): *âIs it not those inside the church whom you are to judge? God judges those outside.â *We are our brotherâs keeper and if we love, we will admonish a brother in sin
or error.
St. Paul also tells us in 2 Timothy 3:1-9 that we are to avoid people who are *âholding to a form of religion but denying the power of itâ *(e.g., liberals who strip our Church of its sacramental power). Other we are to avoid include those who are âLovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, inhuman, implacable, slanderers, profligates, fierce, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of GodâŠâ.
And finally, St. Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 5:1-5 that some people must be excommunicatedâcompletely removed from fellowship and handed over to Satan. Paul specifically says, *âI have already pronounced judgment in the name of the Lord Jesus on the man who has done such a thing⊠you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.â *
This form of judgment (excommunication), by the way, is one reserved to the Church and is not a personal judgment exacted by the faithful. Jesus, Himself, calls for this formal judgment on the part of the Church in Matthew 18:15-18.
As we have seen, the idea we are not to judge is a lie.
We cannot judge a personâs state of soul, of course. We cannot condemn him. We are also not to judge out of hypocrisy.
But we are to make proper judgments, borne out of love, to admonish a sinner in order to encourage him to repentance. That is the goal, to save the sinnerâs soul, to lead him to repentance.
We are to make judgments of behavior, attitudes, and ideas in order to protect our loved-ones and ourselves from danger. People who practice such dangerous and sinful behaviors, or have such dangerous attitudes and ideas, we are to avoid. We cannot avoid them until and unless a judgment has been made that such people are of the type the Bible tells us to avoid. The idea we are not to judge is a doctrine of demons.
Satan would love us to avoid making judgments. If he can convince us of this, sin can abound without criticism and we could continue in our sin without accountability and the philosophies of Satan can contaminate all of us with impunity unchecked and unchallenged.
Oh, how Satan loves those who think we are not to judge and those who think Jesus was a love-freak hippie from the 60âs.
Animals that only act in a homosexual way reproduce?Hi again,
The ânatural lawâ you speak of doesnât exist in the animal kingdom.
Blessed be, Dousias
Hi Buffalo,
Here is the post you reference:
Judgmental is defined as:
judgmental, judgemental [dÊÊdÊËmÉntÉl]
Huh - I judge wrongly but a supporter of the homosexual act judges correctly?
adj
of or denoting an attitude in which judgments about other peopleâs conduct are made
Collins English Dictionary â Complete and Unabridged 6th Edition 2003. © William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003
By Collins definition, people who âjudgeâ others are being âjudgmental.â
It would appear you qualify! (As do we all!)
The problem is when we âjudgeâ wrongly.
Blessed be, Dousias