China and Mark of the Beast

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlexBr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

AlexBr

Guest
I recently did a camp where I was a camp counselor. All of the campers were kids from China. The kids would text the counselors often and we have a giant group chat. Sometimes the Chinese kids would text the number of the mark of the beast. All of the counselors are Christian and were wondering why they would text that number all the time. They told us that the number means super fun and magical. Could this be a sign that the Antichrist might come from Asia?
 
No, it could just be a sign that Chinese children were texting a number to each other. It’s quite a leap to go from “Chinese children at camp texting” to “the antichrist will come from Asia.”

-Fr ACEGC
 
the Chinese kids would text the number of the mark of the beast.
No, the Chinese kids texted 666, which in their culture is like a wish for the ultimate in good luck. Six is a lucky number in China. And triple sixes is like triple lucky-- like hitting “lucky 7”, or lucky 7 7 7 on the slot machine in US culture.
All of the counselors are Christian and were wondering why they would text that number all the time.
Hmm… perhaps counselors at a camp for kids from China should learn a little about Chinese culture. Just a thought.
They told us that the number means super fun and magical.
Yep, that’s about right-- 6 is lucky number in Chinese culture, as are 8 and 9. While 4 and 7 are unlucky.
Could this be a sign that the Antichrist might come from Asia?
What a weird question.
 
666 was also used as a code in early Christianity for Emperor Nero, if I am not mistaken…
 
They are probably having a laugh at your expense.

I used to do this as a teenager, make adults react to saying something we know we shouldn’t.
 
Just keep in mind that China is at the mercy of an atheist regime.
 
As a general guideline, I would not invoke the supernatural unless if there was some specific indication that doing so would be appropriate.

For example, if one of the children was making their head turn 360 degrees, then maybe further inquiry would be needed. Probably more of a medical or psychological variety (of either you or the child), but I guess it would be reasonable to suspect the supernatural.

In any case, an ordinary person’s only tool against the devil is being a good Christian, which is what you should be doing whether the child is demonic or not, so the unless there’s some sort of specific need for an exorcism or the like, it’s not really relevant as far as I see it.
 
I read that in the oldest manuscript the number of the Beast was actually 616, so based on that I’m positive the Antichrist will be coming from Grand Rapids, Michigan, which has that area code.

By the way, those Chinese kids probably figured out that “Christians” in USA are scared of the number 666 which to them is simply a lucky number, and they are having a good laugh at your expense.
 
It is quite possible the antichrist could be from the U.S. That is quite a possibility since it is the establishment of not just the freedom of religion, but the freedom of heresy.

The Mark of the Beast, as the writer says, “one who has wisdom.” That should be telling since Solomon was attributed with wisdom, as a gift from God. But then he abused that gift with numerous woman he had as wives, and wealth, and so forth.

The sign of the beast is the lacking in Covenant relation to God.

The day which marks creation of creatures, but man. A beast. And that also means the mark of the Covenant fading, as well.

I forgot the word/term people use to think angels had children with humans (which is not what happened.) But that was the time men of renown were known. But the Covenental endurance of Seth began to fade. That’s another key indicator. Then again, there’s Noah and the flood. Whereby people were in marriage, and given into marriage. The attention to the Covenant was fading. It wasn’t God just standing there. However, it was Salvation History about to end, because Salvation was no longer being exhibited, lived. Except for Noah and his family.

The mark of the beast has purveyed man and history. It is the fall of man out from Salvation. However, if the world contends that man must give up the Sacraments, give up the teachings of the Church, and no longer live in Covenant, in order to buy or sell. In order to live in the world. And if man will not suffer martyrdom in the Sacraments. Then that would be the mark of the beast.

When man’s heart leaves God. And he turns to his own pride, arrogance, and desires, passions, and sins. Then he lives by the mark, like the devil.

The mark of the beast follows plight of hell, satan, the devil, the harlot, and the beast. It is the mark of evil. Man fallen out of Covenant. Like the angels who fell.

Our Lady in Fatima and the Angel, knew this. That was also the nihilistic age brought about by man. For Our Lady took good insight to the children in Fatima, by showing hell where poor sinners go when they have no one to pray for them. In addition, the Angel bowed before the Sacrament, and said for those “who do not believe, who do not adore, and do not hope, and do not love.” And then Angel’s last decree, “Penance! Penance! Penance!”

