Chaput: Fr. James Martin's message causes confusion about Church doctrine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxirad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
For anyone who might be interested, Fr. Martin has responded. Among other things, Fr. Martin note that his speech was identical to the one he gave at the World Meeting of Families, which was approved by the Vatican.

Full text of response:

Dear Archbishop:

The Peace of Christ!

Many thanks for sending your column ahead of time. I’m sorry that you felt the need to publish it.

I think my main response is that it’s difficult to respond to critiques that I am “implying” things, when I am assiduous in my writings and talks about not challenging church teaching. I have written clearly about that here, among other places: https://www.americamagazine.org/…/what-official-church-teac…

Also, the lecture at St. Joseph’s University this week, which prompted your article, is the same lecture that I presented at the World Meeting of Families in Dublin last year, the text of which was vetted and approved beforehand by the Vatican.

One of the reasons that I don’t focus on same-sex relations and same-sex marriage, which I know are both impermissible (and immoral) under church teaching, is that LGBT Catholics have heard this repeatedly. Indeed, often that is the only thing that they hear from their church.

What I am trying to do instead is encourage Catholics to see LGBT people as more than just sexual beings, to see them in their totality, much as Jesus saw people on the margins, people who were also seen as “other” in his time.

I remain grateful for your asking people not to engage in ad hominem attacks, and I appreciate the careful tone of your letter and have always appreciated your kind communications with me.

Thanks again for sending this.

Peace,
Jim
 
He’s been speaking all over the Archdiocese for a while so I’m a little surprised the Archbishop didn’t say anything sooner. Saw him myself there last year.

I agree that Fr. Martin is very careful what he says in these talks. He did not say anything against Church teaching. He didn’t even make a face or imply through body language anything against Church teaching. I’m pretty sure he knows people are out to get him and he’s not going to give them any ammo.

The vast majority of people who go to his talks are the ones who don’t really need his message because they’re already on board with it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top