Cause of homosexuality

  • Thread starter Thread starter jpk1313
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Religions do not produce moral people? Do you have some evidence of this claim?
Hi Buffalo,

I wrote:

"3- That is good there is somewhere you can put your trust and find your moral rudder. But religions do not produce highly moral people. We would like to think they do but the truth is they are no better or worse then the population as a whole. If churchgoers have high morals then why is confession so popular? As to the last part, I too trust the teachings of Jesus.

Your reply to this statement implies religions do not produce moral people. My statement clearly reads “…they are no better or worse than the population as a whole.”

It would be nice if all people acted in a perfectly moral way, but that is not the way it really is.

Blessed be, Dousias
 
Hi Buffalo,

I wrote:

"3- That is good there is somewhere you can put your trust and find your moral rudder. But religions do not produce highly moral people. We would like to think they do but the truth is they are no better or worse then the population as a whole. If churchgoers have high morals then why is confession so popular? As to the last part, I too trust the teachings of Jesus.

Your reply to this statement implies religions do not produce moral people. My statement clearly reads “…they are no better or worse than the population as a whole.”

It would be nice if all people acted in a perfectly moral way, but that is not the way it really is.

Blessed be, Dousias
and I asked for evidence.
 
1- First, could you please cite a couple of non-religious people that could be compared to the hundreds of Saints that the Catholic Church looks to as examples of how to live.

2- Second, you seem to be saying that a person with high morals would no longer be a sinner. This is not true. It is exactly because of my high morals that I go to confession. For example, when I look at a woman with lust, I know that is a sin, I immediately try to divert my attention to God or the Blessed Mother, and I then confess this sin when I go to confession. Were I not to do this, 2a- I would probably continue to think impure thoughts, which may eventually lead to me acting on my thoughts, which in my case would be adultery. So for me, I go to confession because I have high morals, not be cause I lack them.

3- Third, your statement that “Religious people are no better or worse than the population as a whole” seems limited to me. If you are talking about the United States of America, then unfortunately, you are probably correct. Although, even as short as 50 years ago, the USA was a Christian nation that still headed God’s word. 3a- Today, religious people are inundated with non-Christian values by the mass media. 3b- Sadly there are Christians in the USA who are hypocrites, but simply because some are, is not evidence that religion has no effect on morals. It would be like me saying that Antibiotics have no effect on bacteria based on my observation of people who do not take them as prescribed.

4- I think the world really needs to think about that statement, that “Religious people are no better or worse than the population as a whole” in regards to morals. I could easily imagine trying to teach my children that stealing is wrong and them saying to me, “But why?” And me saying, “Well because it is” or “How would you feel if someone stole from you” or “Because if you do you will go to jail” but all these answers are really not sufficient.

5- Ultimately, stealing (or any sin) is wrong because it goes against God, and to disobey God will lead to a life in Hell. Any other reason just doesn’t have weight.
Hi Chess,

Here we go…

1- What is a Saint? Someone closer to God than you or I? Somehow better? How is Sainthood determined? Can we all be Saints if conditions warrant?

2- I don’t believe “sin” exists. Not original sin or venial or even mortal sin. The real, actual definition for “sin” means to “miss the mark.” That’s all. Religions have perverted that simple concept and used it as a tool to control the masses. Think about it: If a say everybody is “bad” or “wrong” and I have a path to salvation then I have power over them. If I say we are all born perfect and pure, then I have empowered THEM to make their lives in the image of God or Jesus.

The teaching on point #2 is this: “What we resist, persists.” Talk about purity and self responsibility and empowerment and that WILL be your experience. Live a life believing you are a worthless sinner and that thought will become your experience.

2a- I don’t get this at all. Because you feel excited seeing a pretty girl you feel an overwhelming “wrongness” and to cure that feeling you go to a guy and confess. Dude, you are an adult male. You are SUPPOSED to feel excited in the presence of an attractive girl! That is how this race perpetuates itself!

3- I’m speaking in broad terms. “Fifty years ago the U.S. was heeding God’s word more than today.” Oh hogwash! Prove THAT stat! Religiosity varies over time and location. Man has been on the planet and self conscious for what, 2.4 million years? If we average religiosity over that span, we would probably find that the average in total would be about the same as it is found presently, worldwide. That means that most likely, today’s average would be about the same as a million years ago. Or a thousand years ago… Or a thousand years from now. That would be an averaged number that allows for statistical deviation. Ebb and flow over time. Understanding that process is important to understanding both things we see today and things lost to history. Think about what that means! Unless someone can document otherwise, allowing for statistical deviation, that that we experience today does not differ in any great degree than that experienced anytime in the past.

3b- And so too are religionists using the media.

3b- I never said religions don’t stress morality as a good path. They do! But the members who go to church seem to be about as moral as people who don’t.

4- It would be nice to think religious people are more moral than non-religious people because that gives the church purpose.