Our Lady’s turning point for souls to escape the mark of the beast.

And who knows, since man cannot really live without God. The mark may be deceptive as being Christian. People who allow for divorce, allow for transgender, gay or other sexual orientations that do not fall into the Covenantal surrender to the state of Matrimony (one man and one woman.) Perhaps to summarize partly the mark of the beast would be clearly rendered in “Humane Vitae.”

And the U.S. which is partly tied to heresies and societies who have been adversaries of the Church. Really house that inheritance, as antichrist.
 
Last edited:
The Bible contains the words of life. It’s not a game of Clue where you look around for signs of the end times.
 
I am going to surmise your first language isn’t English. Furthermore, you’re really really stretching to fit different pieces of things together.
 
From points of Scripture study (i.e. Dr. Scott Hahn, Jeff Cavins.) Who have spent a great deal of their life deep in Scripture. I’d then have to say, none of what I posed and said are “stretching” anything.

The Mark which described in Revelation has to do with sin completely embodied and held in people’s lives, without Salvation. Thus, the loss of Covenantal embrace of God and His Church.

Revelation is the Summation of Salvation History. The Past, Present, and Future.

When you read through Revelation that people could not sell or buy, or do anything without this Mark. That means rejecting Christ. And more so, within the Church, rejecting completely the Sacramental life.

We’re lucky it’s come sin inlets, and deceptions, rather than an all out rug pulled from under our feet.

Consider, inlets of influence/people telling us that the Sacrament of Matrimony can be given and offered to people who are the same sex. Yet, since the Sacrament belongs to God. And the act of Matrimony blest by the priest, blessed that Union between a man and a woman. For that means children (regardless of the inability some people have.) Another fall from the Sacramental life would be female priest’s. Because, they cannot bring about the True Presence of Christ. They cannot act in His Person. Why? Simple, Jesus the Son of God, a man. Not a woman. It isn’t a prejudice, either. Nor is it discriminating in some unjust manner. For man was supposed to guard the first woman, Eve. But he didn’t and caved into sinning with her. And so Jesus died, rather than give into sin. For He is as Saint Paul described, the new Adam. And this what the priest’s inheritance is.

For if we are not able to buy or sell anything because rules of society and the world say we cannot because of the rules and life we bear in the in Sacraments, would be the construct and mark of the beast.

And, a “Church” that merits for people receiving bread (thinking it is Christ) through woman priest’s, or even men who are not ordained, rightly. Then that mean’s people think they are in the grace of the Sacraments, when they are not. Just to suit the world, and sin.

It is in a world that people must live believing sin doesn’t exist. And that they are well, happy, and good. And that Jesus and God are just happy the way people are, just getting along and being happy together. Some sort of Heaven on Earth. Which begets as a moral heresy. When that time comes, Christ will come to recon with the evil one that is a man who beholds to being the son of perdition. Who thus lives completely in that belief freely of his own will. The man will battle with Christ and His Church. The man will try to undo the Sacraments from their place, and deceive people. To honor and give glory to the world. In other words, to restore paganism once again. That world means things like abortion (child sacrifice), sexual orientations and multitudes of relationships (orgies), transgender (mutilation.) And so on and so forth.

To repeat, this sort of wickedness is quite apparent in Saint Paul the VI “Humane Vitae.”

What do you “surmise” from that?
 
Last edited:
multitudes of relationships (orgies),
Having alot of relationships is not the same as having an orgy.
We’re lucky it’s come sin inlets,
What does that mean?
The man will battle with Christ and His Church.
“The Man?” Who is that? Never heard of him.
For if we are not able to buy or sell anything because rules of society and the world say we cannot because of the rules and life we bear in the in Sacraments, would be the construct and mark of the beast.
Just…what???
I surmise you are trying to sound theological. But it is not err making sense.
 
When I lived in San Francisco, my parish church was SS. Peter and Paul’s at 666 Filbert Street, and to this day it remains the most faithful and traditional parish to which I have ever belonged. I am not Asian, but I can tell you triple sixes does not always have an evil connotation.
 
Thank you for clarifying. I do know what you mean by an “inlet.”
Are you able to explain the other parts I questioned?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top