M
myfavoritmartin
Guest
It has to do with how scripture speaks toward how we worship our Lord and Savior Jesus.
God bless you all. Please pray for our priests.That’s funny… so let’s add another distraction thank you very much… lol… your logic makes me laugh… again. Let’s just go with what the Church asks us to do rather than add to the liturgy, which is wrong, by the way, as I’ve stated and proved without a doubt, as the CDF has stated as well… I’m not going to repeat myself 30 times in the same thread.
As for closing your eyes at Mass while praying… you should do just that rather than watch people pray with their eyes open… at least they’re praying, as you stated. You’re only watching these people with open eyes and judging if they’re praying or not. Your eyes are obviously open for you to be able to see that, no?
What does it have to do with the Mass? Can you please find a Vatican Document stating or using this psalm specifically for divine worship of the Holy Eucharist and at Mass?It has to do with how scripture speaks toward how we worship our Lord and Savior Jesus.
This is about personal worship. This is not a liturgical rubric. I find it disturbing that you find it so easy to disregard the Vatican’s norms for worship based on personal interpretation.It has to do with how scripture speaks toward how we worship our Lord and Savior Jesus.
No … they are open as I walk back down the aisle to get to my seat. Perhaps ONLY YOU can walk about with closed eyes w/o falling & creating a massive distractionYou’re only watching these people with open eyes and judging if they’re praying or not. Your eyes are obviously open for you to be able to see that, no?
God bless you all and take care! I hope and pray for you all.
It would seem to me that when GOD decides to humble Himself to the lower state of a man leaving behind much of what he is and has, to take on the state of a human with all his frailties and limitations is a big thing! At the same time knowing that becoming a man means he would have to suffer and die along the way. He did it by choosing to do so, so that we ALL might have life. He deserves our humble adoration and praise for this single act because this one step into our Humanity had all the consequences that followed that decision.Why does the Incarnation merit bowing whereas, say, the Crucifixion is ignored? The Father Almighty is ignored? The death of our Lord is ignored? Any ideas why this singular event is bowed at?
I am somewhat of a charismatic Catholic. I’m not really active in the movement though. But anyway, there is nothing wrong with not being a charismatic Catholic.
I find it disturbing that you so easily disregard God’s Word. Here, Psalm 150, we have what God says about praising Him. There were many ways of worship in the OT but this is definitely one of them.This is about personal worship. This is not a liturgical rubric. I find it disturbing that you find it so easy to disregard the Vatican’s norms for worship based on personal interpretation.
You cannot just do what you want during the Mass. Rubrics must be followed. Vatican II did not turn the Mass to a free for all. Show me in the rubrics where the novelties you like are permitted.I find it disturbing that you so easily disregard God’s Word. Here, Psalm 150, we have what God says about praising Him. There were many ways of worship in the OT but this is definitely one of them.
Since the community gathers primarily for mass, this make’s the mass the primary praise and worship venue. We that are Charistmatic would like to be able to praise and worship like Psalm 150 but also around the Eucharist. How do we do that? If we have a Charismatic mass, anti-charismatics get there rubrics all bent out of shape and condemn us. Let us have our Eucharistic Celebration.
With concepts like ‘liturgical rubric’ no wonder the Vatican is full of lawyers! Maybe we need a Charismatic lawyer? Naw, a contradiction in terms.
Also, the norms have changed over the centuries. The norms have changed within our lifetime if you were born pre Vat II.
The Baptism of the Holy Spirit has made me better and that gives me joy just waiting to explode.