5- No, stealing is wrong because it harms man, not God. It is intrinsically wrong. No religion is needed to see that is truth. See, us Pantheists see God as unity, and that unity is us. When we steal from someone, we have stolen from ourselves. When we kill for protection, or for food, or for pleasure, we have taken from ourselves. When someone has done this they have taken a part of us. When someone steals from any other person, or kills another person or animal they have stolen or killed a part of us.

When someone, or some people, or all people realize that we are one, and that acts against anyone else is an act against us, than morality becomes something more that a lip-service item.

Blessed be, Dousias
 
You wrote a lot, but I will try to address it all.

Before I begin though, I have to admit that I do not know much about Pantheism, so if my assumptions or beliefs are incorrect, they are done by ignorance, not with maligned intent.

From what I have read, Pantheism is the belief that God is everything and everything is God. Water, dirt, air, birds, bees, humans are all part or God. Their is no one single Deity that is God, but everything makes up God. (Is this fair, or right to say?)
Hi Chess,

Here we go…

1- What is a Saint? Someone closer to God than you or I? Somehow better? How is Sainthood determined? Can we all be Saints if conditions warrant?
A general definition of Saint would be someone that is close to God. I think we would need to discuss the next part on Sin to actually understand what a Saint is.
2- I don’t believe “sin” exists. Not original sin or venial or even mortal sin. The real, actual definition for “sin” means to “miss the mark.” That’s all. Religions have perverted that simple concept and used it as a tool to control the masses.
Sin is just another word for doing Evil. Evil is the opposite of Good. God is good, doing God’s will is Good. God did not “create” Evil, it is just that Evil is a product of not doing Good. So, to say that when I do not do God’s will, I have “missed the mark”, works for me.

Here is my ignorance on Pantheism. If their is no sin, is their Good and Evil? Or if everything is God, then everything we do must be okay? Where do ethics fit in or come from?

“All pantheism must ultimately be shipwrecked on the inescapable demands of ethics, and then on the evil and suffering of the world. If the world is a theophany, then everything done by man, and even by animal, is equally divine and excellent; nothing can be more censurable and nothing more praiseworthy than anything else; hence there is no ethics.” -Schopenhauer The World as Will and Representation, Vol. II, Ch. XLVII
2a- I don’t get this at all. Because you feel excited seeing a pretty girl you feel an overwhelming “wrongness” and to cure that feeling you go to a guy and confess. Dude, you are an adult male. You are SUPPOSED to feel excited in the presence of an attractive girl! That is how this race perpetuates itself!
I suppose I should have distinguished between looking at girl and admiring her beauty OR looking at a girl and wanting to have sex (or anything physical) with. The latter is degrading, it is viewing a person as merely a means to an ends. There is no way for me to explain the meaning of sex as created by God, but John Paul II’s Theology of the Body or the book in my signature would explain it.
3- I’m speaking in broad terms. “Fifty years ago the U.S. was heeding God’s word more than today.” Oh hogwash! Prove THAT stat! Religiosity varies over time and location. Man has been on the planet and self conscious for what, 2.4 million years? If we average religiosity over that span, we would probably find that the average in total would be about the same as it is found presently, worldwide.
What I was thinking about was sex, marriage, contraception, and abortion (just to name a few differences from 1960 to 2010). I do not think it is “hogwash”, it is clearly evident that people have abandoned the teachings of Christ in these areas and society is now suffering the consequence. I am not sure what a Pantheist believes on these issues but it seems clear to me that:

a. Marriage is important to society. Children being raised by single parents are at a disadvantage that those with two parents. (I am thinking of a mother and father)

b. Sex has been completely objectified. It is now normal for people to say that they want to have sex before they are married to be sure it will “good”. Unfortunately, their is so much more to sex than just the physical side.

c. Contraception and Abortion can be discussed together because some contraception (the pill) cause abortions. I am not sure what you believe, but if you go ask any medical doctor when life begins, I am sure they will say at conception. How can it be otherwise? Murdering babies is clearly not what God wants. Did abortions happen before Roe v. Wade? Sure they did. But since 1973, the USA has killed more than 45 million babies by legal abortions. Source

As for your comment about “average religiosity” and that it would be the same worldwide, I say HOGWASH 😛 Can you in anyway back that up? Also, averages do not really matter. I could have you stand with one foot in a bucket of ice cold water, and your other foot in a bucket of boiling water, and say on average you are standing in warm water, but I think you would disagree.

