Cdl Bertone Takes on the Da Vinci Code

  • Thread starter Thread starter HagiaSophia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

HagiaSophia

Guest
THE Vatican has appointed a top cardinal to rebut what it says are the lies, distortions and errors in Dan Brown’s bestselling thriller The Da Vinci Code.

Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Archbishop of Genoa and a possible successor to the Pope, immediately took up the fight yesterday by claiming that the novel was a deliberate attempt to discredit the Roman Catholic Church through absurd and vulgar falsifications.

At the heart of the book is the notion that the Church has for centuries concealed the fact that Jesus married Mary Magdalene, a former prostitute, and that she bore him a child.

The appointment of Cardinal Bertone, 70, is a clear sign that the Vatican has been rattled by the continuing worldwide success of Brown’s thriller, which has sold 18 million copies in 44 languages in just two years. It is still among the top ten bestsellers in the United States, France, Brazil and Argentina — all countries with huge Catholic populations — and Britain.

The cardinal said that the book reminded him of intemperate anti-clerical pamphlets of the 19th century. He will seek to debunk the conspiracy theories at the heart of the plot in a string of public debates on the work beginning in Genoa tomorrow.

He said he was distressed to discover that even Catholic bookshops were selling the book. “We are clearly facing a formidable distribution strategy here,” he said.

"…His latest task is “to unmask the lies” so that readers can see how “shameful and unfounded” the book is. One of his first steps will be to debunk the suggestion that the Church has become male dominated and has buried its feminine side, Cardinal Bertone told Il Giornale newspaper. “In fact the female element is ever present in the Gospels, not least in the person of the Virgin Mary.”

He insisted that the trial, death and resurrection of Christ were indisputable. Evidence, he said, came from the accounts of disciples who, as former fishermen, were hard-headed realists. He accused Brown of relying on apocryphal texts that had been excluded from the biblical canon precisely because they were imaginative.

“He even perverts the story of the Holy Grail, …"

timesonline.co.uk/article/0,11069-1525702,00.html
 
Cleric defends Da Vinci Code book
A Brazilian bishop has come out against calls by a Catholic Cardinal to boycott controversial novel The Da Vinci Code.
Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Archbishop of Genoa, has called Dan Brown’s thriller “shameful”.

But Monsignor Jose Maria Pinheiro - nominated to be bishop of Sao Paulo by Pope John Paul II two weeks ago - urged readers to use “prudence”.

He said Cardinal Bertone’s views on the best-seller were “personal” and not official church views.

The Da Vinci Code has been a publishing sensation around the world and is still featuring in best-seller lists.
Its conspiracy theories and thriller style, in which two code-breakers try to track down the truth behind the Holy Grail, have caught the imaginations of millions.

“I would recommend prudence,” said Monsignor Pinheiro.

"I don’t know if people are capable of distinguishing the elements of fiction from those of reality.
“It is important to talk to young people about it so that they can differentiate, but I don’t think it’s necessary to ban its reading,” he added.

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/4356945.stm
 
“I don’t know if people are capable of distinguishing the elements of fiction from those of reality.”

Exactly! If you don’t know…why encourage it! There are too many ignorant Catholics all around and feeding them this trash will only add to their ignorance. Talking about protecting the sheeps from the shephard! Your emminence, if you can’t help Bishop Bertone, don’t ruin his work which will bear much fruit!
 
40.png
cathgal:
Your Eminence, if you can’t help Bishop Bertone, don’t ruin his work which will bear much fruit!
Censorship, even of trash, is a losing proposition.
 
40.png
Richardols:
Censorship, even of trash, is a losing proposition.
It is fiction, but I wouldn’t call it trash. That people take it for non-fiction and that the author hasn’t come out strongly and said it was fiction, is his sin. But I wouldn’t call the book trash.
 
This is a Catholic forum, so I don’t expect the non-Catholic to agree.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top