Chemicals in environment affecting sexual orientation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Country_Gal
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Country_Gal

Guest
There is some evidence that some chemicals in the environment is leading to less masculine boys and contributing to an increase in homosexuality. My common sense meter tells me that this is true. In fact, toxins in polluted streams have caused fish to become female, scientists have discovered, so why wouldn’t they affect human babies in the womb.
Now a new study has found that altering the androgens of a fetus during early pregnancy – this time by by-products of PVC (the plastic pipes found in most home plumbing) – can not only alter the gender of the brain but can change the formation of the genitals in the newborn.
A study of 145 preschool children reports in the International Journal of Andrology, for the first time, that when the concentrations of two common phthalates in mothers’ prenatal urine are elevated their sons are less likely to play with male-typical toys and games, such as trucks and play fighting.
Environmentally caused Homosexuality

Of course, as many things, environmental influences (chemical toxins, nutritional factors, and emotional factors) interact with genetic factors. Not every person exposed to carcinogens gets cancer. Not every smoker gets COPD or lung cancer.

But studies are starting to come out that plastics do disrupt hormones in humans, and this can definitely affect babies in the womb, and their development.
 
Beware of BPA’s (still in can liners) and estrogens in the environment and water supply.
 
There is some evidence that some chemicals in the environment is leading to less masculine boys and contributing to an increase in homosexuality. My common sense meter tells me that this is true. In fact, toxins in polluted streams have caused fish to become female, scientists have discovered, so why wouldn’t they affect human babies in the womb.

Environmentally caused Homosexuality

Of course, as many things, environmental influences (chemical toxins, nutritional factors, and emotional factors) interact with genetic factors. Not every person exposed to carcinogens gets cancer. Not every smoker gets COPD or lung cancer.

But studies are starting to come out that plastics do disrupt hormones in humans, and this can definitely affect babies in the womb, and their development.
I would like to have analyzed their data myself (I’m a research psychologist). Studies like this very often fall to the wayside. A replication is sorely needed. I’ve seen so many studies like this use faulty research methods. Very often, a publication is needed for next year’s research grant.
 
Well then, how does one think lesbians come to be? I think this may be a very questionable hypothesis
 
History has definitely shown us that nations experiment on their own people all the time, the CIA did this all the time back the 50s, 60s and 70s, I would not be surprised if this goes on to this day to one degree or another.
 
Also, GMO foods can mess with your hormone levels as well, so I wouldn’t doubt that they could cause this kind of development in kids. Especially soy products. Soy by itself can cause some hormonal issues, mostly in women, but the GMO soy is worse.
 
Well then, how does one think lesbians come to be? I think this may be a very questionable hypothesis
I don’t say that it causes all homosexuality, but I do think we are seeing an increase in both homosexuality in men and in more feminized men.

Lesbianism is more complex. I’ve read, elsewhere, that these plastics also disrupt women’s hormonal systems. It’s long been documented that lesbians have a much higher rate of female problems of all sorts. This is readily admitted to in the lesbian community itself.

I do believe that women’s sexuality is far more influenced by psychological factors, generally. Women tend to be more emotionally complex, generally.
 
I don’t say that it causes all homosexuality, but I do think we are seeing an increase in both homosexuality in men and in more feminized men.

Lesbianism is more complex. I’ve read, elsewhere, that these plastics also disrupt women’s hormonal systems. It’s long been documented that lesbians have a much higher rate of female problems of all sorts. This is readily admitted to in the lesbian community itself.

I do believe that women’s sexuality is far more influenced by psychological factors, generally. Women tend to be more emotionally complex, generally.
I strongly disagree with the premise that all or most homosexual men are ‘feminized’. Many of them are very masculine. It’s just the feminine ones you notice. Because they conform to a false stereotype.

A masculine homosexual can often pass you on the street and you will never notice.
 
Does an effeminate male always equal a homosexual male? Not in my experience.
 
I think I mentioned, there are more effeminate men, and there are also more homosexual men. Therefore, there are fewer heterosexual men and fewer masculine ones.
 
Also, GMO foods can mess with your hormone levels as well, so I wouldn’t doubt that they could cause this kind of development in kids…
It is only GM growth hormone that may have an effect on human hormones. GMO foods in general (other than GM growth hormone, like they inject into cows) have not shown any such effect.
 
Someday…

The homosexuals will infiltrate the government health system and clandestinely find a way to inculcate newborn babies with a hormome that will cause homosexuality for the purpose of cultivating a homosexual majority to dominate the world.
 
This is interesting. I’ve always wondered about overall masculinzation/feminization of the brain. After all, all being a ‘straight’ female could mean is that the area of your brain dealing with sexual attraction was feminized (or, more appropriately, not masculinized). Likewise, being a ‘straight’ male could just mean that the area of the brain was masculinized. If an overall feminizing effect occurred, this could lead to gay men and also more feminine personality traits in general.

On the other hand, lesbians are more complicated too. Under this theory, there would have to be a masculinizing hormone such as DHT to alter one area of the brain without the rest, whereas feminization in men would only require a blockage of masculinizing hormones in select areas, which is easier.

Alternatively, I could be totally wrong. All theory at the moment.
 
BPA Exposure Linked to Higher Rate of Miscarriage
Code:
Exposure to the chemical bisphenol A (BPA) during early pregnancy may  increase the risk of miscarriage, preliminary research suggests.
Researchers collected blood from 114 women when they were four to five  weeks pregnant. The researchers later measured blood levels of BPA in  women who gave birth, and in those who had a first-trimester  miscarriage. Women were divided into four groups based on the amount of  BPA in their blood.
Women in the group with the highest BPA levels were 80 percent more  likely to have a first-trimester miscarriage than those in the group  with the lowest BPA levels, according to the study.
more…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top