L
lssanjose
Guest
finally, a front view of an infant communion
finally, a front view of an infant communion
Because the mystical union with Christ, like a marriage, requires mutual consent, while in Baptism it is the Holy Spirit that acts.If children can receive the Holy Spirit in Baptism before age of reason, why can’t children receive Christ in the Eucharist?
The Church does not teach this at all.Because the mystical union with Christ, like a marriage, requires mutual consent, while in Baptism it is the Holy Spirit that acts.
They receive the Eucharist in liquid form.My biggest concern about infants recieving communion is that they might spit it up. I don’t see any reason why small children couldn’t recieve though, even if they don’t understand completely.
Spitting up IS in liquid form.They receive the Eucharist in liquid form.
That’s certainly a possiblity, but I’ve never seen it happen, and I attend an Eastern Catholic parish where infants and toddlers are communed regularly.My biggest concern about infants recieving communion is that they might spit it up. I don’t see any reason why small children couldn’t recieve though, even if they don’t understand completely.
The liquid form of Eucharist was allowed for infants in the western Church long ago. Infants were not communed after the elimination of the liquid form of Eucharist, because they were not given the solid form of Eucharist. The change in the west occurred about 1000 A.D. (according to Hugh of St. Victor.) Innocent I and St. Augustine both thought that baptism and Eucharist were required for infants to have salvation (of course this is not the official dogma of the Church).Spitting up IS in liquid form.