What would matter more to me is who the ‘world’ has acted since God revealed himself to us. We could go back to Moses, Abraham, or since Christ, would not matter to me, but it is my belief that the ‘world’ is a better place because of the Decalogue or when Christ appeared and founded His Church.

cont…
 
cont…
3b- I never said religions don’t stress morality as a good path. They do! But the members who go to church seem to be about as moral as people who don’t.
4- It would be nice to think religious people are more moral than non-religious people because that gives the church purpose.
Seem to be as moral, and I sure there are a lot of “religious” people that are less moral than some people who do not go to church. But my original point was about what you said, that “Religious people are no better or worse than the population as a whole” in regards to morals. My point was that religion does produce some people that are of high moral caliber. I then asked for some examples of non-religious people that could be compared with Saints for example. Saints are known people that lived truly exceptional lives, although there are many more religious people whose lives could be compared to that of the Saints, but to be called a Saint their must be miracles that happen after the Saint has died. You can read more about how people become Saints here
5- No, stealing is wrong because it harms man, not God. It is intrinsically wrong. No religion is needed to see that is truth. See, us Pantheists see God as unity, and that unity is us. When we steal from someone, we have stolen from ourselves. When we kill for protection, or for food, or for pleasure, we have taken from ourselves. When someone has done this they have taken a part of us. When someone steals from any other person, or kills another person or animal they have stolen or killed a part of us.
When someone, or some people, or all people realize that we are one, and that acts against anyone else is an act against us, than morality becomes something more that a lip-service item.
Blessed be, Dousias
But where does this morality come from? Common sense?
Why is Human Life thought to be so special? Or is nature also part of the Unity?

It seems to me that if God did not will everything into existence, but instead everything just happened randomly and therefore everything is connected (unified), human life would be no more important that the life of a cow. We are both just animals, that happened to evolve. Yet if we are just animals, then why is your life even equal to mine? If you have something I want, why should I just not take it? Maybe you can shed some light on why Pantheists believe what they do.
 
My statement clearly reads “…they are no better or worse than the population as a whole.”
Thank you,

You are seeking evidence that religions can or do produce immoral people. And that non-religious people can be immoral people too.

It is a given that both groups produce moral and immoral people. Such is human nature. I didn’t cite a number one way or the other in my statement. Any number would be at best a guess. The number then becomes irrelevant to our discussion.

Evidence 1: kesq.com/Global/story.asp?S=11754219
Title is: “Catholic Bishop pleads not guilty to selling drugs.”

And…: cbs2.com/local/Corona.Bishop.Arrested.2.1397843.html

Is that the type of evidence you are asking for Buffalo?

Blessed be, Dousias

Note to moderator: Mr. Buffalo asked me to provide some evidence of religious immorality and these two stories popped up first. My relating them to Mr. Buffalo is not meant as a slam on Catholicism.
 
T
Note to moderator: Mr. Buffalo asked me to provide some evidence of religious immorality and these two stories popped up first. My relating them to Mr. Buffalo is not meant as a slam on Catholicism.
Have a look at fetidfruit.com/

Christian Youth Program Director Sentenced for Sexual Assault of Girl
  • Wednesday, January 06, 2010
Episcopalian Sentenced for Sexual Abuse of a Child
  • Wednesday, January 06, 2010
Pastor Convicted of Fraud
  • Tuesday, January 05, 2010
Priest Pleads Guilty to Possessing/Selling Drugs
  • Tuesday, January 05, 2010
Catholic Archbishop Convicted of Sex Abuse
  • Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Baptist Youth Group Leader Sentenced for Sex with 15-year-old Girl
  • Thursday, December 24, 2009
Lutheran Church President Sentenced for Fraud
  • Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Catholic Priest Sentenced for Theft from Church
  • Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Methodist Pastor Sentenced For Theft
  • Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Rabbi Sentenced for Money Laundering & Tax Fraud
  • Monday, December 21, 2009
Methodist Youth Pastor Convicted of Sexual Assault
  • Monday, December 21, 2009
Pastor Guilty of Sexual Assault of Teen Girl
  • Saturday, December 19, 2009
Baptist Deacon Sentenced for Bank Robbery
  • Friday, December 18, 2009
Rabbi Convicted of Drug Possession
  • Thursday, December 17, 2009
Self Proclaimed Prophet Convicted of Stalking
  • Thursday, December 17, 2009
Irish Catholic Priest Sentenced for Sexual Assault
  • Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Pastor Sentenced for Murder of Wife
  • Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Catholic Priest Sentenced for Sex With Teen Boy
  • Monday, December 14, 2009
Pastor Admits Fathering Child With Teen Girl
  • Friday, December 11, 2009
Baptist Youth Advisor Pleads Guilty to Sexual Assault
  • Friday, December 11, 2009
Baptist Pastor Convicted of $10,000 Theft
  • Friday, December 11, 2009
Christian Minister Sentenced for Child Pornography
  • Friday, December 11, 2009
Muslim Sentenced for Sexual Abuse of Young Girl
  • Friday, December 11, 2009
Methodist Youth Director Sentenced for $14,000 Theft
  • Thursday, December 10, 2009
Pentecostal Church Choir Director Sentenced for Attempted Rape
  • Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Christian Pastor Sentenced for Rape Video
  • Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Youth Minister Sentenced for Child Pornography
  • Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Baptist Deacon Pleads Guilty to Sexual Misconduct w/ Child
  • Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Police Officer Pleads Guilty to Accepting $50,000 Bribe from Catholic Church
  • Saturday, December 05, 2009
That’s a month’s worth. I omitted the various devout Christians, Muslims etc, and the cases where negligence or conscience was involved in the crime. Such as a minister breaking in to an airbase to damage military equipment, or the drunken baptist school bus driver.

