CDWDS response regarding blessings during Communion procession

  • Thread starter Thread starter japhy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Personally, I appreciate the correction and comments.

After 20+ years away, I started to attend Mass again shortly after Christmas. Of course, I knew I was not eligible for communion. However, I was surprised that “my new parish” engaged in the blessing in lieu of the eucharist for both “guests of the church and Catholics who for one reason or another cannot accept the eucharist.”

Assuming this was something new since my last mass, I have to tell you that I did partake of the “blessing” at the time of communion. And, I was happy to recieve the blessing. But, now that I understand better the reasons for not partaking, I will no longer do so.

So, thanks…

Keith
 
Gloria, I might just add to FrDavid96’s response what my pastor told me.

He said “it’s a communion line, not a blessing line” !
forgive me please, for not reading through the whole thread.
I am already choosing to leave my daughter in the pew, but a year ago or more, i would never have felt safe to leave my child alone in the pew while I go up to receive. If we take our purses with us, we should also take little children.
 
Personally, I appreciate the correction and comments.

After 20+ years away, I started to attend Mass again shortly after Christmas.** Of course, I knew I was not eligible for communion. ** However, I was surprised that “my new parish” engaged in the blessing in lieu of the eucharist for both “guests of the church and Catholics who for one reason or another cannot accept the eucharist.”

Assuming this was something new since my last mass, I have to tell you that I did partake of the “blessing” at the time of communion. And, I was happy to recieve the blessing. But, now that I understand better the reasons for not partaking, I will no longer do so.

So, thanks…

Keith
I could have written this word for word myself. Welcome Home, Keith.
I was also away for 20 yrs. I too **“of course, knew I was not eligible for Communion.” **

😃
 
forgive me please, for not reading through the whole thread.
I am already choosing to leave my daughter in the pew, but a year ago or more, i would never have felt safe to leave my child alone in the pew while I go up to receive. If we take our purses with us, we should also take little children.
Of course…there is no reason you can’t carry or walk your small child with you.
 
Of course…there is no reason you can’t carry or walk your small child with you.
No, no one has ever advocated that practice. Just instruct the kids not to approach the priest with their arms crossed. That is all.
 
I’m starting RCIA classes in the fall, and our Director of Religious Education has encouraged me on more than one occasion to go forward and receive a blessing during Communion.

My daughter and I only did so once, and it felt really awkward and wrong. I’m actually relieved to discover it’s not supposed to be that way. My daughter’s school (she’ll start in the fall) has all non-Catholic and pre-FHC kids go forward for a blessing, though.
 
I’m starting RCIA classes in the fall, and our Director of Religious Education has encouraged me on more than one occasion to go forward and receive a blessing during Communion.

My daughter and I only did so once, and it felt really awkward and wrong. I’m actually relieved to discover it’s not supposed to be that way. My daughter’s school (she’ll start in the fall) has all non-Catholic and pre-FHC kids go forward for a blessing, though.
Just print out the letter from CDWDS and carry it with you! 😉 You’re off to a good start…👍
 
Thanks for all your (name removed by moderator)ut. From what I have gathered the respondents think I am “misguided in my attempt to be included”, “disobedient” according to some formal publication that only clergy are familiar with, and ignorant to the fact that there is a blessing at the end of each mass.

I think I will stay off of this site from now on. I’m glad I did not seek the advise of those on this site before deciding to return to the church, or I most likely wouldn’t have.

For those who wished me well, thank you. As for the rest of the advisers, thanks for opening my eyes.
(No need to respond, I won’t be back)
After reading the posts you made I rather suspected that you would not.
 
For the back-story, see this thread: EMHC Blessings.

Here is the letter which I wrote to the CDWDS in August (on behalf of myself and user lmashburn):Your Eminence:

Greetings in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. I am writing to you on behalf of a layman of the diocese of Savannah, Georgia, as well as myself, a layman of the diocese of Metuchen, New Jersey. We have a question in two parts for the Congregation concerning a custom found in various Latin Rite parishes and dioceses throughout Canada and the United States of America: the blessing of non-communicants, by a minister of Holy Communion, during the Communion procession.

