P
PRmerger
Guest
I understand your question, bonvivantHermit. And I’m not sure why it’s prompted such snarkiness. It is indeed an interesting phenomenon.First of all- why is it wrong to question the idea of “celebrity” priest? From the snarky answers I have read, seems there is an inordinate attachment to personalities.
The Church got into a lot of trouble when we protected SOME priests in the past. The attitude was that father was not to be questioned, that lead to questioning by police and the collective questioning of the Catholic conscience.
There are obvious fallen celebrity priests out there, I can think of one “cutie”… and his case mild in comparision.
I will not make a list of fallen priests here, that’s not the point.
What I am interested in, is the profile of the fallen celebrity priest.
I would argue the Pope is not a celebrity nor is Jesus- they’re well-known and
celebrated but not celebrities.
I’ll start- the Pope did not necessarily want/seek his post, the celebrities built their empires.
And I understand your reluctance to name any particular fallen priest. That is judicious.
The phenomenon of celebrity anything is interesting in that it does seem to lend itself more to a fallen lifestyle.
Why this occurs is worthy of further discussion.