All isolated and unrepresentative incidents I’m sure… I do wonder though… there can’t be that many priests, rabbis, pastors etc around.

Personally, I just see this as evidence of human frailty. But the next time someone calls me “immoral by definition” because I don’t have faith that there is a God, I’ll try not to mock. It would be uncharitable.

A far better disproof would be to live by example. To try to be a good person, even though I’m only human too.

Zoe
 
We know that everyone sins, even the Pope. But that is not the point.

The statement was made that Religion does not produce people that have Higher Morals than the general public.

This is the statement that I find erroneous and unfounded. A simple look at history will show many religious people that are examples of how the general public should try and be.

Now if you can find religious people that are examples of the Least Moral in history, then we can start to argue if these two, in effect, cancel each other out, but I do not think you will be able to find anyone worse than Hitler or Stalin.
 
Hi Chessman.

You have a good grasp of the concept. Pantheism covers a lot of ground, kind of like when someone identifies as “poly.” Could mean a range of concepts and actions. I am no expert in any theology or philosophy, just a traveler on paths that work well for me.

I’ll drop the quote boxes and answer under some x’s.

Before I begin though, I have to admit that I do not know much about Pantheism, so if my assumptions or beliefs are incorrect, they are done by ignorance, not with maligned intent.
XX

That’s a good way to start.

From what I have read, Pantheism is the belief that God is everything and everything is Snip
Xx

That’s a fair statement. Monism is the term used to describe the concept. If one considers where our soul exists then the concept of oneness becomes clearer. Is your soul in your heart, or head or maybe in your big toe? Yes, your soul does reside within you, but the soul is infinite and thus exists in all dimensions and across time as well. That means your soul is everywhere. What about all those other souls, an infinite number
to be sure, occupying the same time-space continuum? That space and time is occupied by an infinite and eternal God too. Just as the air in your living room is the same air as in your hallway, souls truly are one! And they are one with God. We are soul-energy existing on a particular physical plane at a fixed time and living within a body. We are no less a part of the God experience now then we will be after we pass from this plane. So does the statement: “Thou art God” make sense?

A general definition of Saint would be someone that is close to God. I think we would need to discuss the next part on Sin to actually understand what a Saint is.

Sin is just another word for doing Evil. Evil is the opposite of Good. God is good, doing God’s will is Good. God did not “create” Evil, it is just that Evil is a product of not doing Good. So, to say that when I do not do God’s will, I have “missed the mark”, works for me.
XX

Okay, but let’s use terms like good and bad. Evil seems a lot more bad than it has to be. Jeffery Dahlmer (sp) was evil, whereas Tiger Woods was bad. But good and bad are relative.

Here is my ignorance on Pantheism. If their is no sin, is their Good and Evil? Or if everything is God, then everything we do must be okay? Where do ethics fit in or come from?
XX

It’s the definition of sin that bothers people. Too many things in life are labeled with a simple concept like: “This is bad and that is good.” Then we are expected to follow along and feel whatever it is that is sinful for another is also sinful for you. Life doesn’t work like that. The problem becomes worse when these made up sins conflict with reality. We see a situation that we find acceptable from a personal standpoint, let’s say gay sex, yet our church says that is a sin. If we believe the church, we get conflicted with what we experience. See why sin is an almost irrelevant term? Now we are not talking about Right and Wrong. That is a different concept. The Golden Rule is as good as any guideline I can think of!

"All pantheism must ultimately be shipwrecked on the inescapable demands of ethics, asnip
XX

What a sack of booya. Schopenhauer assumes Pantheism is a specific philosophy and creates a statement filled with absolutes and foregone conclusions. I think what we call Pantheism today and what they called it back in the 19th century is not the same.

I suppose I should have distinguished between looking at girl and admiring her beauty OR snip
XXX

It’s okay to admire beauty but wrong to feel a physical reaction? I am at a loss as to why some people think that is wrong. You (and I) are designed to do that! By God even!

What I was thinking about was sex, marriage, contraception, and abortion (just to name a snip

a. Marriage is important to society. Children being raised by single parents are at a disadvantage that those with two parents. (I am thinking of a mother and father)
XX

Yes, it’s a good thing.

b. Sex has been completely objectified. It is now normal for people to say that they want to have sex before they are married to be sure it will “good”. Unfortunately, their is so much more to sex than just the physical side.
XXXX

Sure, but sex can be just a physical thing too. Make it spiritual and deep or shallow and needful. Make it whatever you wish. Who is making rules on sex these days? Why would they? To control people’s lives, that’s why.

c. Contraception and Abortion can be discussed together because some contraception snip
XXX

No argument abortion is a problem. In a perfect world abstinence would actually be effective and all birth control methods would work 100% of the time. But they don’t and the only options available are abortion or adoption. Oh, there are other ways to take care of that problem that are pretty wrong too. We won’t go there.