Briefly stated, this custom consists of a non-communicant presenting himself (often with his arms crossed over his chest, his hands placed on his shoulders, signifying his intent) before a minister of Holy Communion and receiving a blessing from the same, in the form of a short prayer (e.g. “May God bless you”) or a gesture (e.g. the Sign of the Cross traced on his forehead). In some places, the blessing varies depending on whether the minister of Holy Communion is an ordinary minister or an extraordinary minister.
  1. Is this a custom that is within the faculty of a pastor, the local Ordinary, or a Bishops’ Conference to establish? That is, is this custom something that can be regulated without recourse to this Congregation?
  2. Are there particular guidelines or restrictions from this Congregation concerning a) which ministers of Holy Communion may give these blessings and b) what forms these blessings may take?
We assure you of our prayers for you, thank you for whatever consideration you can give to this question, and remain

Faithfully yours in Christ,
Here is the response I received in the mail today (Prot. N. 930/08/L):
Dear [names omitted],

This Congregation for Divine Worship and the Disciple of the Sacraments acknowledges receipt of your kind letter of 13 August, 2008 and would like to thank you for your interest and suggestions. This matter is presently under the attentive study of the Congregation.

For the present, therefore, this Dicastery wishes to limit itself to the following observations:

  1. *]The liturgical blessing of the Holy Mass is properly given to each and to all at the conclusion of the Mass, just a few moments subsequent to the distribution of Holy Communion.
    *]Lay people, within the context of Holy Mass, are unable to confer blessings. These blessings, rather, are the competence of the priest (cf. Ecclesia de Mysterio, Notitiae 34 (15 Aug. 1997), art. 6, § 2; can. 1169, § 2; and Roman Ritual De Benedictionibus (1985), n. 18).
    *]Furthermore, the laying on of a hand or hands – which has its own sacramental significance, inappropriate here – by those distributing Holy Communion, in substitution for its reception, is to be explicitly discouraged.
    *]The Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio, n. 84, “forbids any pastor, for whatever reason to pretext even of a pastoral nature, to perform ceremonies of any kind for divorced people who remarry.” To be feared is that any form of blessing in substitution for communion would give the impression that the divorced and remarried have been returned, in some sense, to the status of Catholics in good standing.
    *]In a similar way, for others who are not to be admitted to Holy Communion in accord with the norm of law, the Church’s discipline has already made clear that they should not approach Holy Communion nor receive a blessing. This would include non-Catholics and those envisaged in can. 915 (i.e., those under the penalty of excommunication or interdict, and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin).

    Please continue to pray for the Church’s ministers that they ever become more worthy of the mystery they celebrate.

    With every good wish and kind regard, I am,

    Sincerely Yours in Christ,

    [name omitted]
    Is that sufficient to settle the matter until the Church makes a further statement on the matter?
 
Hi,

In my catechuman class here in Sweden, I gave this document to the priest holding the class.

He tried to defend the blessing activity in holy communion when reading:

“5. In a similar way, for others who are not to be admitted to Holy Communion in accord with the norm of law, the Church’s discipline has already made clear that they should not approach Holy Communion nor receive a blessing. This would include non-Catholics and those envisaged in can. 915 (i.e., those under the penalty of excommunication or interdict, and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin).”

He said something like that 915 is only for those “banned” to receive communion, and that a catechuman is not a non Catholic, he may have refered to be a Catholic by desire…

Can you please help me, what should I say?

And where can I read about “the norm of law”, is that refering to 915 only?
 
