Changing banks who support SSM. Sinful?

[chris62]

Not on your part, no. I find it extraordinary that a corporation would take a position on such an issue, unless mandated by their share owners. It is not the business of banks to pursue an agenda related to marriage law.

I find it extraordinary as well.

 

[Bradski]

I will let you know how I get on.
But can you let me know why an atheist is against same sex marriage?

You don’t have to a Christian to be against it or an atheist to support it.

And I’m not against it. The sarcasm in my post was probably a little too subtle…

 

[signit]

Not on your part, no. I find it extraordinary that a corporation would take a position on such an issue, unless mandated by their share owners. It is not the business of banks to pursue an agenda related to marriage law.

I find it extraordinary as well.

From a thread last year:

afer.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Bostic-Amicus-Brief-in-Support-of-Granting-Cert-30-Companies.pdf

Just looking out for their own bottom line (not just because “it’s the right thing to do”). there seems to be plenty of motive why they would support it, including employee retention and administrative costs.