I go to Franciscan University of Steubenville, in Steubenville, Ohio. I do not consider myself a Charismatic Catholic, but the university is very active in the Charismatic Renewal. I was unaware of this when I first came to the university. What drew me here was the top-motch faculty in the theology department. I would describe myself as being mainstream, with some fairly traditional tendencies. For example, I love the Latin High Mass, and do not care for contemporary music in the Liturgy. That being said, the Charismatic Renewal may have begun “about 30 years ago” as one poster said, but baptism of the Holy Spirit (which is really what the movement is all about) has its roots in Sacred Scripture. If anyone on this thread has suggested that the movement is “dangerous,” than they are wrong, plain and simple. Baptism in the Holy Spirit is what happened at Pentecost. When we were baptized (no matter what age we were at the time), we received the Holy Spirit. The Charismatic Renewal is not about waving your hands in the air, contemporary music, or anything else so superficial. The renewal is about recapturing what we have lost. It is about recieving the Gifts of the Holy Spirit. The Charismatic Renewal is not Catholics adapting a “Protestant thing.” The Charismatic Renewal is reclaiming what is ours.
Novelties??? You call the Word of God, Psalm 150, a novelty?You cannot just do what you want during the Mass. Rubrics must be followed. Vatican II did not turn the Mass to a free for all. Show me in the rubrics where the novelties you like are permitted.
Stop misapplying the Scriptures. You cannot use Pslam 150 as an excuse for liturgical abuse. If you would actually read the V2 documents, you would see that it did not allow for such ridiculousness as making up a new liturgy as you go along. It is because of this misapplication of V2 that abuses happen. Note I am not blaming Vatican 2, but liberals like yourself who want to discard 2000 years of Sacred Tradition. Vatican 2 abolished nothing. I, for one, have little patience for those who think their form of worship is superior to all others. You apparently think that the only kind of worship that is acceptable is that which is based on liturgical abuse.Novelties??? You call the Word of God, Psalm 150, a novelty?
You missed the point about Vat II - the point is that norms change.
It would seem good to me if a group of people were excited about faith, about worship, about Jesus, that I could be supportive instead of condemning.
Jesus found in His time here that the most law abiding were the coldest of heart towards God; in fact He said, “they honor me with their lips but their hearts are far from me!”
I don’t know your heart but why are you not willing to extend charity and encouragement. One can be law abiding, yet supportive. I find that anti-charismatics claim to be law abiding yet are very condemning. Why are you all hiding behind the law? If the Vatican can find good and be supportive of the Charismatic Renewal, why can’t you all?
After reading about 145 replies to the original OP, I found that the majority of the posts were NOT by Charismatic Catholics, and were often by people who with little or no first-hand knowledge of the subject. Some entries were posted by clueless people ranting about their personal prejudices and misconceptions or quoting blindly from scripture. Not surprisingly, no one even attempted to answer a key question asked by FRANKYG in the OP “Now is this what Charismatic means?”Hello,
How many of you are charismatic catholics? I am only 20 years old, but i dont feel like im Charismatic, I have a hard time trying to wave my hands during a song for our Lord… Now is this what Charismatic means? I really enjoy gettin on my knees and praying instead, thankin God for all his blessings… Am I wrong for not being Charismatic?
Thanks guys![]()
Ha, ha… that would be funny…No … they are open as I walk back down the aisle to get to my seat. Perhaps ONLY YOU can walk about with closed eyes w/o falling & creating a massive distraction![]()
And also with you …Ha, ha… that would be funny…. But my intention at that point is not to look at people, my intention as I walk down back to my seat is to remain in the prayerful mentality that I was in before receiving communion rather than be distracted by looking and noticing other’s demeanor during the course of the Mass…
I hope you understand what I’m getting at. I just don’t see the point. Anyhow. God bless and take care!![]()
Out of my whole post this is what you got?Stop misapplying the Scriptures. You cannot use Pslam 150 as an excuse for liturgical abuse. If you would actually read the V2 documents, you would see that it did not allow for such ridiculousness as making up a new liturgy as you go along. It is because of this misapplication of V2 that abuses happen. Note I am not blaming Vatican 2, but liberals like yourself who want to discard 2000 years of Sacred Tradition. Vatican 2 abolished nothing. I, for one, have little patience for those who think their form of worship is superior to all others. You apparently think that the only kind of worship that is acceptable is that which is based on liturgical abuse.