Is your Pentecostalist pastor’s God so weak that His power to save is limited by the speed at which Christian missionaries could travel the world? Could his God save Australians before the first Christian missionaries arrived there? What of Native Americans before Columbus? Could the Pentecostalist God save them? The Catholic God could. I know which God I think is the more powerful and the more merciful.
rossum
You’re confusing chronology of the Faith’s spread with what is applicable NOW.
It is well established what the Church’s standpoint is on such examples, both in doctrine and Scripture.
However, Muslims specifically REJECT Jesus as the Messiah. Ergo, if they hear the Gospel and reject it until death and whatever period/events happen between “death” and true sealing of their eternal fate- yeah, they most definitely go to Hell according to Scripture and doctrine.
Do I think God will send to Hell some little urchin in the streets of Karachi, Pakistan or BFE, Afghanistan if they never heard the Gospel? Not outright, but I’m sure there will be a litmus test for entrance into Heaven- what did they do with the Law God wrote on their hearts? What about some little pygmy in Africa who never saw a missionary in his life? Same. What about someone in Yemen in a little village who has only been to the other dirty, poor village a few miles over? Same.
Now, what about Muslims in this day and age who have massive access to Christian resources, doctrine, teaching, etc?
Well, if they ignore the Holy Spirit’s pleas to become a Christian, and continue to reject Christ as the Messiah, they’re going to Hell. I’m not judging, I’m just going off of what Jesus Himself said, the various epistles say, and what Revelation says.
Furthermore, the Hebrew plainly points to a Triune God in the very Tanakh and its word usage regarding God. Elohim = plural; only way to get plural in semitic languages is via 3 or more. Adonai = again, plural; literally “my Lords”. Proverbs 8, plainly talks about Jesus as being part of God, but also distinct within the Trinity if you just look at what’s being said. Etc. Verses 30-36 are rabidly “New Testament” in their tone and in the context of the preceding verses can ONLY refer to Jesus.
The modern Jewish rejection of God in a Triune concept is just that, modern. The language, the ancient language, however, describes perfectly well when we just understand what it’s actually saying. Elohim becomes a title, great. But linguistically, it’s plural indicating unison in thought and action. Adonai, same.
Edit to add:
If you really think about it, islam is a sure ticket to Hell to begin with. It categorically rejects Christ, after the revelation of Christ, having been exposed to the Gospel. Your original arguments were founded in the concept of global chronological processes being equal with the objective chronology. Islam, in itself, is rectifiable within both. In fact, islam spread, largely in the Byzantine empire, through the outright rejection of ALL Christian dogma, because of having heard a false version of the Truth. Some of the most venerated cities in islam, including ones in Iraq, were Catholic strongholds. the city of my first deployment, Samarra, was actually a monastic town prior to islam. You will not find Christianity there today. Neither will you find anything other than a mosque over the site of a church St. Polycarp helped pastor or establish. It seeks, at every twist and turn, to supplant Christianity and murder our Jewish brethren. It is, by definition, antiChrist.