As for your comment about “average religiosity” and that it would be the same worldwide, snip
XXXX

Averages do matter! It is a way to give a best-guess answer to data that is not otherwise available. By averaging we can say with reasonable certainty something is true.

What would matter more to me is who the ‘world’ has acted since God revealed himself to snip
XXX

A better place. Since we only have a few recent histories for the 2.4 million years man has been upright and thinking about how to chip stones into Crescent wrenches, I find saying the world is better or worse off a little tough to swallow.

Blessed be, Dousias
 
1- What is a Saint?
A Christian, one who has accepted the Gift of Salvation and free from the penalty of sin which is death & wrath and separation from God of the Christian faith.
2a I don’t believe sin exists.
Some don’t believe gravity exists, but jump off a 50 story building and for a short moment you will then believe gravity exists. Reject Jesus Christ and one day you will understand what separation from God means. Sin: transgression against Gods perfect moral standard.
**The teaching on point #2 is this: “What we resist, persists.” Talk about purity and self responsibility and empowerment and that WILL be your experience. Live a life believing you are a worthless sinner and that thought will become your experience. **
You do not understand the power of God in salvation, which is referred to as “peace”, “entering into God’s rest” and “joy”, which is all true and based on the moral standard of perfection, you are a worthless sinner in the eyes of God, but this is why God sent Jesus to punish Jesus instaed of the sinner; count it as all joy for the Christian. 🙂
2a- I don’t get this at all. Because you feel excited seeing a pretty girl you feel an overwhelming “wrongness” and to cure that feeling you go to a guy and confess. Dude, you are an adult male. You are SUPPOSED to feel excited in the presence of an attractive girl! That is how this race perpetuates itself!
Remain pure and marry that pretty woman and remain faithful, then you are doing the will of God resulting in the avoidance of disease and other problems that come with immoral behavior by Gods perfect standard.
3- I’m speaking in broad terms. “Fifty years ago the U.S. was heeding God’s word more than today.” Oh hogwash! Prove THAT stat! Religiosity varies over time and location. Man has been on the planet and self conscious for what, 2.4 million years? EDIT That means that most likely, today’s average would be about the same as a million years ago. Or a thousand years ago… Or a thousand years from now. That would be an averaged number that allows for statistical deviation. Ebb and flow over time. Understanding that process is important to understanding both things we see today and things lost to history. Think about what that means! Unless someone can document otherwise, allowing for statistical deviation, that that we experience today does not differ in any great degree than that experienced anytime in the past.
You are saying something is Hogwash; then proceed with something yourself made up??? :o The majority of the founding fathers of the US were practicing Christians and people like Jefferson had high regard for the moral standards based on God’s word. No other nation has been blessed in such a manner as this nation and as time moves along we will go the way of all nations that have turned their back on God, which you can read in Romans 1 and beginning of 2. You also should realize that if humans were around a million years ago, the population would be unsustainable and that based on population models that account for famine, disease and natural catastrophes, the current populations accord with the Bible creation account which makes the earth and man between 6-10k years old
CUT
**3b- I never said religions don’t stress morality as a good path. They do! But the members who go to church seem to be about as moral as people who don’t. **
According to the Bible most religious people who claim to be Christians, in fact, are not; therefore they are part of the world and not of God. Furthermore, all Christians still sin, but the pattern and direction is less and less and I’m sure you have encountered 2-3 people who called themselves Christians and actually are and lived it out.
** 4- It would be nice to think religious people are more moral than non-religious people because that gives the church purpose.**
Religious, non Christians, are men/women at their worst, not the best due to the high degree of hypocrisy.
5- No, stealing is wrong because it harms man, not God. It is intrinsically wrong. No religion is needed to see that is truth. CUT
God is ticked when a person violates His moral standard and the person stores up wrath for the day of judgment. God is the one who implants the conscience and general moral standard in the hearts of men. Romans 1 & 2. The law or 10 commandments is to show man two things 1) He cannot obtain the righteous moral standard God demands AKA: you are a sinner and 2) You need a substitute who can and has meet the standard; His name is Jesus.
When someone, or some people, or all people realize that we are one, and that acts against anyone else is an act against us, than morality becomes something more that a lip-service item.
Blessed be, Dousias
Sounds like the cyborg on Star-Trek, the last sentence. I would be interested in taking you theology and putting to the nth degree to see where it actually leads. For example, when we cut grass or waste food or cut trees for toilet paper etc, how that all effects the one and the us.
 
