S
Sunheart
Guest
Our parish has two CCD programs for school-age kids: a one-week summer class and a traditional once-a-week class throughout the school year. The one-week option is so popular that they have a single two-hour registration period for it, and it’s first-come-first-serve. This creates the spectacle of parents lining up well before the two-hour window, jockeying for position to make sure their kid gets into the condensed class. Woe to those parents who make the mistake of showing up just before registration closing time, or who can’t make it at all. Their kids will end up in the year-long class. This strikes me as problematic on a few fronts. First, it seems to create a two-tiered system: the “lucky” kids who “get to” cram their CCD classes into one week in the summer, and the “unlucky” ones who have to slog through the traditional weekly program. How motivated are those kids who didn’t make the cut for the summer option? Won’t they automatically feel ripped off and resentful, if they have peers who got their CCD “over with” in the summer? And doesn’t the whole concept then really demean what CCD is supposed to be about? If those summer slots are in such great demand, shouldn’t the parish put more resources into expanding that option so that EVERYONE has a chance to do it? Or, to take a different view, how can CCD be crammed into five three-hour days without losing huge chunks of relevancy and impact? And finally, if you must have two sessions, shouldn’t you draw names to select the coveted summer slots? Much more fair than first-come, first-served.