L
Lifeisbeautiful3
Guest
I live in the Bible Belt and the topic of religion and spirituality sometimes come up. Occasionally, a neighbor or coworker will invite me to their church and I have offered to attend if they, in turn would accompany me to a Catholic mass. They have always declined, sine Protestants often eschew the Catholic faith.
Recently, however, a friend accepted the opportunity. I attended his ‘non-denominational’ mega church (which feels very much like a demnomination unto itself). The music and lighting was unlike anything I’ve ever seen and pastor/preacher had a very witty and engaging sermon. As promised, my friend attended mass with me and enjoyed much of it!
The salient question he posed was, whether there are alternatives to the music and tempo of the sermon. I then took him to a ‘Life Teen’ mass, which has a livelier musical style (e.g. a praise band. While more contemporary, it doesn’t begin to feel modern relative to his ‘worship experience’, and the priest had a fairy dry/dull sermon.
The follow-up question he posed (and I think it’s a valid question) is whether a mass could be true to our roots, but with the accoutrements offered in his mega church (different lighting, smoke machines, loud repetitive music, and a charismatic and engaging priest/deacon). While this wouldn’t likely appeal to me, or many traditional Catholics, I do think it would appeal to some who have fallen away from the Church and some younger people. For what it’s worth, his church has annual contributions of $30MM across many ‘campus locations’.
Why couldn’t a homily be livelier? Why couldn’t the tempo of the opening before the priest arrives and egress include more modern ‘rock music’?
Recently, however, a friend accepted the opportunity. I attended his ‘non-denominational’ mega church (which feels very much like a demnomination unto itself). The music and lighting was unlike anything I’ve ever seen and pastor/preacher had a very witty and engaging sermon. As promised, my friend attended mass with me and enjoyed much of it!
The salient question he posed was, whether there are alternatives to the music and tempo of the sermon. I then took him to a ‘Life Teen’ mass, which has a livelier musical style (e.g. a praise band. While more contemporary, it doesn’t begin to feel modern relative to his ‘worship experience’, and the priest had a fairy dry/dull sermon.
The follow-up question he posed (and I think it’s a valid question) is whether a mass could be true to our roots, but with the accoutrements offered in his mega church (different lighting, smoke machines, loud repetitive music, and a charismatic and engaging priest/deacon). While this wouldn’t likely appeal to me, or many traditional Catholics, I do think it would appeal to some who have fallen away from the Church and some younger people. For what it’s worth, his church has annual contributions of $30MM across many ‘campus locations’.
Why couldn’t a homily be livelier? Why couldn’t the tempo of the opening before the priest arrives and egress include more modern ‘rock music’?