Reject Jesus Christ and one day you will understand what separation from God means. Sin: transgression against Gods perfect moral standard.
+++++++++++++++++

I do understand what separation from God means. Some have no understanding of Spirit or God at all. In fact some refuse to accept the concept of God on any level, to any degree. Those people, just like spiritual people like you or me, can and do lead highly happy, moral and fulfilled lives. If we accept the concept of an anthropomorphic God as defined by religionists, one who is vengeful, wrathful and seeking of our worship, then woe to all who cross him! Is that the true nature of a supreme being? More like that of a spoiled child or cranky old man? But that is not the case when we understand our relationship with God. God just is. The God-force we experience, the same experience felt from the time we started chipping tools from stone, is something we desire communion with. Some get along fine without that feeling of communion.

God has yet to explain “perfect moral standard.” As history has taught, morality shifts with the tide. Now the Church defines a lot of situations that other churches don’t consider “sins.” In the real world morality is fluid. We have standards to uphold but they are rarely absolute in nature. Pick up a dime from the street and put it in your pocket. Find a bag with a thousand dollars and you turn it over to the police. Would that person be moral enough? Or should he have turned in the dime too? Absolute morality would say yes. Practical morality says no. Find two discarded drink cans and turn them in and pocket two nickles. Turn those drink containers over to the police? Absolute morality says yes. Here’s one more: Kill a man in anger. Kill a man in war. Kill an ant for pleasure. Kill an ant to control vermin. The Bible clearly states: Thou Shall not Kill. (One of the best concepts for a happy life!) Where is that Perfect Moral Standard?

You also should realize that if humans were around a million years ago, the population would be unsustainable and that based on population models that account for famine, disease and natural catastrophes, the current populations accord with the Bible creation account which makes the earth and man between 6-10k years old
+++++++++++++++

Actually, man was involved in the process as early as seven million years ago. 2.4 million years for what is considered “modern” man. Really!

The Earth is 4.55 billion years old, plus or minus 1%. About the same as the solar system. Really!

The universe is 13.7 billion years old, plus or minus .2 billion years.

The Bible says one thing and a thousand experts in multiple disciplines say another. One was written with two thousand year old data, the best available, and the other by independently proven data from incredibly precise scientific sources.

In spite of those facts, people still cling to the ancient myth as if their lives depended on it! I’m sure you do too, so if that is what you choose to believe then so be it.

My Spirituality sees God and present cosmology as perfectly compatible. There is a wholeness, a connection between God and the physical world that just shouts: PERFECTION!

According to the Bible most religious people who claim to be Christians, in fact, are not; therefore they are part of the world and not of God.
+++++++++++

Agreed! And they are not being hypocrites, they are just being human. We do pick and choose what we believe.

Sounds like the cyborg on Star-Trek, the last sentence. I would be interested in taking you theology and putting to the nth degree to see where it actually leads. For example, when we cut grass or waste food or cut trees for toilet paper etc, how that all effects the one and the us.
+++++++++++++++

Religionists are in lock-step with the Borg. Free-thinkers are pulling the Borg’s fuses and clipping leads to the masses!

That is yet another discussion… All acts we do, even just thinking about something, has unknown effects somewhere else. I’m sure that is true. To what extent, who knows.

Been fun talking with you, Blessed be, Dousias
 
You also should realize that if humans were around a million years ago, the population would be unsustainable and that based on population models that account for famine, disease and natural catastrophes, the current populations accord with the Bible creation account which makes the earth and man between 6-10k years old.
++++++++++++++++++++++++

Opps, forgot this line!

For much of man’s early span of existence, his population was really stable. They say the birth rate was low due to the limited number of years a women could conceive coupled with high mortality rates.

Dousias
 
Reject Jesus Christ and one day you will understand what separation from God means. Sin: transgression against Gods perfect moral standard.
+++++++++++++++++