I could have written this word for word myself. Welcome Home, Keith.
I was also away for 20 yrs. I too **“of course, knew I was not eligible for Communion.” **

Yeah, me too. 26, but who’s counting.
But my DD is really shy & it’s hard because being Celiac I can’t recieve & I don’t know how I should encourage my pre-1st-Communion child. (who is not Celiac so she can recieve.) Like, what do I do when her first Communion is here & all the parents go up to recieve with their children. I remember it as a family ritual sort of thing. CCD starts next week-I’m armed with my list of questuins!
 
graceandglory;4899184:
I could have written this word for word myself. Welcome Home, Keith.
I was also away for 20 yrs. I too **“of course, knew I was not eligible for Communion.” **
Yeah, me too. 26, but who’s counting.
But my DD is really shy & it’s hard because being Celiac I can’t recieve & I don’t know how I should encourage my pre-1st-Communion child. (who is not Celiac so she can recieve.) Like, what do I do when her first Communion is here & all the parents go up to recieve with their children. I remember it as a family ritual sort of thing. CCD starts next week-I’m armed with my list of questuins!
You have a chat with the priest about receiving only the Precious Blood from the Chalice.

If there is only one chalice and the small particle of the Host that he puts in is still too much for you, you ask if he can consecrate only a small amount of wine for you in a separate Chalice and you explain to your daughter why you are receiving that way instead of the way she is going to receive.
 
graceandglory;4899184:
I could have written this word for word myself. Welcome Home, Keith.
I was also away for 20 yrs. I too **“of course, knew I was not eligible for Communion.” **
Yeah, me too. 26, but who’s counting.
But my DD is really shy & it’s hard because being Celiac I can’t recieve & I don’t know how I should encourage my pre-1st-Communion child. (who is not Celiac so she can recieve.) Like, what do I do when her first Communion is here & all the parents go up to recieve with their children. I remember it as a family ritual sort of thing. CCD starts next week-I’m armed with my list of questuins!

Have you ever tried the low-gluten hosts? They’re not gluten-free, but many can tolerate these.
 
I can foresee the catechesis on this matter will require a great deal of sensitivity, but I hope it isn’t too far off. There is a lot of confusion out there right now, and EMHC who do not want to give a blessing are put in a no-win spot, whether they refuse or whether they don’t. I’m sure it is easier and less confusing in parishes where the priests also don’t give blessings to non-communicants during Holy Communion. As for blessings involving touching, I think it is pretty clear why a priest would want to avoid touching anyone’s face or hair before he’s finished distributing Holy Communion.
 
[My priest] tried to defend the blessing activity in holy communion when reading:

“5. In a similar way, for others who are not to be admitted to Holy Communion in accord with the norm of law, the Church’s discipline has already made clear that they should not approach Holy Communion nor receive a blessing. This would include non-Catholics and those envisaged in can. 915 (i.e., those under the penalty of excommunication or interdict, and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin).”

He said something like that 915 is only for those “banned” to receive communion, and that a catechuman is not a non Catholic, he may have refered to be a Catholic by desire.
Just because a person is Catholic does not mean they are de facto “to be admitted to Holy Communion”. And yes, catechumens are in a special category, being Catholics “by desire”. If you were die as a catechumen before receiving baptism, your desire for baptism would suffice. But anyway, on to the real issue: what is the “norm of law” in this case?

Can. 844 §1 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments only to catholic members of Christ’s faithful, who equally may lawfully receive them only from catholic ministers, except as provided in §§2, 3 and 4 of this canon…

Can. 844 §2 [not applicable]

Can. 844 §3 [not applicable to you]

Can. 844 §4 If there is a danger of death or if, in the judgement of the diocesan Bishop or of the Episcopal Conference, there is some other grave and pressing need, catholic ministers may lawfully administer these same sacraments to other christians not in full communion with the catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who spontaneously ask for them, provided that they demonstrate the catholic faith in respect of these sacraments and are properly disposed.

Can. 912 Any baptised person who is not forbidden by law may and must be admitted to holy communion.

