Except for the last part, most of them are believed by the Orthodox Church as well. See, there are actually more similarities than differences with both Churches. I would rather start from there than go into the differences.
I think Mickey’s point is clear–the early Fathers would recognize Divine Liturgy immediately, especially if they run into the Liturgy of St. James or even St. Basil, though no doubt they would still recognize the Liturgy of St. John Crysostom. I have commented on another thread on this board regarding how 4th century Rome celebrated Mass, and it seems much closer to Divine Liturgy than Tridentine or even Novus Ordo. The thread in question then:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=200272 My comment is post 11, if I am correct, to which the thread starter verified that the Liturgies of the two were very similar back then. Guess the Orthodox Church then has kept Holy Tradition here much better. So to reply to this–the early Fathers will recognize Christ’s Presence in Divine Liturgy more than in the Novus Ordo, as it is the Liturgy they were familiar with, and would see the Novus Ordo as an innovation of Divine Liturgy (and we need not go into the horrors of clown Masses, “liturgical dance”, and other such abuses which seem to have taken hold in a number of parishes).