I do understand what separation from God means. Some have no understanding of Spirit or God at all. In fact some refuse to accept the concept of God on any level, to any degree. Those people, just like spiritual people like you or me, can and do lead highly happy, moral and fulfilled lives. If we accept the concept of an anthropomorphic God as defined by religionists, one who is vengeful, wrathful and seeking of our worship, then woe to all who cross him! Is that the true nature of a supreme being? More like that of a spoiled child or cranky old man? But that is not the case when we understand our relationship with God. God just is. The God-force we experience, the same experience felt from the time we started chipping tools from stone, is something we desire communion with. Some get along fine without that feeling of communion.
He tells us how to have communion with Him. Do you reject Jesus Christ as God who became flesh and dwelt among us?
God has yet to explain “perfect moral standard.” As history has taught, morality shifts with the tide. Now the Church defines a lot of situations that other churches don’t consider “sins.” In the real world morality is fluid. We have standards to uphold but they are rarely absolute in nature. Pick up a dime from the street and put it in your pocket. Find a bag with a thousand dollars and you turn it over to the police. Absolute morality would say yes. Practical morality says no. Find two discarded drink cans and turn them in and pocket two nickles. Turn those drink containers over to the police? Absolute morality says yes. Here’s one more: The Bible clearly states: Thou Shall not Kill. (One of the best concepts for a happy life!) Where is that Perfect Moral Standard?
He has given a moral standard summed up by Jesus in two commandments; no human can live to the standard, which is why we need the Savior. Your analogy of the bag of many verus the dime is poor in my opinion because God gave us common sense. The bag of money most likely came from a bank and has identification, the dime could have come from anywhere and anybody and will not having a negative effect on whoever lost it just like the finder will have next to no benefit unlike the person or bank that is missing a thousand. Just as if my child walked out of the store with a $0.50 pack of gum. I know where it came from and even though it would have a minimal effect on the business owner, we will go back and return it or buy it because of the principal of not stealing. On killing, it says thou shall not murder in relation to human beings made in the image of God. Stepping on an ant or swatting a fly; I am not convicted in my conscience which He gave to guide us.
Actually, man was involved in the process as early as seven million years ago. 2.4 million years for what is considered “modern” man. Really!
The Earth is 4.55 billion years old, plus or minus 1%. About the same as the solar system. Really!
The universe is 13.7 billion years old, plus or minus .2 billion years.
The Bible says one thing and a thousand experts in multiple disciplines say another. One was written with two thousand year old data, the best available, and the other by independently proven data from incredibly precise scientific sources.
The wisdom of men is foolishness to God. God said things occurr because of catastrophe, not uniformity. Creation would fall into this category and just as God built time into His creation, which means adam and eve were not born or raised as an infants; likewise the entire universe was built with time, such as light from stars shining, trees bering fruit immediately et al. this is why man id fooled by the age of the earth, they don’t understand the nature of God and His creation. Add the global flood and what would that do to giving an appearance of time knowing the pressure that water has at just 3500 feet, which would crush a person. Add earth quakes, volcanoes and the like. How many time has science changed the age of something and with no way of measuring with accuracy tens of thousands of years much less millions without a lot of presumptions, which is why it is not re-creatable, nor observable, which means it is guesswork and not science.
According to the Bible most religious people who claim to be Christians, in fact, are not; therefore they are part of the world and not of God.
+++++++++++
Agreed! And they are not being hypocrites, they are just being human. We do pick and choose what we believe.
All humans are hypocrites, it is only a matter of degree.
Religionists are in lock-step with the Borg. Free-thinkers are pulling the Borg’s fuses and clipping leads to the masses!
“Free thinkers” is a nice sounding title with a form of godliness and a dash of humanist, but nevertheless is a human philosophy, which is like chaff before God and will be burned up. Everyone who does not trust in Christ Jesus for their freedom from sin and judgment will perish; being separated from God in this life and the next. May Christ open hearts and eyes throughout these forums to those who do not have a personal relationship with Jesus, the God-man.

This is off topic, so I am moving on, my only comment on homosexuality is see what God did to the sodomites in Sodom for the error of fornication and repent of the lifestyle and live for Christ.
 
What i’m trying to get across is that they are drawn to god without knowing it and this love they do not understand is changed into sexual feelings.the end of all actions and feeling is happiness and god is the perfection of all happiness. so the unconcious desire for god inherent in all human beings can be corrupted into these feelings. Since they do not know god they transfer this desire onto others.
As a homosexual man I will tell you this is completely…COMPLETELY inaccurate. We “don’t know God”? Pardon my bluntness but who do you think you are? Have you even polled Christian homosexuals on this to get a real empirical theory going or are you just being creative?

Do you have any theological or psychological background to be even theorizing on this?
 
He tells us how to have communion with Him. Do you reject Jesus Christ as God who became flesh and dwelt among us?
++++++++++++++++++

What the Bible was saying, actually the human writers of the Bible, is that Jesus was God-spirit and a Master. Do you think he was the only one? Might there have been more? I believe that is so.

He has given a moral standard summed up by Jesus in two commandments; no human can live to the standard, which is why we need the Savior. Your analogy of the bag of many verus the dime is poor in my opinion because God gave us common sense. The bag of money most likely came from a bank and has identification, the dime could have come from anywhere and anybody and will not having a negative effect on whoever lost it just like the finder will have next to no benefit unlike the person or bank that is missing a thousand. Just as if my child walked out of the store with a $0.50 pack of gum. I know where it came from and even though it would have a minimal effect on the business owner, we will go back and return it or buy it because of the principal of not stealing. On killing, it says thou shall not murder in relation to human beings made in the image of God. Stepping on an ant or swatting a fly; I am not convicted in my conscience which He gave to guide us.
+++++++++++++++

You get my point. We use common sense instead of absolutes. But what if absolute morality is what God desires? What if it’s required? I don’t know the answer to that.