Can. 913 §1 For holy communion to be administered to children, it is required that they have sufficient knowledge and be accurately prepared

Can. 915 Those upon whom the penalty of excommunication or interdict has been imposed or declared, and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin, are not to be admitted to holy communion.

Can. 916 Anyone who is conscious of grave sin may not celebrate Mass or receive the Body of the Lord without previously having been to sacramental confession, unless there is a grave reason and there is no opportunity to confess; in this case the person is to remember the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition, which includes the resolve to go to confession as soon as possible.

As you are a catechumen (non-baptized), you are not to be admitted to Holy Communion. Even if you were baptized but not Catholic yet (not a “catechumen”, properly speaking, but a candidate for full communion with the Church), only for a “grave and pressing need” would you be admitted to Holy Communion.
 
Just because a person is Catholic does not mean they are de facto “to be admitted to Holy Communion”. And yes, catechumens are in a special category, being Catholics “by desire”. If you were die as a catechumen before receiving baptism, your desire for baptism would suffice. But anyway, on to the real issue: what is the “norm of law” in this case?

Can. 844 §1 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments only to catholic members of Christ’s faithful, who equally may lawfully receive them only from catholic ministers, except as provided in §§2, 3 and 4 of this canon…

Can. 844 §2 [not applicable]

Can. 844 §3 [not applicable to you]

Can. 844 §4 If there is a danger of death or if, in the judgement of the diocesan Bishop or of the Episcopal Conference, there is some other grave and pressing need, catholic ministers may lawfully administer these same sacraments to other christians not in full communion with the catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who spontaneously ask for them, provided that they demonstrate the catholic faith in respect of these sacraments and are properly disposed.

Can. 912 Any baptised person who is not forbidden by law may and must be admitted to holy communion.

Can. 913 §1 For holy communion to be administered to children, it is required that they have sufficient knowledge and be accurately prepared

Can. 915 Those upon whom the penalty of excommunication or interdict has been imposed or declared, and others who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin, are not to be admitted to holy communion.

Can. 916 Anyone who is conscious of grave sin may not celebrate Mass or receive the Body of the Lord without previously having been to sacramental confession, unless there is a grave reason and there is no opportunity to confess; in this case the person is to remember the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition, which includes the resolve to go to confession as soon as possible.

As you are a catechumen (non-baptized), you are not to be admitted to Holy Communion. Even if you were baptized but not Catholic yet (not a “catechumen”, properly speaking, but a candidate for full communion with the Church), only for a “grave and pressing need” would you be admitted to Holy Communion.
The priest also went on saying something like, that he had seen the Pope give blessings at mass, and that the letter is not directly from the Pope just from an undersecretary.

Please help…
 
graceandglory;4899184:
I could have written this word for word myself. Welcome Home, Keith.
I was also away for 20 yrs. I too **“of course, knew I was not eligible for Communion.” **
Yeah, me too. 26, but who’s counting.
But my DD is really shy & it’s hard because being Celiac I can’t recieve & I don’t know how I should encourage my pre-1st-Communion child. (who is not Celiac so she can recieve.) Like, what do I do when her first Communion is here & all the parents go up to recieve with their children. I remember it as a family ritual sort of thing. CCD starts next week-I’m armed with my list of questuins!

I know it may be different in different parishes but in my parish, the families go up together but they don’t all receive Communion. Whether it is an “irregular” marriage, a non-Catholic parent or whatever, often only the child receives with the parents standing by beaming. 🙂 If you were to decide not to receive Communion at your child’s First Communion Mass, it would not likely be unusual. As long as you explain it to your daughter and make arrangements to receive at Sunday Masses, it would probably be just fine. Even if someone noticed, those who don’t know you wouldn’t know why and those that do know you probably know about the celiac and will understand.
 
Father told me today to just walk up with her, that I won’t be the only parent not recieving. My baby’s getting the Sacraments!
 
And no, I won’t ge fetting a ‘blessing’ I’ll just walk up with her with a big smile!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top