The wisdom of men is foolishness to God. God said things occurr because of catastrophe, not uniformity. Creation would fall into this category and just as God built time into His creation, which means adam and eve were not born or raised as an infants; likewise the entire universe was built with time, such as light from stars shining, trees bering fruit immediately et al. this is why man id fooled by the age of the earth, they don’t understand the nature of God and His creation. Add the global flood and what would that do to giving an appearance of time knowing the pressure that water has at just 3500 feet, which would crush a person.
++++++++++++++++++

Are you pulling my leg? Probably not… I feel like Sisyphus some days… It’s quite alright to believe in the Biblical creation story, the world will continue to turn and science will carry on without you. Mr. Science would say nobody would be crushed at any depth FYI.

Add earth quakes, volcanoes and the like. How many time has science changed the age of something and with no way of measuring with accuracy tens of thousands of years much less millions without a lot of presumptions, which is why it is not re-creatable, nor observable, which means it is guesswork and not science.

All humans are hypocrites, it is only a matter of degree.

“Free thinkers” is a nice sounding title with a form of godliness and a dash of humanist, but nevertheless is a human philosophy, which is like chaff before God and will be burned up. Everyone who does not trust in Christ Jesus for their freedom from sin and judgment will perish; being separated from God in this life and the next. May Christ open hearts and eyes throughout these forums to those who do not have a personal relationship with Jesus, the God-man.

This is off topic, so I am moving on, my only comment on homosexuality is see what God did to the sodomites in Sodom for the error of fornication and repent of the lifestyle and live for Christ.

You are right, we are off-topic.

Blessed be, Dousias
 
Seem to be as moral, and I sure there are a lot of “religious” people that are less moral than some people who do not go to church. But my original point was about what you said, that “Religious people are no better or worse than the population as a whole” in regards to morals. My point was that religion does produce some people that are of high moral caliber. I then asked for some examples of non-religious people that could be compared with Saints for example. Saints are known people that lived truly exceptional lives, although there are many more religious people whose lives could be compared to that of the Saints, but to be called a Saint their must be miracles that happen after the Saint has died.
+++++++++++++++++++

I see what you are saying. No, I don’t have a list of highly moral atheists or agnostics or secular humanists or Buddhists or Rastafarians. It’s conjecture saying most people have a balanced moral base they work with. That means all people choose the level of morality that they feel comfortable with.

But where does this morality come from? Common sense?
++++++++++++

Yes, that and experience. More moral people care more about other people. Less moral people care less about other people. Highly moral people care even more about other people. People without morals think only about themselves.

Why is Human Life thought to be so special? Or is nature also part of the Unity?
+++++++++++++

All life is special. All life is connected. When we treat all animals with respect and honor we then respect our own species more. If we have less honor and respect for “lower” animals then we may start thinking some races of man are also lower animals. We are in the likeness of God. God is infinite. We are all connected with Spirit. All other Spirit connects with us. All. We are one. If one takes the concept of connected oneness just a little further on in the logic process, then as infinite Spirits we are connected with all that there is, everywhere and on infinite levels. Right down to the atomic level and beyond.

Remember we are “Souls having a human experience.” Our Souls exist in infinite space and time through all dimensions known and unknown. We are infinite individuals existing within the infinite space and time of all other individuals. Can I make this concept any clearer?

It seems to me that if God did not will everything into existence, but instead everything just happened randomly and therefore everything is connected (unified).
++++++++++++

I don’t believe there is a God that willed anything into existence. I also don’t believe anything happens by chance. I do think someday we will get a handle on how this “God Effect” works. Since the dawn of conscience, man has felt this effect in his life. Across oceans and across vast territories, isolated groups have felt a Spirit that defied simple explanation. So myths arose to explain the unexplainable, hundreds even thousands of myths and stories and belief systems and religions have and still exist. It is this widespread occurrence that is my proof that Spirit or God is real. Man will understand what is going on someday. I think the explanation will forever change the face of mankind in the best way possible, unlocking this Soul of ours and freeing man and Soul to exist consciously connected. Oh don’t ask for any proof, I’m just channeling something from outside me.

Human life would seem to be no more important than the life of a cow. We are both just animals, that happened to evolve.
+++++++++++

You are getting closer to the truth… The life of a cow is no less important than ourselves!

Yet if we are just animals, then why is your life even equal to mine?
+++++++++++

See above…

If you have something I want, why should I just not take it?
+++++++++++

Because taking something that is not yours is wrong. That and I would beat the **** out of you if you tried! LOL!

Maybe you can shed some light on why Pantheists believe what they do.
+++++++++++++

We see God or Spirit in all of us. We have learned that living in Oneness with all is a logical, sensible and wholesome way to live. We have seen the path to enlightenment through dogmatic religions unsatisfying and ultimately doomed to failure. The New Age is routinely vilified by religionists ad nausium.

Gotta run!

Blessed be, Dousias
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top